Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

The objective was to determine if a personal digital assistant (PDA) diabetes management system improves processes and outcomes of diabetes care in a primary care setting. Outcomes and processes of care were compared between and within 2 groups of patients with type II diabetes. The intervention group of 58 patients was managed for 16 months with the aid of a PDA diabetes management system. The control group of 115 patients from the same clinic was managed by 1 of 5 physicians not using the diabetes management system. PDA use improved 2 processes of care: annual number of foot and eye examinations (P < .0001 for both). PDA use did not have significant effect on outcomes of care. This PDA disease management system can improve providers’ ability to meet practice guidelines for processes of care. However, like other recent studies, there was no improvement in outcomes of diabetes care.

Keywords

computers handheld/utilization clinical practice guidelines diabetes mellitus practice guidelines

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Ford E , Williamson DF , Liu S. Weight change and diabetes incidence: findings from a national cohort of US adults. Am J Epidemiol. 1997;146: 214-222.

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention . Diabetes Surveillance, 1997. Atlanta, Ga: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services; 1997.

Economic consequences of diabetes mellitus in the U.S. in 1997, American Diabetes Association. Diabetes Care. 1998; 21: 296-309.

Saaddine JB , Engelgau MM , Beckles GL , et al. A diabetes report card for the United States: Quality of care in the 1990s. Ann Intern Med. 2002;136: 565-574.

McGlynn E , Asch SM , Adams J , et al. The quality of health care delivered to adults in the United States. N Engl J Med. 2003;348: 2635-2645.

Eytan TA , Goldberg HI.

How effective is the computer-based clinical practice guideline?

Eff Clin Pract. 2001;4: 24-33.

Cook DJ , Greengold NL , Ellrodt AG , Weingarten SR. The relation between systematic reviews and practice guidelines. Ann Intern Med. 1997;127: 210-216.

Lohr KN. Guidelines for clinical practice: applications for primary care. Int J Qual Health Care. 1994;6: 17-25.

Fischer S , Stewart TE , Mehta S , Wax R , Lapinsky SE. Handheld Computing in Medicine. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2003;10: 139-149.

10.

Spero M , Kenet A , Porter B. Computer-prompted diabetes care. Effective Clinical Practice. October/November 1998:1: 90-92.

11.

Curry WJ , Shaeffer G , Brian J. Impact of a PDA-based diabetic electronic management system in a primary care office. Paper presented at: North American Research Group, October 2004, Orlando, Fla.

12.

Kirkman M , Williams SR , Caffrey HH , Marrero DG. Impact of a program to improve adherence to diabetes guidelines by primary care physicians. Diabetes Care. 2002;25: 1946-1951.

13.

Hirsch IB. The burden of diabetes (care). Diabetes Care. 2003;26: 1613-1614.

14.

American Diabetes Association . Standards of medical care for patients with diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Care. 2002;25: 213-229.

15.

O’Connor PJ , Crain AL , Rush WA , Sperl-Hillen JM , Gutenkauf JJ , Duncan JE. Impact of an electronic medical record on diabetes quality of care. Ann Fam Med. 2005;3: 300-306.

Impact of a PDA-Based Diabetes Electronic Management System in a Primary Care Office

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References