The Authors investigated the addition of novel quality indicators, patient risk adjustment, and simple statistics in an ongoing clinician feedback initiative that profiles diabetes care for 13 Veterans Affairs (VA) clinics. Data were extracted from a computerized database for calendar years 2004 to 2005. Performance was assessed with 4 monitoring measures, 3 intermediate outcomes, and 3 appropriate treatment measures. Attainment rates for each indicator were calculated by clinic. The effect of risk adjustment and the significance of clinic performance variation were determined with multivariate logistic models. Analysis of the 10 quality measures revealed lower attainment and greater clinic-level variation for the less familiar indicators. Statistically significant performance variations were detected among clinics, with several being of a clinically important magnitude. Risk adjustment did not substantially change performance. The addition of clinically relevant quality measures and simple statistics appeared to enhance the characterization of performance by this profiling program. (Am J Med Qual 2009;24:123-131)
Rosenthal MB , Frank RG, Li Z., Epstein AMEarly experience with pay-for-performance: from concept to practice. JAMA. 2005;294:1788-1793.
2.
Rowe JWPay-for-performance and accountability: related themes in improving health care. Ann Intern Med. 2006;145: 695-699.
3.
National Committee for Quality Assurance.National Committee for Quality Assurance Web site. Available at: http://web.ncqa.org/. Accessed November 11, 2007.
4.
Centers for Medicare and Medcaid Services.Medicare pay for performance (P4P) initiatives. Available at: http://www.cms.hhs.gov/apps/media/press/release.asp?Counter=1343 . Accessed November 12, 2007.
5.
Department of Veterans Affairs Health Care Personnel Enhancement Act of 2004, S 2484, 108th Cong, 2nd Sess (2004).
6.
Hofer TP, Hayward RA, Greenfield S., Wagner EH, Kaplan SH, Manning WGThe unreliability of individual physician "report cards" for assessing the costs and quality of care of a chronic disease. JAMA. 1999;281:2098-2105.
7.
Hofer TP, Asch SM, Hayward RA, et al. Profiling quality of care: is there a role for peer review? BMC Health Serv Res. 2004;4:9.
8.
Hayward RA, Hofer TP, Kerr EA, Krein SLQuality improvement initiatives: issues in moving from diabetes guidelines to policy. Diabetes Care. 2004;27:B54-B60.
9.
Rodondi N., Peng T., Karter AJ, et al. Therapy modifications in response to poorly controlled hypertension, dyslipidemia, and diabetes mellitus. Ann Intern Med. 2006;144:475-484.
10.
Dudley RA, Rosenthal MBPay for Performance: A Decision Guide for Purchasers. Washington, DC: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2006.
11.
Zhang Q., Safford M., Ottenweller J., et al. Performance status of health care facilities changes with risk adjustment of HbA1c. Diabetes Care. 2000;23:919-927.
12.
Kerr EA, Gerzoff RB, Krein SL, et al. Diabetes care quality in the Veterans Affairs Health Care System and commercial managed care: the TRIAD study. Ann Intern Med . 2004;141: 272-281.
13.
Roland M.Linking physician's pay to the quality of care: a major experiment in the United Kingdom. N Engl J Med. 2004;351:1448-1454.
14.
Krein SL, Hofer TP, Kerr EA, Hayward RAWhom should we profile? Examining diabetes care practice variation among primary care providers, provider groups, and health care facilities . Health Serv Res. 2002;37:1159-1180.
15.
Kerr EA, Smith DM, Hogan MM, et al. Building a better quality measure: are some patients with `poor quality' actually getting good care? Med Care. 2003;41:1173-1182.
16.
Kizer KW, Demakis JG, Feussner JRReinventing VA health care: systematizing quality improvement and quality innovation. Med Care. 2000;38:17-116.
17.
Miller DR, Safford MM, Pogach LMWho has diabetes? Best estimates of diabetes prevalence in the Department of Veterans Affairs based on computerized patient data. Diabetes Care. 2004;27:B10-B21.
18.
Sawin CT, Walder DJ, Bross DS, Pogach LMDiabetes process and outcome measures in the Department of Veterans Affairs . Diabetes Care. 2004;27:B90-B94.
19.
National Quality Forum.National Voluntary Consensus Standards for Adult Diabetes Care: 2005. Washington, DC: National Quality Forum ; 2005.
20.
Chin MH, Zhang JX, Merrell K.Diabetes in the African-American Medicare population. Morbidity, quality of care, and resource utilization. Diabetes Care.1998;21: 1090-1095.
21.
Safford M., Eaton L., Hawley G., et al. Disparities in use of lipid-lowering medications among people with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Arch Intern Med. 2003;163:922-928.
22.
Piette JD, Kerr EAThe impact of comorbid chronic conditions on diabetes care. Diabetes Care. 2006;29:725-731.
23.
Heisler M., Smith DM, Hayward RA, Krein SL, Kerr EARacial disparities in diabetes care processes, outcomes, and treatment intensity . Med Care. 2003;41:1221-1232.
24.
Kiefe CI, Funkhouser E., Fouad MN, May DSChronic disease as a barrier to breast and cervical cancer screening . J Gen Intern Med. 1998;13:357-365.
25.
Deyo RA, Cherkin DC, Ciol MAAdapting a clinical comorbidity index for use with ICD-9-CM administrative databases. J Clin Epidemiol. 1992;45:613-619.
26.
Helmer DA, Tseng CL, Brimacombe M., Rajan M., Stiptzarov N., Pogach L.Applying diabetes-related prevention quality indicators to a national cohort of veterans with diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2003;26:3017-3023.
27.
Kerr EA, Smith DM, Hogan MM, et al. Comparing clinical automated, medical record, and hybrid data sources for diabetes quality measures. Jt Comm J Qual Improv . 2002;28: 555-565.
