On Second Thought … Recent Decisions Continue to Reshape Intellectual Property Landscape

Baker T. A. , & Byon K. K. (2011). The Fourth Circuit's application of the fair use doctrine in Bouchat v. Baltimore Ravens Ltd. P'Ship. Sport Marketing Quarterly, 20, 112–114.

Bolger v. Youngs Drug Products, Corp., 463 U.S. 60 (1983).

Bouchat v. Baltimore Ravens Limited Partnership, 619 F.3d 301 (4th Cir. 2010).

Bouchat v. Baltimore Ravens Limited Partnership, 737 F.3d 932 (4th Cir. 2013).

Calboli I. (2011). The case for a limited protection of trademark merchandising. University of Illinois Law Review, 11, 865–913.

Copyright Act of 1976, 17 U.S.C. §101 et seq. (2000).

Dogan S. L. , & Lemley M. A. (2005). The merchandising right: Fragile theory or fait accompli? Emory Law Journal, 54, 461–524.

Gardner E. (2013). Why Hollywood studios care about the Baltimore Ravens logo. The Hollywood Reporter. Retrieved from http://www.holly-woodreporter.com/thr-esq/nfls-baltimore-ravens-logo-why-435543

Goins J. (2012). Jordan v. Jewel Food Stores, Inc.: Do the shoes make the man? Sport Marketing Quarterly, 21, 253–255.

Grady J. (2010). New Life Art decision breathes new life into artists’ First Amendment rights. Sport Marketing Quarterly, 19, 48–50.

Greene T. (2013, Dec. 18). Fourth Circuit finds fair use for NFL in Baltimore Ravens documentary. Stanford Law School Center for Internet and Society. Retrieved from http://cyberlaw.stanford.edu/blog/2013/12/fourth-circuit-finds-fair-use-nfl-baltimore-ravens-docu-mentary-case

Jordan v. Jewel Food Stores, Inc., 851 F. Supp. 2d 1102 (N.D. Ill. 2012), remanded, (743 F.3d 509 7th Cir. 2014).

McKelvey S. , & Sliffman A. (in press). The merchandising right gone awry: What “Moore” can be said? American Business Law Journal.

University of Alabama Bd. of Trustees vs. New Life Art, Inc., 677 F. Supp. 2d 1238 (N.D. Ala. 2009); 683 F.3d 1266 (11th Cir. 2012); on remand, 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 139864 (2013).