Costs of Measuring Outcomes of Acute Hospital Care in a Longitudinal Outcomes Measurement System

Abstract

It is widely acknowledged that the measurement of outcomes of care and the comparison of outcomes over time within health care providers and risk-adjusted comparisons among providers are important parts of improving quality and cost-effectiveness of care. However, few studies have assessed the costs of measuring outcomes of care. We sought to evaluate the personnel and financial resources spent for a prospective assessment of outcomes of acute hospital care by health professionals in internal medicine. The study included 15 primary care hospitals participating in a longitudinal outcomes measurement program and 2005 patients over an assessment period with an average duration of 6 months. Each hospital project manager participated in a previously-tested structured 30-minute telephone interview. Outcome measures include time spent by the individual job titles in implementing and running the outcomes measurement program. Job-title-specific times were used to calculate costs from the hospitals' perspective. One-time costs (C2132 + 1352) and administrative costs (95 97 per week) varied substantially. Costs per patient were fairly stable at around 20. We estimated that the total cost for each hospital to assess outcomes of care for accreditation (10 tracer diagnoses over 6 months) would be 9700 and that continuous monitoring of outcomes (5 tracer diagnoses) would cost 12,400 per year. This study suggests that outcomes of acute hospital care can be assessed with limited resources and that standardized training programs would reduce variability in overall costs. This study should help hospital decision makers to estimate the necessary funding for outcomes measurement initiatives.

Keywords

Costs measurement outcomes research quality of care

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

1. Scanlon DP , Darby C , Rolph E , et al. The role of performance measures for improving quality in managed care organizations. HSR. 2001;36:619-641.

2. Smith F , Gerteis M , Downey N , et al. The effects of disseminating performance data to health plans: results of qualitative research with the Medicare managed care plans. Health Syst Rev. 2001; 36:643-663.

3. Eddy DM . Rationing resources while improving health. How to get more for less. JAMA. 1994; 272:817-824.

4. Peterson ED , DeLong ER , Jollis JG , et al. The effects of New York's bypass surgery provider profiling on access to care and patient outcomes in the elderly. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1998;32:993-999.

5. Lansky D. Improving quality through public disclosure of performance information. Health Aff 2002;21(4):52-62.

6. Daigh RD . Financial implications of a quality improvement process. Top Health Care Financ. 1991;17:47-48.

7. Schneeweiss S , Sangha O , Manstetten A , et al. Identification of outcome indicators for the quality of medical care in hospitals: results of the QMK pilot study. Gesundheitsbkonomie Qualitatsmanage. 2000;5:173-182.

8. Lenz MJ , Hochreutener M-A. Das Projekt LORAS und Qualitatssicherung. Teil 1: Das LORAS Projekt. Zarztl Fortbild Qualitatssich. 2001;95:137-139.

9. Gatsonis CA , Epstein AM , Newhouse JP , et al. Variations in the utilization of coronary angiography for elderly patients with acute myocardial infarction. An analysis using hierarchical logistic regression. Med Care. 1995;33:625-642.

10.

10. Eichenlaub A , Sangha O , Schellschmidt H , et al. QMK-measuring outcomes of acute hospital care. In: Arnold M , Klauber J , Schellschmidt H , eds. Krankenhaus-Report 2001. Stuttgart, Germany: Schattauer; 2001.

11.

11. Schneeweiss S , Sangha O , Manstetten A. Patient centered health status assessment in a longitudinal quality management system. Gesundheitswesen. 2001;63:205-211.

12.

12. Ware JE , Kosinski M , Keller SD . A 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-12): construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity. Med Care. 1996;32:220-233.

13.

13. Greenfield S , Apolone G , McNeil BJ , et al. The importance of coexistent disease in the occurrence of postoperative complications and one-year recovery in patients undergoing total hip replacement. Comorbidity and outcomes after hip replacement. Med Care. 1993;31:141-154.

14.

14. Manstetten A , Liebetrau M , Sangha O , et al. Risk adjustment using morbidity information provided by nurses in epidemiological and economic studies in medical research. Gesundheitsbkonomie Qualitdtsmanage. 2001;6:167-178.

15.

15. Suver JD , Neumann BR , Boles KE . Accounting for the costs of quality. Health Financ Manage. 1992;9:29-37.

16.

16. Armitage P , Berry G. Statistical Methods in Medical Research. 3rd ed. London, England: Blackwell Scientific Publications; 1994.

17.

17. Mukamel DB , Mushlin AI . Quality of care information makes a difference: an analysis of market share and price changes after publication of the New York State Cardiac Surgery Mortality Reports. Med Care. 1998;36:945-954.