Gathering information from and about fans who have attended a sporting event presents a severe data collection challenge. This paper describes a survey method that facilitates the collection of good-quality data and divides the process into two distinct stages. Stage 1 requires an initial contact resulting in the respondents' agreeing to be surveyed. Stage 2 involves the actual interview. One application of the method generated an 84% response rate. The method is discussed with respect to further modifications required to fit specific situations.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BergstenJ., WeeksM.,& BryanF. (1984). Effects of an Advance telephone call. Public Opinion Quarterly, 48, 650–657.
2.
BushA., & HairJ. (1985). An assessment of the mail intercept as a data collection method. Journal of Marketing Research, 22, 158–167.
3.
DillmanD. (1978). Mail and telephone surveys: The total design method. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
FreyJ. H. (1989). Survey research by telephone (2nd Ed.). Beverly Hills: Sage Publications.
6.
GrovesR., & MagilavyL., (1981). Increasing response rates to telephone surveys: A door in the face for foot-in- the-mouth. Public Opinion Quarterly, 45, 346–358.
7.
PolL. (1992). A method to increase response when external interference and times constraints reduce interview quality. Public Opinion Quarterly, 56, 356–359.
8.
ReingemP., & KernanJ. (1977). Compliance with an interview request: A foot-in-the-door self-perception interpretation. Journal of Marketing Research, 14, 365–369.
9.
TraugottM., GrovesM., & LepkowskiJ. (1987). Using dual frame designs to reduce non-response in telephone surveys. Public Opinion Quarterly, 51, 523–539.
