The aim of this study was to explore the impact of self-image congruence (SIC), need for uniqueness (NFU), and limited edition characteristics on sport consumer's attitude toward collaboration in limited edition product settings. The two-factor (product type: limited edition products vs. regular ongoing release products × SIC: actual vs. ideal) between-subjects experimental design was utilized using three experiments with different stimuli (i.e., Nike × Virgil Abloh, Adidas × Alexander Wang, and Puma × Ye). The results indicated that each variable had a strong relationship in separate conditions (i.e., limited edition product, regular ongoing release product). For the theoretical implications, this study extends the sport marketing literature by examining SIC as a binary concept in the sport product collaboration settings. In addition, the current study emphasizes the importance of using collaboration strategy when targeting sport consumers who are familiar with collaboration regardless of the scarcity of products.
AhnT.EkinciY.LiG. (2013). Self-congruence, functional congruence, and destination choice. Journal of Business Research, 66(6), 719–723. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2011.09.009
2.
BartonB.ZlatevskaN.OppewalH. (2022). Scarcity tactics in marketing: A meta-analysis of product scarcity effects on consumer purchase intentions. Journal of Retailing, 98(4), 741–758. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretai.2022.06.003
3.
BrockT. C. (1968). Implications of commodity theory for value change. In GreenwaldA. G.BrockT. C.OstromT. M. (Eds.), Psychological foundations of attitudes (pp. 243–275). Academic Press.
4.
BrownT. A. (2006). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. Guilford Publications.
5.
ByrneB. M. (2016). Structural equation modeling with Amos: Basic concepts, applications, and programming (3rd ed.). Routledge.
6.
CannonC.GoldsmithK.RouxC. (2019). A self-regulatory model of resource scarcity. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 29(1), 104–127. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcpy.1035
7.
ChaeH.KimS.LeeJ.ParkK. (2020). Impact of product characteristics of limited edition shoes on perceived value, brand trust, and purchase intention; focused on the scarcity message frequency. Journal of Business Research, 120, 398–406. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.11.040
8.
CheungG. W.RensvoldR. B. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 9(2), 233–255. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15328007SEM0902_5
9.
ChiengF.SharmaP.KingshottR. P.RoyR. (2022). Interactive effects of self-congruity and need for uniqueness on brand loyalty via brand experience and brand attachment. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 31(6), 870–885. https://doi.org/10.1108/JPBM-12-2020-3250
10.
ChildsM.JinB. E. (2020a). Brand and retailer co-branding: Examining factors to favourably change consumers’ brand evaluations. Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management, 24(1), 49–65. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFMM-03-2019-0061
11.
ChildsM.JinB. E. (2020b). Retailer-brand collaborations: Testing key strategies to increase consumers’ urgency to buy. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 48(4), 380–394. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJRDM-06-2019-0199
12.
DeckerC.BaadeA. (2016). Consumer perceptions of co-branding alliances: Organizational dissimilarity signals and brand fit. Journal of Brand Management, 23(6), 648–665. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41262-016-0013-5
13.
EricksenM. K.SirgyM. J. (1992). Employed females’ clothing preference, self-image congruence, and career anchorage. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 22(5), 408–422. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1992.tb01547.x
FornellC.LarckerD. F. (1981). Structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error: Algebra and statistics. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(3), 382–388. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800313
16.
HairJ. F.BlackW. C.BabinB. J.AndersonR. E. (2010). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.). Prentice Hall.
17.
HallR. J.SnellA. F.FoustM. S. (1999). Item parceling strategies in SEM: Investigating the subtle effects of unmodeled secondary constructs. Organizational Research Methods, 2(3), 233–256. https://doi.org/10.1177/109442819923002
18.
HauserD. J.MossA. J.RosenzweigC.JaffeS. N.RobinsonJ.LitmanL. (2023). Evaluating cloudresearch’s approved group as a solution for problematic data quality on MTurk. Behavior Research Methods, 55(8), 3953–3964. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-022-01999-x
19.
HeoY.PedersenZ. P.WilliamsA. S.ByonK. K. (2023). An examination of consumer’s brand loyalty and purchase intention of collaborations in the sports footwear industry. Sport Marketing Quarterly, 32(4), 320–331. https://doi.org/10.32731/SMQ.324.122023.04
IslamT.AttiqS.HameedZ.KhokharM. N.SheikhZ. (2019). The impact of self-congruity (symbolic and functional) on the brand hate: A study based on self-congruity theory. British Food Journal, 121(1), 71–88. https://doi.org/10.1108/BFJ-03-2018-0206
JaputraA.EkinciY.SimkinL.NguyenB. (2018). The role of ideal self-congruence and brand attachment in consumers’ negative behaviour: Compulsive buying and external trash-talking. European Journal of Marketing, 52(3/4), 683–701. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJM-06-2016-0318
KimK.KoE.LeeM. A.MattilaP.KimH. K. (2014). Fashion collaboration effects on consumer response and customer equity in global luxury and SPA brand marketing. Journal of Global Scholars of Marketing Science, 24(3), 350–364. https://doi.org/10.1080/21639159.2014.913376
26.
KimK. A.ByonK. K.PedersenP. M. (2020). Coping as a mediation mechanism between severity of spectator dysfunctional behavior and revisit intention: The moderating effects of self-construal in sport consumption. Journal of Sport Management, 34(1), 38–52. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsm.2018-0356
27.
KlineR. B. (2015). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (4th ed.). Guilford Publications.
28.
KwakD. H.KangJ. H. (2009). Symbolic purchase in sport: The roles of self-image congruence and perceived quality. Management Decision, 47(1), 85–99. https://doi.org/10.1108/00251740910929713
29.
KwonH. H.KimH.MondelloM. (2008). Does a manufacturer matter in co-branding? The influence of a manufacturer brand on sport team licensed apparel. Sport Marketing Quarterly, 17(3), 163–172. https://doi.org/10.1177/106169340801700305
30.
LadeiraW. J.LimW. M.de Oliveira SantiniF.RasulT.PerinM. G.AltinayL. (2023). A meta-analysis on the effects of product scarcity. Psychology & Marketing, 40(7), 1267–1279. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.21816
31.
LeeD.CottinghamM.PearsonD.KimS. H.ParkJ. (2016). Collaborative strategy in sports industry: Team co-branding. The Service Industries Journal, 36(11-12), 595–613. https://doi.org/10.1080/02642069.2016.1255727
32.
LinG. C.WenZ.MarshH. W.LinH. S. (2010). Structural equation models of latent interactions: Clarification of orthogonalizing and double-mean-centering strategies. Structural Equation Modeling, 17(3), 374–391. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2010.488999
33.
LynnM. (1991). Scarcity effects on value: A quantitative review of the commodity theory literature. Psychology & Marketing, 8(1), 43–57. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.4220080105
34.
MalärL.KrohmerH.HoyerW. D.NyffeneggerB. (2011). Emotional brand attachment and brand personality: The relative importance of the actual and the ideal self. Journal of Marketing, 75(4), 35–52. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.75.4.35
MazodierM.MerunkaD. (2014). Beyond brand attitude: Individual drivers of purchase for symbolic cobranded products. Journal of Business Research, 67(7), 1552–1558. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2014.01.015
37.
OllitervoV.SipiläJ.TerhoH. (2025). The package says more than a thousand words: The effect of eco-labelling and package material on consumer's purchase intentions. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 24(3), 1421–1440. https://doi.org/10.1002/cb.2473
38.
PinelloC.PiconeP. M.Mocciaro Li DestriA. (2022). Co-branding research: Where we are and where we could go from here. European Journal of Marketing, 56(2), 584–621. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJM-02-2021-0073
39.
PodsakoffP. M.MacKenzieS. B.LeeJ. Y.PodsakoffN. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879–903. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879
40.
RaoA. R.RuekertR. W. (1994). Brand alliances as signals of product quality. Sloan Management Review, 36(1), 87–97.
41.
RoyR.SharmaP. (2015). Scarcity appeal in advertising: Exploring the moderating roles of need for uniqueness and message framing. Journal of Advertising, 44(4), 349–359. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2015.1018459
42.
SimoninB. L.RuthJ. A. (1998). Is a company known by the company it keeps? Assessing the spillover effects of brand alliances on consumer brand attitudes. Journal of Marketing Research, 35(1), 30–42. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224379803500105
43.
SirgyM. J. (1982). Self-concept in consumer behavior: A critical review. Journal of Consumer Research, 9(3), 287–300. https://doi.org/10.1086/208924
44.
SpearsN.SinghS. N. (2004). Measuring attitude toward the brand and purchase intentions. Journal of Current Issues & Research in Advertising, 26(2), 53–66. https://doi.org/10.1080/10641734.2004.10505164
StockA.BalachanderS. (2005). The making of a “hot product”: A signaling explanation of marketers’ scarcity strategy. Management Science, 51(8), 1181–1192. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1050.0381
TianK. T.BeardenW. O.HunterG. L. (2001). Consumers’ need for uniqueness: Scale development and validation. Journal of Consumer Research, 28(1), 50–66. https://doi.org/10.1086/321947
49.
TianK. T.McKenzieK. (2001). The long-term predictive validity of the consumers’ need for uniqueness scale. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 10(3), 171–193. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327663jcp1003_5
50.
TodeschiniB. V.CortimigliaM. N.Callegaro-de-MenezesD.GhezziA. (2017). Innovative and sustainable business models in the fashion industry: Entrepreneurial drivers, opportunities, and challenges. Business Horizons, 60(6), 759–770. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2017.07.003
51.
UsakliA.BalogluS. (2011). Brand personality of tourist destinations: An application of self-congruity theory. Tourism Management, 32(1), 114–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2010.06.006
52.
WuG. D.ChalipL. (2013). Expected price and user image for branded and co-branded sports apparel. Sport Marketing Quarterly, 22(3), 138–151. https://doi.org/10.1177/106169341302200305
53.
WuL.LeeC. (2016). Limited edition for me and best seller for you: The impact of scarcity versus popularity cues on self versus other-purchase behavior. Journal of Retailing, 92(4), 486–499. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretai.2016.08.001
54.
YuH. Y.LeeD.CottinghamM.MaengL. (2019). Consumer perceptions to luxury co-branding partnership in sport wearable market. International Journal of Human Movement Science, 13(3), 17–29. https://doi.org/10.23949/ijhms.2019.12.13.3.2
55.
YuH. Y.RobinsonG. M.LeeD. (2021). To partner or not? A study of co-branding partnership and consumers’ perceptions of symbolism and functionality toward co-branded sport products. International Journal of Sports Marketing and Sponsorship, 22(4), 677–698. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSMS-02-2020-0018
56.
ZeithamlV. A. (1988). Consumer perceptions of price, quality, and value: A means-end model and synthesis of evidence. Journal of Marketing, 52(3), 2–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224298805200302
