The Effect of Physician Characteristics and Their Practice Environment on Surgical Referral Patterns for Early-Stage Breast Cancer in Iowa

Abstract

The objective of this article was to examine whether characteristics of referring physicians and their practice environment were associated with surgical referral behavior for early-stage breast cancer patients. A total of 2801 women diagnosed with early-stage breast cancer and their referring physicians were identified from the Iowa Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database during 1989-1996. The Iowa Physician Inventory was used to collect information on characteristics of referring physicians. Multiple logistic regression analyses were conducted to evaluate characteristics of the referring physicians and their practice environment to explain surgical referral behavior. Affiliation with physicians' networks and professional diversity among area specialists were associated with increased referrals to surgeons more likely to perform breast-conserving surgery. Promoting interaction among physicians, particularly among those with different specialties, may increase the diffusion of new behaviors into clinical practice.

Keywords

Breast cancer physician behavior physician practice patterns Surveillance,Epidemiology and End Results Pro-gram

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

National Consensus Conference . Treatment of early breast cancer. JAMA. 1991;265:391-395.

Lazovich D , Solomon CC , Thomas DB , et al. Breast conservation therapy in the United States following the 1990 National Institutes of Health Consensus Development. Cancer. 1999;86:628-637.

Nattinger AB , Gottleib MS , Veum J, et al. Geographic variation in the use of breast-conserving treatment for breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 1992;326:1102-1107.

Osteen T , Steeke G , Menck HR , et al. Regional differences in the surgical management of breast cancer. Cancer. 1992;42:39-43.

Wolberg WH . Surgical options in 424 patients with primary breast cancer without systematic metastasis. Arch Surg. 1991; 126:817-820.

Tarbox BB , Rockwood JK , Abernathy CM . Are modified radical mastectomies done for Ti breast cancers because of surgeon's advice or patient's choice? Am J Surg. 1992;164:417-422.

Ward S , Heidrick S , Wolberg W . Factors women take into account when deciding upon type of surgery for breast cancer. Cancer Nurs. 1989;112:344-351.

Stafford D , Szczys R , Becker R , et al. How breast cancer treatment decisions are made by women in North Dakota. Am J Surg. 1998;176:515-519.

Ayanian JZ , Guadagnoli E . Variations in breast cancer treatment by patient and provider characteristics. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 1996;40:65-74.

10.

Shambaugh EM , Ries LAG . SEER Program: Comparative Staging Guide for Cancer, National Cancer Institute. Bethesda, Md: National Institutes of Health;1993. NIH Publication 93-3640.

11.

Lomas J , Enkin M , Anderson GM , et al. Opinion leader versus audit and feedback to implement practice guidelines. JAMA. 1991;265:2202-2207.

12.

Geertsma RH , Parker RC , Whitbourne SK . How physicians view the process of change in their practice behavior. J Med Educ. 1982;57:752-761.

13.

Rogers EM . Diffusion of Innovations. New York: The Free Press;1995.

14.

Cherkin DC , Rosenblatt RA , Hart LG , et al.

The use of medical resources by residency-trained family physicians and general internists: is there a difference?

Med Care. 1987;25:455-469.

15.

Fishbane M , Starfield B . Child health care in the United States: a comparison of pediatricians and general practitioners. N Engl J Med. 1981;305:552-556.

16.

McFall SL , Warnecke RB , Kaluzny AD , et al. Physician and practice characteristics associated with judgments about breast cancer treatment. Med Care. 1994;32:106-117.

17.

Soumerai SB , Avorn J . Principles of educational outreach ('academic detailing') to improve clinical decision making. JAMA. 1990;263:549-556.

18.

Cabana MD , Rand CS , Powe NR , et al. Why don't physicians follow clinical practice guidelines? A framework for improvement. JAMA. 1999;282:1458-1465.

19.

Hayward RS . Clinical practice guidelines on trial. Can Med Assoc J 1997;156:1725-1727.

20.

Young JG , Young JM , Kristoffersen DT , et al. Audit and feedback: effects on professional practice and health care outcomes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2003;3:CD000259.

21.

Schectman JM , Schroth WS , Verme D , et al. Randomized controlled trial of education and feedback for implementation of guidelines for acute low back pain. J Gen Intern Med. 2003;18: 773-780.

22.

Foy R , MacLennan G , Grimshaw J , et al. Attributes of clinical recommendations that influence change in practice following audit and feedback. J Clin Epidemiol. 2002;55:717-722.

23.

Institute of Medicine . Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Century. Washington, DC: National Academy Press;2001.

24.

Hadley J , Mandelblatt JS , Mitchell JM , et al. Medicare breast surgery fees and treatment received by older women with localized breast cancer. Health Serv Res. 2003;38:553-573.