The purpose of this study was to (a) investigate the extent to which academic faculty practice plans (FPPs) are currently involved in ambulatory care quality improvement (QI), (b) describe the structure of QI initiatives at outpatient FPPs, and (c) delineate facilitators and barriers to development of FPP outpatient QI initiatives. Members of the Steering Committee of the Group Practice Council of the University HealthSystem Consortium (UHC), representing the leadership of 88 FPPs, were asked to respond to a 38-item Web-based questionnaire during February and March 2003. The survey elicited information on the organizational characteristics of FPPs, their current degree of engagement in outpatient QI activities, and factors driving interest and barriers impeding efforts to conduct outpatient QI initiatives. Descriptive statistics for all variables of interest were performed. Responses were received from 33 participants believed to represent at least 28 of the total 88 FPP members of the UHC. Nearly all respondents indicated that some types of outpatient QI initiatives were currently taking place in their FPP. However, only 12% of respondents met 4 or more of the 6 criteria deemed to be essential to having a robust outpatient QI program. Among key QI indicators, one third of respondents reported that their FPP had a separate and distinct outpatient quality committee, and some one fifth had a budget for outpatient QI or financial incentives for outpatient clinics to engage in QI (or both). The majority of respondents stated that at least some departments in their FPP were collecting quality data. Most respondents reported that patient safety and external demand for outpatient QI were the "more important" factors driving QI efforts, whereas lack of human resources and other resources were the "more significant" barriers hindering QI initiatives. The results of the study suggest that, although FPPs showed a strong interest in outpatient QI initiatives, FPPs' efforts are still in an infancy phase and lag far behind inpatient performance measurement activities. Without appropriate resources, it appears unlikely that FPPs will be able to move the agenda forward to develop a quality culture and robust program of self-assessment and improvement in the outpatient setting.
Leape LL, Woods DD, Hatlie MJ, et al.Promoting patient safety by preventing medical error. JAMA. 1998;280:1444-1447.
2.
McGlynn EA, Asch SM, Adams J, et al.The quality of health care delivered to adults in the United States. N Engl J Med. 2003;348:2635-2645.
3.
Institute of Medicine. Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Century. Washington, DC: National Academy Press;2001.
4.
Institute of Medicine. To Err is Human: Building a Safer Health System. Washington, DC: National Academy Press;1999.
5.
Laffel G, Blumenthal D. The case for using industrial quality management science in health care organizations. JAMA. 1989; 262:2869-2873.
6.
Shortell SM, Bennett CL, Byck GR. Assessing the impact of continuous quality improvement on clinical practice: what it will take to accelerate progress. Milbank Q. 1998;76:593-624.
7.
Schenkel S. Promoting patient safety and preventing medical error in emergency departments. Acad Emerg Med. 2000;7:1204-1222.
8.
Hammons T, Piland NF, Small SD, et al.Ambulatory patient safety. What we know and need to know. J Ambul Care Manage. 2003;26:63-82.
9.
Roski J, Gregory R. Performance measurement for ambulatory care: moving towards a new agenda. Int J Qual Health Care. 2001;13:447-453.
10.
Weingart SN, Wilson RM, Gibberd RW, et al.Epidemiology of medical error. BMJ2000;320:774-777.
11.
Aparasu RR, Fliginger SE. Inappropriate medication prescribing for the elderly by office-based physicians. Ann Pharmacother. 1997;31:823-829.
12.
Hopkins JR. Financial incentives for ambulatory care performance improvement. Jt Comm J Qual Improu. 1999;25:223-238.
13.
Zazove P, Klinkman MS. Developing a CQI program in a family medicine department. Jt Comm J Qual Improv. 1998;24:391-406.
14.
Loeppke R, Howell JW. Integrating clinical performance improvement across physician organizations: the PhyCor experience. Jt Comm J Qual Improv. 1999;25:55-67.
15.
Longnecker DE, Henson DE, Wilezek K, et al.Future directions for academic practice plans: thoughts on organization and management from Johns Hopkins University and the University of Pennsylvania. Acad Med. 2003;11:1130-1143.
16.
Fischer LR, Solberg LI, Kottke TE. Quality improvement in primary care clinics. Jt Comm J Qual Improv. 1998;24:361-370.
17.
Nash D. Making the case for quality: an interview with David Nash. Interview by Gary Rosenthal. Jt Comm J Qual Improv. 1999;25:259-264.
18.
The Academic Medical Center Working Group of the Institute for Healthcare Improvement. The imperative for quality: a call for action to medical schools and teaching hospitals. Acad Med. 2003;11:1085-1089.
19.
Statistical Analysis Systems. Version 8.2. Cary, NC: Statistical Analysis Systems Institute;2001.
20.
Shulkin D. Using a market model to track advances in patient safety. Jt Comm J Qual Saf2003;29:146-151.
21.
Schleyer TK, Forrest JL. Methods for the design and administration of web-based surveys. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2000;7: 416-425.
