The purpose of this study was to evaluate the potential for online continuing medical education (CME) seminars to improve quality of care. Primary care physicians (113) participated in a randomized controlled trial to evaluate an online CME series. Physicians were randomized to view either a seminar about type 2 diabetes or a seminar about systolic heart failure. Following the seminar, physicians were presented with 4 clinical vignettes and asked to describe what tests, treatments, counseling, or referrals they would recommend. Physicians who viewed the seminars were significantly more likely to recommend guideline-consistent care to patients in the vignettes. For example, physicians who viewed the diabetes seminar were significantly more likely to order an eye exam for diabetes patients (63%) compared with physicians in the control group (27%). For some guidelines there were no group differences. These results provide early evidence of the effectiveness of online CME programs to improve physician clinical practice. (Am J Med Qual 2008;23:475-483)
Davis D.Does CME work? An analysis of the effect of educational activities on physician performance or health care outcomes. Int J Psychiatry Med . 1998;28:21-39.
2.
Davis DA, Thompson MA, Oxman AD, Haynes RBEvidence for the effectiveness of CME. A review of 50 randomized controlled trials. JAMA. 1992;268:1111-1117.
3.
Davis DA, Thompson MA, Oxman AD, Haynes RBChanging physician performance. A systematic review of the effect of continuing medical education strategies. JAMA. 1995;274:700-705.
4.
Tu K., Davis D.Can we alter physician behavior by educational methods? Lessons learned from studies of the management and follow-up of hypertension. J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2002;22:11-22.
5.
Ockene JK, Lindsay EA, Hymowitz N., et al. Tobacco control activities of primary-care physicians in the Community Intervention Trial for Smoking Cessation. COMMIT Research Group. Tob Control. 1997;6(suppl 2):S49-S56.
6.
Curran VRAn eclectic model for evaluating web-based continuing medical education courseware systems. Eval Health Prof. 2000;23:319-348.
7.
Dickmann C., Habermeyer E., Spitzer K.WWW-based continuing medical education: how do general practitioners use it ? Stud Health Technol Inform. 2000;77:588-592.
8.
Harris JM, Salasche SJ, Harris RBCan Internet-based continuing medical education improve physicians' skin cancer knowledge and skills? J Gen Intern Med. 2001 ;16:50-56.
9.
Kemper KJ, Amata-Kynvi A., Sanghavi D.Randomized trial of an internet curriculum on herbs and other dietary supplements for health care professionals. Acad Med. 2002 ;77:882-889.
10.
Cauffman JG , Forsyth RA, Clark VA, et al. Randomized controlled trials of continuing medical education: what makes them most effective? J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2002;22:214-221.
11.
Bonevski B. , Sanson-Fisher RW, Campbell E., Carruthers A., Reid AL, Ireland M.Randomized controlled trial of a computer strategy to increase general practitioner preventive care. Prev Med. 1999;29(6, pt 1):478-486.
12.
Peabody JW, Luck J., Glassman P., Dresselhaus TR, Lee M.Comparison of vignettes, standardized patients, and chart abstraction: a prospective validation study of 3 methods for measuring quality. JAMA . 2000;283:1715-1722.
13.
Peabody JW, Tozija F., Muňoz JA, Nordyke RJ, Luck J.Using vignettes to compare the quality of clinical care variation in economically divergent countries. Health Serv Res. 2004 ;39(6, pt 2):1951-1970.
14.
Dresselhaus TR, Peabody JW, Luck J., Bertenthal D.An evaluation of vignettes for predicting variation in the quality of preventive care. J Gen Intern Med. 2004;19: 1013-1018.
15.
Peabody JW, Luck J., Glassman P., et al. Measuring the quality of physician practice by using clinical vignettes: a prospective validation study. Ann Intern Med . 2004;141:771-780.
16.
Cook DA, Gelula MH, Dupras DM, Schwartz A.Instructional methods and cognitive and learning styles in web-based learning: report of two randomised trials. Med Educ. 2007; 41:897-905.
17.
Cook DA, Beckman TJ, Bordage G.Quality of reporting of experimental studies in medical education: a systematic review. Med Educ. 2007;41:737-745.
18.
Francois P. , Vinck D., Labarère J., Reverdy T., Peyrin JCAssessment of an intervention to train teaching hospital care providers in quality management. Qual Saf Health Care. 2005;14:234-239.
