The purpose of this study was to identify the ticket distribution practices of professional sport franchises. NBA, NFL, NHL, and MLB franchises were surveyed (n = 113) regarding the use of ticket distribution agencies, which agencies were used, and the advantages and disadvantages of ticket distribution agencies. The results were used, in combination with existing literature, to ascertain the successful strategies employed by ticket distribution agencies that have created for the ticket industry a sustainable competitive niche. The study also looked at customer discontent emanating from ticket distribution practices and regulatory attempts to control the ticket distribution industry. In conclusion, this paper provides the sport manager with 20 suggestions regarding negotiations with ticket distribution agencies.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AguayoR. (1990). Dr. Deming: The American who taughl the Japanese about quality.New York: Simon and Schuster.
2.
BlumenthalR. (1995, August 23). Oddities continue in Pearl Jam's feud with Ticketmaster. The New York Times, p. B1.
3.
BoehlertE. (1995, July 9). Play-by-play account of Pearl Jam saga. Billboard, pp. 85.
4.
CaminitiS. (1988, March 14). Fred Rosen, 44. Forbes, p. 152.
5.
DaviesB. (1992, Aug. 8). 11 tix agencies cited for scalping. Billboard, p. 85.
6.
DiamondT. A. (1982). Ticket scalping: A new look at an old problem. University of Miami Law Review, 37, 71–92.
7.
DresslarT. (1992, April 6). Bass, Ticketmaster: Ticket to gouge. Los Angeles Daily Journal, p.7
8.
EmshwillerJ. R. (1991, June 20). Ticketmaster: A true sports dynasty. The Cincinnati Post, p. 10B.
9.
FatsisS. (1996, June 7). The hottest tickets in town could be fan-fooling fakes. The Wall Street Journal, p. B11.
10.
FTC v. Sperry & Hutchinson Co. 405 U.S. 233 (1972).
11.
GoldbergM. (1990, November 1). Ticket rip-off. Rolling Stone, p.21.
12.
GoodmanF. (1994, October 6). The price is not right: Is Ticketmaster taking these people for a ride?Rolling Stone, pp. 21–22.
13.
GormanJ. & CalhounK. (1994). The name of the game.New York, NY: John Wiley and Sons, Inc.
14.
HofmannD. & GreenbergM. (1989). SportsBiz: An irrelevant look at big business in pro sports.Champaign, IL: Leisure Press.
15.
HollandB. (1994, June 25). House to probe pricing. Billboard, p. 120.
16.
HowardD. R. & CromptonJ. L. (1995). Financing sport. Morgantown, WV: Fitness Information Technology, Inc.
17.
HullT. (1993, Jan. 10). How Marks joined the ticket wars: Bill was one of many prepared by senator's aide. San Francisco Chronicle, p. B4.
18.
KirkpatrickC. (1993, July 26). Scalper schmalper. Newsweek, pp. 56, 57.
19.
McGuireC. R. (1989). The legalenvironment of business. Columbus, OH: Merrill Publishing Company.
20.
Motors, Inc. v. Times Mirror Co. 102 Cal. App. 3d 735, 162 Cal. Rptr. 543 (1980).
21.
Nebbia v. New York, 291 U.S. 502 (1934).
22.
NJ Ass'n of Ticket Br. v. Ticketron, 543 A.2d 997 (N.J. Super. A.d.1988).
23.
PenderK. (1990, March 26). Bass’ grip on ticket sales tightens: Service fees up—suit says it's monopoly. San Francisco Chronicle, pp. CI, C5.
24.
People v. Steele, 231 III. 340, 83 N.E. 236 (1907).
25.
PhilipsC. (1991, May 10). How ticket price adds up. Los Angeles Times, p. F22.
26.
PhilipsC. (1992, June 9). Ticketmaster, target of lawsuits, says it offers broad service. Los Angeles Times, pp. F1, F4.
27.
PiotrowskiM. A. (1993, February 5). Sports Unlimited gets nod as Ticketmaster outlet. Tampa Bay Business journal, p. 7.
28.
QuirkJ. & FortR. (1992). Pay dirt: The business of professional team sports.Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
29.
RosenF. D. (1992, June 22). Convenience: What's it worth?LA Times, p. F3.
30.
RussellD. (1992a, June 27). Ticketmaster is target of 2 class-action antitrust suits. Billboard, pp. 10, 33.
SalantN. (1979). This date in New York Yankee history.New York, NY: Stein and Day.
33.
SepehriM. (1986). Just-in-time, not just in Japan.Falls Church, VA: American Production and Inventory Control System.
34.
SpringG. (1994, October 10). Consumer group hits Ticketmaster over alleged hidden fees. Los Angeles Business Journal, pp. 1, 39.
35.
SternK. E. (1994). The high cost of convenience: Antitrust law violations in the computerized ticketing services industry. Hastings Communication/Entertainment Law Journal, 76, 349–383.
36.
StraussN. (1995 June 10). Ticketmaster cracks down on diversions by outlets. The Courier-Journal SCENE, p. 7.
37.
Ticket Fee Disclosure, 1994: Hearing before the Subcommittee on Transportation and Hazardous Materials of the Committee on Energy and Commerce House of Representatives, 103 rd Cong., 2nd Sess. (1994).
38.
Ticketmaster named in antitrust suit over ticket sales. (1994, May 11). The New York Times, p. D5.
39.
Tyson & Brother v. Banton, 273 U.S. 418 (1927).
40.
Williams v. Standard Oil Co., 278 U.S. 235 (1929).
41.
ZimmermanK. (1989, Jan. 4). Southland Corp. testing machines to distribute tickets. Variety, p. 78.
