Previous research on sports rivalry has emphasized fans’ social identity and the threat posed by rivals. Much of this scholarship is based on intercollegiate sports, where many fans, such as students and alumni, have a formally defined identity with the university. In this study fans (N = 4,828) across five major professional leagues—Major League Baseball (MLB), Major League Soccer (MLS), National Basketball Association (NBA), National Football League (NFL), and National Hockey League (NHL)—are surveyed to compare their animosity toward rivals based on four variables: schadenfreude, disidentification, prejudice, and relationship discrimination against rivals. The results consistently demonstrate that NFL fans harbor significantly greater animosity toward rivals than their counterparts in other leagues. Apart from the NFL, fans of NHL teams generally exhibit more animosity compared to other leagues, and NBA fans exhibit the least. While fan identification is relatively consistent across leagues, highly identified fans react more adversely to rivals. These differences in rivalry reactions have implications for promotional planning and event security protocol.
AshmoreR. D., DeauxK., & McLaughlin-VolpeT. (2004). An organizing framework for collective identity: Articulation and significance of multidimensionality. Psychological Bulletin, 130, 80–114.
2.
BeeC, & DalakasV. (2015). Rivalries and sponsor affiliation: Examining the effects of social identity and argument strength on responses to sponsorship-related advertising messages. Journal of Marketing Communications, 21, 408–424.
3.
BenkwitzA., & G. Molnar (2012). Interpreting and exploring football fan rivalries: An overview. Soccer & Society, 13, 479–494.
4.
BergkvistL. (2012). The flipside of the sponsorship coin: Do you still buy the beer when the brewer underwrites a rival team?Journal of Advertising Research, 52, 65–73.
5.
BerriD. J., & SchmidtM. B. (2006). On the road with the National Basketball Association's superstar externality. Journal of Sports Economics, 7, 347–358.
6.
BorlandJ., & Mac DonaldR. (2003). Demand for sport. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 19, 478–502.
7.
BranscombeN. R., & WannD. L. (1992). Physiological arousal and reactions to outgroup members during competitions that implicate an important social identity. Aggressive Behavior, 18, 85–93.
CikaraM., BotvinickM. M., & FiskeS. T. (2011). Us versus them: Social identity shapes neural responses to intergroup competition and harm. Psychological Science, 22, 306–313.
10.
DalakasV., & LevinA. M. (2005). The balance theory domino: How sponsorships may elicit negative consumer attitudes. Advances in Consumer Research, 32, 91–97.
11.
DalakasV., & MelanconJ. P. (2012). Fan identification, schadenfreude toward hated rivals, and the mediating effects of importance of winning index. Journal of Services Marketing, 26, 51–59.
12.
DmowskiS. (2013). Geographical typology of European football rivalries. Soccer & Society, 14, 331–343.
13.
DovidioJ. F., & GaertnerS. L. (1999). Reducing prejudice: Combating intergroup biases. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 8(4), 101–105.
14.
ElsbachK. D., & BhattacharyaC. B. (2001). Defining who you are by what you're not: Organizational disidentification and the National Rifle Association. Organization Science, 12, 393–413.
15.
FestingerL. (1954). A theory of social comparison process,Human Relations, 7, 114–140.
16.
GuilianottiR., BonneyN., & HepworthM. (Eds.). (2005). Football, violence and social identity. New York, NY: Routledge.
17.
GwinnerK., & SwansonS. R. (2003). A model of fan identification: Antecedents and sponsorship outcomes. Journal of Services Marketing, 17, 275–294.
18.
HavardC. T. (2014). Glory out of reflected failure: The examination of how rivalry affects sport fans. Sport Management Review, 17, 243–253.
19.
HavardC. T., EddyT. W., & RyanT. D. (2016). Examining the impact of team identification and gender on rival perceptions and consumption intentions of intercollegiate athletics fans. Journal of Applied Sport Management, 8(2), 33–49.
20.
HavardC. T., GrayD. P., GouldJ., SharpL. A., & SchafferJ. J. (2013). Development and validation of the Sport Rivalry Fan Perception Scale (SRFPS). Journal of Sport Behavior, 36, 45–65.
21.
HavardC. T., WannD. L., & RyanT. D. (2013). Investigating the impact of conference realignment on rivalry in intercollegiate athletics,Sport Marketing Quarterly, 22, 224–234.
22.
HeiderF. (1958). The psychology of interpersonal relations. New York, NY: Wiley
23.
KilduffG. J. (2014). Driven to win: Rivalry, motivation, and performance. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 5, 944–952.
24.
KilduffG., ElfenbeinH., & StawB. (2010). The psychology of rivalry: A relationally dependent analysis of competition,Academy of Management Journal, 53, 943–969.
25.
LeeM. J. (1985). From rivalry to hostility among sport fans. Quest, 37, 38–49.
26.
LevinA., CobbsJ., BeasleyF., & ManolisC. (2013). Ad nauseam? Sports fans’ acceptance of commercial messages during televised sporting events. Sport Marketing Quarterly, 22, 193–202.
27.
LevineM., ProsserA., EvansD., & ReicherS. (2005). Identity and emergency intervention: How social group membership and inclusiveness of group boundaries shape helping behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 443–453.
28.
MaassA., SalviD., ArcuriL., & SeminG. (1989). Language use in intergroup contexts: The linguistic intergroup bias. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 981–993.
29.
MaelF., & AshforthB. E. (1992). Alumni and their alma mater: A partial test of the reformulated model of organizational identification. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 13, 103–123.
30.
McDonaldM., & RascherD. A. (2000). Does bat day make cents? The effect of promotions on the demand for baseball. Journal of Sport Management, 14, 8–27.
NathanD. (2010). We were about winning: Larry Bird, Magic Johnson, and the rivalry that remade the NBA. In WigginsD. K. & RodgersR. P. (Eds.), Rivals: Legendary matchups that made sports history (pp. 69–107). Fayetteville, AR: The University of Arkansas Press.
PettigrewT. F., & MeertensR. W. (1995). Subtle and blatant prejudice in western Europe. European Journal of Social Psychology, 25, 57–75.
37.
StetsJ. E., & BurkeP. J. (2000). Identity theory and social identity theory. Social Psychology Quarterly, 63, 224–237.
38.
TainskyS., & JasielecM. (2014). Television viewership of out-of-market games in league markets: Traditional demand shifters and local team influence. Journal of Sport Management, 28, 94–108.
39.
TajfelH. (1969). Cognitive aspects of prejudice,Journal of Social Issues, 25(4), 75–97.
40.
TajfelH. (1974). Social identity and intergroup behavior. Social Science Information, 13(2), 65–93.
41.
TajfelH., & TurnerJ. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In AustinW. G. & WorchelS. (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33–48). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth, Inc.
42.
TurnerJ. C. (1975). Social comparison and social identity: Some prospects for intergroup behavior. European Journal of Social Psychology, 5, 5–34.
43.
TylerB. D., & CobbsJ. (2015). Rival conceptions of rivalry: Why some competitions mean more than others. European Sport Management Quarterly, 15, 227–248.
44.
TylerB. D., & CobbsJ. (2017). All rivals are not equal: Clarifying misrepresentations and discerning three core properties of rivalry. Journal of Sport Management, 31, 1–14.
45.
WannD. L., & DolanT. J. (1994). Attributions of highly identified sports spectators. Journal of Social Psychology, 134, 783–792.
46.
WannD. L., GrieveG. F., ZapalacK. R., & PeaceG. D. (2008). Motivational profiles of sport fans of different sports. Sport Marketing Quarterly, 17, 6–19.
47.
WannD. L., HavardC. T., GrieveF. G., LanterJ. R., PartridgeJ. A., & ZapalacR. K. (2016). Investigating sport rivals: Number, evaluations and relationship with team identification. The Journal of Fandom Studies, 4, 71–88.
48.
WannD. L., HaynesG., McLeanB., & PullenP. (2003). Sport team identification and willingness to consider anonymous acts of hostile aggression. Aggressive Behavior, 29, 406–413.
49.
WannD. L., PetersonR. R., CothranC, & DykesM. (1999). Sport fan aggression and anonymity: The importance of team identification. Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 27, 567–602.
