The objective was to evaluate whether physician feed-back accompanied by an action checklist improved diabetes care process measures. Eighty-three physicians in an academic general medicine clinic were provided a single feedback report on the most recent date and result of diabetes care measures (glycosylated hemoglobin [Alc, urine microalbumin, serum creatinine, lipid levels, retinal examination) as well as recent diabetes medication refills with calculated dosing and adherence on 789 patients. An educational session regarding the feedback and adherence information was provided. The physicians were asked to complete a checklist accompanying the feedback on each of their patients, indicating requested actions with respect to follow-up, testing, and counseling. The physicians completed 82% of patient checklists, requesting actions consistent with patient needs on the basis of the feedback. Of the physicians, 93% felt the patient information and intervention format to be useful. The odds of urine microalbumin testing, serum creatinine, lipid profile, Alc, and retinal examination increased in the 6 months after the feedback. The increase was sustained at 1 year only for microalbumin and retinal exams. There was no significant change in refill adherence for the group overall after the feedback, although adherence did improve among patients of physicians attending the educational session. No significant change was noted in lipid or Alc levels during the study period. In conclusion, a simple physician feedback tool with action checklist can be both helpful and popular for improving rates of diabetes care guideline adherence. More complex interventions are likely required to improve diabetes outcomes.
Harris MI. Noninsulin-dependent diabetes mellitus in black and white Americans. Diabetes Metab Rev. 1990;6:71-90.
2.
Harris MI, Flegal KM, Cowie CC, et al.Prevalence of diabetes, impaired fasting glucose, and impaired glucose tolerance in US adults. The Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1988-1994. Diabetes Care. 1998;21:518-524.
3.
Nichols GA, Hillier TA, Javor K, et al.Predictors of glycemic control in insulin-using adults with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2000;23:273-277.
4.
Harris MI, Eastman RC, Cowie CC, et al.Racial and ethnic differences in glycemic control of adults with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 1999;22:403-408.
5.
Delamater AM, Shaw KR, Applegate EB, et al.Risk for metabolic control problems in minority youth with diabetes. Diabetes Care. 1999;22:700-705.
6.
Harris MI. Racial and ethnic differences in health care access and health outcomes for adults with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2001;24:454-459.
7.
Harris EL, Sherman S, Georgopoulos A. Black-white differences in risk of developing retinopathy among individuals with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 1999;22:779-783.
8.
Glasgow RE, Hiss RG, Anderson R, et al.Report of the health care delivery work group: behavioral research related to the establishment of a chronic disease model for diabetes care. Diabetes Care. 2001;24:124-130.
9.
Fleming BB, Greenfield S, Engelgau MM, et al.The diabetes quality improvement project: moving science into health policy to gain an edge on the diabetes epidemic. Diabetes Care. 2001; 24:1815-1820.
10.
American Diabetes Association. 2004 standards of medical care in diabetes: prevention and management of diabetes complications. Available at: http://care.diabetesjournals.org/cgi/content/full/27/suppLl/s15. Accessed May 3, 2004.
11.
Schectman JM, Schorling JB, Nadkarni MM, et al.Can prescription refill feedback to physicians improve patient adherence?Am J Med Sci. 2004;327:19-24.
12.
Stone EG, Morton SC, Hulscher ME, et al.Interventions that increase use of adult immunization and cancer screening services: a meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med. 2002;136:641-651.
13.
O'Brien T, Oxman AD, Davis DA, et al.Audit and feedback versus alternative strategies: effects on professional practice and health care outcomes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2002; Issue 4.
14.
Weingarten SR, Henning JM, Badamgarav E, et al.Interventions used in disease management programs for patients with chronic illness-which ones work? Meta-analysis of published reports. BMJ2002;325:925-928.
15.
Oxman AD, Thomson MA, Davis DA, et al.No magic bullets: a systematic review of 102 trials of interventions to improve professional practice. CMAJ1995;153:1423-1431.
16.
Renders CM, Valk GD, Griffin S, et al.Interventions to improve the management of diabetes mellitus in primary care, outpatient and community settings. Cochrane Libr. 2002; Issue 4.
17.
Hulscher MEJL, Wensing M, van der Weijden T, et al.Interventions to implement prevention in primary care. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2002; Issue 4.
