The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Quality Indicator tools were used to identify risk factors for maternal birth-related trauma rates in the 2003 Nationwide Inpatient Sample and the 2002-2004 Iowa State Inpatient Database. Risk-adjusted analyses of these datasets isolated salient risk factors for maternal trauma. The rates of Iowa's risk factors for the most serious types of trauma—third/fourth-degree lacerations—were compared with national rates. The comparisons suggest that episiotomy, artificial rupture of membranes, obstructed labor, and late pregnancies are the most salient risk factors for third/fourth-degree lacerations within Iowa. Thus, this research suggested that a combination of maternal, baby, and episiotomy factors contributed to the high prevalence of third/fourth-degree lacerations in vaginal deliveries in Iowa. Finally, our risk-adjustment methodology could be used in a similar manner to analyze other discharge datasets for opportunities to improve maternal outcomes. (Am J Med Qual 2007;22:334-343)
Renfrew MJ, Hannah W., Albers L., Floyd E.Practices that minimize trauma to the genital tract in childbirth: a systematic review of the literature. Birth. 1998;25:143-160.
2.
Beckman MM, Garrett AJAntenatal perineal massage for reducing perineal trauma. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews.2005, Issue 1. Article No.: CD005123. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD005123.pub 2. Available at: www.mrw.interscience.wiley.com/cochrane/clsysrev/articles/CD005123/frame.html. Accessed October 12, 2005.
Carroli G., Belizan J.Episiotomy for vaginal birth. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews.1999, Issue 3. Article Number: CD000081. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD000081. Available at: www.mrw.interscience.wiley.com/cochrane/clsysrev/articles/CD000081/frame.html. Accessed October 12, 2005.
5.
Hartmann K., Viswanathan M., Palmieri R., Gartlehner G., Thorp J. Jr, Lohr KNOutcomes of routine episiotomy: a systematic review. JAMA.2005;293:2141-2148.
6.
Johanson RB, Menon V.Vacuum extraction versus forceps for assisted vaginal delivery. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews.1999, Issue 2. Article Number: CD000224. DOI: 10.1002/14651585.CD000224. Available at: www.mrw.interscience.wiley.com/cochrane/clsysrev/articles/CD000224/frame.html. Accessed October 12, 2005.
7.
Elixhauser A. , Steiner C., Harris RD, Coffey RMComorbidity measures for use with administrative data. Med Care.1998; 36:8-27.
8.
Cunningham GF, Hauth JC, Leveno KJ, Gilstrap L III , Bloom S L, Wenstrom KD, eds. Williams Obstetrics. 22nd ed. New York, NY: McGraw Hill ; 2005.
9.
AHRQ Quality Indicators (January 17, 2005). Guide to Patient Safety Indicators, Version 2.1, Revision 3. AHRQ Pub.03-R203. Rockville, Md: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2003.
10.
AHRQ Quality Indicators (February 15, 2005 ). Patient Safety Indicators: Software Documentation, Version 2.1— SAS, Revision 3a. AHRQ Pub.03-R204. Rockville, Md: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality ; 2003.
