Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Federal law requires hospitals and permits other entities to seek information from the National Practitioner Data Bank (NPDB) but places no requirements on how that information should be used. Our survey of NPDB users demonstrates that although the NPDB has generated substantial controversy and its information is nominally available from other sources, it still plays an important role in the credentialing process. Most institutions make timely NPDB inquiries that facilitate widespread use of the information in credentialing activities (4-5 individuals or committees). However, in 3% to 7% of cases, a decision was reached before the institution had the NPDB report. Between 5% and 30% of privileging and licensure applications involving an NPDB report were not granted “as requested,” suggesting the NPDB data are important to the process. Unfortunately, underreporting was also evident: 60% to 75% of reportable actions were not reported, limiting the information to which health care entities have access.

Keywords

National Practitioner Data Bank NPDB hospital reporting quality improvement credentialing

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

The Health Care Quality Improvement Act of 1986, Pub L No. 99-660, 100 Stat 3784, amended at 42 USC §§11101-11152.

Smarr LE . A comparative assessment of the PIAA data sharing project and the National Practitioner Data Bank: policy, purpose, and application. Law and Contemporary Problems. 1997; 60(1):59-79.

US General Accounting Office . National Practitioner Data Bank: Major Improvements AreNeeded to EnhanceDataBank's Reliability(GAO-01-130). Washington, DC: General Accounting Office; 2000.

Waters TM , Warneke R , Parsons J , AlmagorO , BudettiPP . Usefulness of information provided by the National Practitioner Data Bank. Jt Comm J Qual Saf. 2003;29:416-424.

Quirey WO , Adamas J . National Practitioner Data Bank revisited: the lessons of Michael Swango, MD. Health Law News. 1999;15(1). Available at: http://www.vsb.org/sections/hl/Decnewsletter.htm. Accessed July 19, 2005.

Brennan TA . Hospital peer review and clinical privileges actions: to report or not report. JAMA. 1999;282:381-382.

Committee on Quality of Health Care in America, Institute of Medicine. Kohn LT , Corrigan JM , Donaldson MS , eds. To Err Is Human: Building a Safer Health System. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2000.

Institute of Medicine, Committee on Quality of Health Care in America . Crossing theQualityChasm: ANewHealth System for the 21st Century. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 2001.

Brennan T , BerwickD . NewRules: Regulation, Markets, and the Quality of American Health Care. San Francisco, Calif: Jossey-Bass; 1995.

10.

Waters TM , Budetti PP , Almagor O , Warnecke R , Parsons J . National Practitioner Data Bank User and Non-user Surveys: Final Report. Submitted under DHHS/HRSA contract 230-98-0030; June 2001.

11.

Health Resources and Services Administration . National Practitioner Data Bank Annual Report 2003. Bethesda, Md: Health Resources and Services Administration; 2004.

12.

National Committee for Quality Assurance. Available at: http://www.ncqa.org/about/about.htm. Accessed July 15, 2005.

13.

Baldwin L-M , Hart LG , Oshel RE , Fordyce MA , Cohen R , Rosenblatt R . Hospital peer review and the National Practitioner Data Bank: clinical privileges action reports. JAMA. 1999;282:349-355.

14.

ScheutzowSO . Statemedical peer review: high cost but no benefit—is it time for a change? Am J Law Med. 1999;25(1):7-60.

15.

US Department of Health and Human Services, Office of the Inspector General . Hospital Reporting to the National Practitioner Data Bank(DHHS OIGReportOEI-01-94-00050). Washington, DC: Department of Health and Human Services; February 1995.

16.

USDepartment of Health andHuman Services, Office of the Inspector General . Legislative Recommendation to Improve Hospital Reporting to the National Practitioner Data Bank. Washington,-DC: Department of Health and Human Services; July 21, 1999.

17.

US Department of Health and Human Services, Office of Inspector General . Managed Care Organization Nonreporting to the National Practitioner Data Bank(DHHS OIG Report OEI-01-99-00690). Washington, DC: Department of Health and Human Services; May 2001.

The Role of the National Practitioner Data Bank in the Credentialing Process

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References