The purpose of this study was to determine the impact that flow and team identification have on spectators’ perceptions of stadium atmosphere. Data were collected from students attending mens basketball and baseball games at a large NCAA Division I university. The results indicated that stadium flow is directly related to spectators’ perceptions of the stadium atmosphere. Team identification was found to influence flow and also have a moderating effect in the model with stadium flow having a greater impact on lower-identified spectators than on highly identified fans.
AndersonJ. C, & GerbingD. W. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 411–423.
2.
AshmoreR. D., DeauxK., & McLaughlin-VolpeT. (2004). An organizing framework for collective identity: Articulation and significance of multidimensionality. Psychological Bulletin, 130, 80–114.
3.
BakerT., & JonesS. A. (2011). The inevitable queue: Exploringthe impact of wait time at sporting events. International Journal of Sports Marketing & Sponsorship, 13, 49–59.
4.
BaronR. M., & KennyD. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173–1182.
5.
BentlerP. M. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 238–246.
6.
CarùA., & CovaB. (2006). How to facilitate immersion in a consumption experience: Appropriation operations and service elementsJournal of Consumer Behaviour, 5, 4–14.
7.
ChanavatN., & BodetG. (2014). Experiential marketing in sport spectatorship services: A customer perspective. European Sport Management Quarterly, 14, 323–344.
8.
CraikK. H. (1973). Environmental psychology. Annual Review of Psychology, 24, 403–422.
9.
CsikszentmihalyiM. (1990). Flow: The psychology of optimal experience. New York, NY: Harper & Row.
10.
CsikszentmihalyiM., & LarsonR. (2014). Validity and reliability of the experience-sampling method. Flow and the foundations of positive psychology (pp. 35–54). Heidelberg, Germany: Springer Netherlands.
FinneyS. J., & Di StefanoC. (2006). Non-normal and categorical data in structural equation modeling. In HancockG. R. & MuellerR. O. (Eds.), Structural equation modeling: A second course (pp. 269–314). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.
13.
FornellC, & LarckerD. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18, 39–50.
14.
GreenwellT. C, GreenhalghG., & StoverN. (2013). Understanding spectator expectations: An analysis of niche sports. International Journal of Sport Management and Marketing, 13, 144–157.
15.
HeereB., JamesJ. D., YoshidaM., & ScreminG. (2011). The effect of associated group identities on team identity. Journal of Sport Management, 25, 606–621.
16.
HightowerR., BradyM. K., & BakerT. L. (2002). Investigating the role of the physical environment in hedonic service consumption: An exploratory study of sporting events. Journal of Business Research, 55, 697–707.
17.
HoustonM. J., & RothschildM. L. (1978). Conceptual and methodological perspectives on involvement. Research Frontiers in Marketing: Dialogues and Directions, 184, 262–270.
18.
HuL., & BentlerP. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: Multidisciplinary A. Journal, 6, 1–55.
19.
JacksonS. A., & EklundR. C. (2002). Assessing flow in physical activity: The flow state scale-2 and dispositional flow scale-2. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 24, 133–150.
20.
JamesJ. D., & RossS. D. (2002). The motives of sport consumers: A comparison of Major and Minor League Baseball. International Journal of Sport Management, 3, 180–198.
21.
KimY., LeeH.-W, & MagnusenM. (2013). A meta-analytic review of the factors affecting sport consumer consumption behaviors. Paper presented at the Annual Conference of North American Society of Sport Mangement, Austin, TX.
KleinA. G., & MoosbruggerH. (2000). Maximum likelihood estimation of latent interaction effects with the LMS method. Psychometrika, 65, 457–474.
24.
KleinA. G., & MuthénB. O. (2007). Quasi-maximum likelihood estimation of structural equation models with multiple interaction and quadratic effects. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 42, 647–673.
25.
LeeH.-W, KimY. D., NewmanJ. I., & KimY. (2013). Group emotion in spectator sport: An interdisciplinary approach to affective qualia. Journal of Multidisciplinary Research, 5, 49–66.
26.
LeeH.-W, ShinS., BundsK. S., KimM., & ChoK. M. (2013). Rediscovering the positive psychology of sport participation: Happiness in a ski resort context. Applied Research in Quality of Life, 9, 575–590.
27.
LeeS., LeeH. J., SeoW. J., & GreenC. (2012). A new approach to stadium experience: The dynamics of the sensoryscape, social interaction, and sense of home. Journal of Sport Management, 26, 490–505.
28.
MaclinE. L., MathewsonK. E., LowK. A., BootW. R., KramerA. F., FabianiM., & GrattonG. (2011). Learningto multitask: Effects of video game practice on electrophysiological indices of attention and resource allocation. Psychophysiology, 48, 1173–1183.
29.
MadrigalR. (2003). Investigating an evolving leisure experience: Antecendents and consequences of spectator affect during a live sporting event. Journal of Leisure Research, 35, 23–48.
30.
MadrigalR. (2006). Measuring the multidimensional nature of sporting event performance consumption. Journal of Leisure Research, 38, 267–292.
31.
MadrigalR., & ChenJ. (2008). Moderating and mediating effects of team identification in regard to causal attributions and summary judgments following a game outcome. Journal of Sport Management, 22, 717–733.
MehrabianA., & RussellJ. A. (1974). An approach to environmental psychology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
34.
MonetaG. B. (2012). On the measurement and conceptualization of flow. In EngeserS. (Ed.), Advances in flow research (pp. 23–50). New York, NY: Springer.
35.
MullerD., JuddC. M., & YzerbytV. Y. (2005). When moderation is mediated and mediation is moderated. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 852–863.
36.
NakamuraJ., & CsikszentmihalyiM. (2014). The concept of flow. Flow and the foundations of positive psychology (pp. 239–263). Heidelberg, Germany: Springer Netherlands.
37.
NiedenthalP. M., & BrauerM. (2012). Social functionality of human emotionAnnual Review of Psychology, 63, 259–285.
38.
PettyR. E., & CacioppoJ. T. (1981). Issue involvement as a moderator of the effects on attitude of advertising content and context. Advances in Consumer Research, 8, 20–24.
39.
PettyR. E., & CacioppoJ. T. (1986). The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. Communication and Persuasion (pp. 1–24). New York, NY: Springer.
40.
PodsakoffP. M., Mac KenzieS. B., Lee, J.-Y, & PodsakofN. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 879–903.
41.
RaykovT. (1997). Estimation of composite reliability for congeneric measures. Applied Psychological Measurement, 21, 173–184.
42.
BrodieR. J., HollebeekL. D., JurićB., & IlićA. (2011). Customer engagement: Conceptual domain, fundamental propositions, and implications for research. Journal of Service Research, 14, 252–271.
43.
SaegertS., & WinkelG. H. (1990). Environmental psychology. Annual Review of Psychology, 41, 441–477.
44.
SatorraA., & BentlerP. M. (1994). Corrections to test statistics and standard errors in covariance structure analysis. In EyeA. V. & CloggC. C. (Eds.), Latent variables analysis: Applications for developmental research (pp. 399–419). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
45.
SeligmanM. E. P. (2011). Flourish: A visionary new understanding of happiness and well-being. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster, Inc.
46.
ShernoffD. J., CsikszentmihalyiM., ShneiderB., & ShernoffE. S. (2003). Student engagement in high school classrooms from the perspective of flow theory. School Psychology Quarterly, 18, 158–176.
47.
SloanL. R. (1989). The motives of sports fans. In GoldsteinJ. D. (Ed.), Sports, games, and play: Social and psychosocial viewpoints (pp. 175–240). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
48.
SteigerJ. H. (1990). Structural model evaluation and modification: An interval estimation approach. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 25, 173–180.
49.
TajfelH. (1982). Social psychology of intergroup relations. Annual Review of Psychology, 33, 1–39.
50.
ThompsonM. S., & GreenS. B. (2006). Evaluating between-group differences in latent variable means. In HancockG. R. & MuellerR. O. (Eds.), Structural equation modeling: A second course (pp. 119–169). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing, Inc.
51.
TrailG. T., AndersonD. F., & FinkJ. S. (2005). Consumer satisfaction and identity theory: A model of sport spectator conative loyaltySport Marketing Quarterly, 14, 98–111.
52.
TrailG. T., & JamesJ. D. (2001). The motivation scale for sport consumption: Assessment of the scale's psychometric properties. Journal of Sport Behavior, 24, 108–127.
53.
TrailG. T., KimY., KwonH. H., HarrolleM. G., Braunstein-Mink-oveJ. R., & DickR. (2012). The effects of vicarious achievement on BIRGing and CORFing: Testing moderating and mediating effects of team identification. Sport Management Review, 15, 345–354.
54.
TuckerL. R., & LewisC. (1973). A reliability coefficient for maximum likelihood factor analysis. Psychometrika, 38, 1–10.
55.
UhrichS., & BenkensteinM. (2010). Sport stadium atmosphere: Formative and reflective indicators for operationalizing the construct. Journal of Sport Management, 24, 211–237.
56.
UhrichS., & BenkensteinM. (2012). Physical and social atmospheric effects in hedonic service consumption: Customers’ roles at sporting events. TheService Industries Journal, 32, 1741–1757.
57.
VeerasawmyR., & IversenO. S. (2012, October). BannerBattle: Introducing crowd experience to interaction design. InProceedings of the 7th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction: Making sense through design (pp. 228–237). New York, NY: ACM Press.
58.
WakefieldK. L., & BlodgettJ. G. (1996). The effect of the servi-cescape on customers’ behavioral intentions in leisure service settingsJournal of Services Marketing, 10(6), 45–61.
59.
WakefieldK. L., & SloanH. J. (1995). The effects of team loyalty and selected stadium factors on spectator attendance. Journal of Sport Management, 9, 153–172.
60.
WannD. L. (2006). Understanding the positive social psychological benefits of sport team identification: The team identification-social psychological health model. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 10, 272–296.
61.
WannD. L., & BranscombeN. R. (1990). Die-hard and fair-weather fans: Effects of identification on BIRGing and CORFing tendenciesJournal of Sport & Social Issues, 14, 103–117.
62.
WesterbeekH. M., & ShilburyD. (1999). Increasing the focus on “place” in the marketing mix for facility dependent sport services. Sport Management Review, 2, 1–23.
63.
WestlandJ. C. (2010). Lower bounds on sample size in structural equation modeling. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 9, 476–487.
64.
YoshidaM., & JamesJ. D. (2010). Customer satisfaction with game and service experiences: Antecedents and consequences. Journal of Sport Management, 24, 338–361.
65.
ZillmannD., BryantJ., & SapolskyB. S. (1989). Enjoyment from sports spectatorship. In GoldsteinJ. H. (Ed.), Sports, games, and play: Social and psychological viewpoints (2nd ed., pp. 241–278). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
