The current study quantitatively investigated how fan perceptions and willingness to consider committing anonymous acts of aggression toward participants of the rival teams differed between a rival in a current conference and an anticipated one in a new conference. A sample of 168 online fans of teams affected by conference realignment were administered a survey containing the Sport Rivalry Fan Perception Scale (SRFPS: Havard, Gray, Gould, Sharp, & Schaffer, 2013) and questions regarding willingness to consider committing anonymous acts of aggression (Wann, Haynes, McLean, & Pullen, 2003; Wann, Petersen, Cothran, & Dykes, 1999; Wann & Waddill, in press). Two-way MANOVA revealed significant differences existed regarding one SRFPS subscale, and ANOVA indicated that fans were more likely to consider committing anonymous acts of aggression toward participants of the current than anticipated rival team. Discussion centers on academic and sport marketing implications of the findings and potential areas for future research.
AshmoreR. D., DeauxK., & McLaughlin-VolpeT. (2004). An organizing framework for collective identity: Articulation and significance of multi-dimensionality. Psychological Bulletin, 130, 80–114.
3.
BanduraA. (1977). Self efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 8, 191–215.
BizmanA., & YinonY. (2002). Engaging in distancing tactics among sport fans: Effects on self-esteem ad emotional responses. The Journal of Social Psychology, 142, 381–392.
6.
BranscombeN. R., EllemersN., SpearsR., & DoosjeB. (1999). The context and content of social identity threat. In EllemersN., SpearsR., & DoosjeB. (Eds.), Social identity (pp. 35–58). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
7.
CialdiniR. B., BordenR. J., ThorneA., WalkerM. R., FreemanS., & SloanL. R. (1976). Basking in reflected glory: Three (football) field studies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 34, 366–375.
8.
CialdiniR. B., & RichardsonK. D. (1980). Two indirect tactics of impression management: Basking and blasting. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 406–415.
9.
DaviesF., VeloutsouC., & CostaA. (2006). Investigating the influence of a joint sponsorship of rival teams on supporter attitudes and brand preferences. Journal of Marketing Communication, 12, 31–48.
10.
DimmockJ. A., & GroveJ. R. (2005). Relationship of fan identification to determinants of aggression. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 17, 37–47.
11.
DimmockJ. A., & GucciardiD. F. (2008). The utility of modern theories of intergroup bias for research on antecedents to team identification. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 9, 284–300.
12.
DwyerB., EddyT., HavardC., & BraaL. (2010). Stakeholder perceptions of an athletic program's reclassification from NCAA Division II to NCAA Division I (FCS) membership: A case study. Journal of Issues in Intercollegiate Athletics, 3, 76–97. Retrieved from http://csri-jiia.org/
13.
GaiserT. J., & SchreinerA. E. (2009). A guide to conducting online research. London: Sage Publications Ltd.
14.
GibsonH., WillmingC., & HoldnakA. (2002). “We're Gators…Not just Gator fans”: Serious leisure and University of Florida football. Journal of Leisure Research, 34, 397–425.
15.
HavardC. T. (in press). Glory Out of Reflected Failure: The examination of how rivalry affects sport fans. Sport Management Review.
16.
HavardC. T., GrayD. P., GouldJ., SharpL. A., & SchafferJ. R. (2013). Development and validation of the Sport Rivalry Fan Perception Scale (SRFPS). Journal of Sport Behavior, 36, 45–65.
17.
HeiderF. (1958). The psychology of interpersonal relations. New York, NY: Wiley.
18.
HillmanC. H., CuthbertB. N., BradleyM. M., & LangP. J. (2004). Motivated engagement to appetitive and aversive fanship cues: Psychophysiological responses of rival sport fans. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 26, 338–351.
19.
HoltD. B. (1995). How consumers consume: A typology of consumption practices. Journal of Consumer Research, 22, 1–16.
20.
HornseyM. J., & JetenJ. (2004). The individual within the group: Balancing the need to belong with the need to be different. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 8, 248–264.
21.
JettenJ., SpearsR., & MansteadA. S. R. (1999). Group distinctiveness and intergroup discrimination. In EllemersN., SpearsR., & DoosjeB. (Eds.), Social identity (pp. 107–126). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
22.
KahleL. R., & CloseA. G. (2011). Consumer behavior knowledge for effective sports and event marketing. New York, NY: Taylor and Francis Group, LLC.
KilduffG. J., ElfenbeinH. A., & StawB. M. (2010). The psychology of rivalry: A relationally dependent analysis of competition. Academy of Management Journal, 53, 943–969.
LeeM. J. (1985). From rivalry to hostility among sports fans. Quest, 38–49.
27.
LevineM., ProsserA., EvansD., & ReicherS. (2005). Identity and emergency intervention: How social group membership and inclusiveness of group boundaries shape helping behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 343–353.
28.
LewisJ. M. (2007). Sports fan violence in North America. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littleton Publishers, Inc.
29.
LuellenT. B., & WannD. L. (2010). Rival salience and sport team identification. Sport Marketing Quarterly, 19, 97–106.
30.
MaassA., SalviD., ArcuriL., & SeminG. (1989). Language use in inter-group contexts: The linguistic intergroup bias. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 981–993.
31.
MahonyD. F., & MoormanA. M. (1999). The impact of fan attitudes on intentions to watch professional basketball teams on television. Sport Management Review, 2, 43–66.
MowenJ. C. (2004). Exploring the trait of competitiveness and its consumer behavior consequences. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 14(1&2), 52–63.
34.
NoelJ. G., WannD. L., & BranscombeN. R. (1995). Peripheral ingroup membership status and public negativity toward outgroups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 127–137.
SheriffM., HarveyO. J., WhiteB. J., HoodW. R., & SheriffC. W. (1961). Intergroup conflict and cooperation: The Robber's Cave experiment. Norman, OK: The University of Oklahoma.
39.
SierraJ. J., TauteH. A., & HeiserR. S. (2010). Personal opinions and beliefs as determinants of collegiate football consumption for revered and hated teams. Sport Marketing Quarterly, 19, 143–153.
40.
SnyderC. R., & FromkinH. L. (1980). Uniqueness: The human pursuit of difference. New York, NY: Plenum.
41.
SnyderC. R., LassegardM., & FordC. E. (1986). Distancing after group success and failure: Basking in reflected glory and cutting off reflected failure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 382–388.
42.
TabachnickB. G., & FidellL. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics. Boston, MA: Pearson Education, Inc.
43.
TajfelH. (1981). Human groups and social categories. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
44.
TajfelH., & TurnerJ. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In AustinW.G. & WorchelS. (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33–48). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth, Inc.
45.
TurnerJ. C. (1982). Towards a cognitive redefinition of the social group. In TajfelH (Ed.), Social identity and intergroup relations (pp. 15–40). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
46.
WannD. L., & BranscombeN. R. (1990). Die-hard and fair-weather fans: Effects of identification of BIRGing and CORFing tendencies. Journal of Sport and Social Issues, 14, 103–117.
47.
WannD. L., & BranscombeN. R. (1993). Sports fans: Measuring degree of identification with the team. International Journal of Sport Psychology, 24, 1–17.
48.
WannD. L., & DolanT. J. (1994). Spectators’ evaluations of rival and fellow fans. The Psychological Record, 44, 351–358.
49.
WannD. L., & GrieveF. G. (2005). Biased evaluations of in-group and out-group spectator behavior at sporting events: The importance of team identification and threats to social identity. The Journal of Social Psychology, 145, 531–545.
50.
WannD. L., HaynesG., McLeanB., & PullenP. (2003). Sport team identification and willingness to consider anonymous acts of hostile aggression. Aggressive Behavior, 29, 406–413.
51.
WannD. L., KochK., KnothT., FoxD., AljubailyH., & LantzC. D. (2006). The impact of team identification on biased predictions of player performance. The Psychological Record, 56, 55–66.
52.
WannD. L., PetersonR. R., CothranC., & DykesM. (1999). Sport fan aggression and anonymity: The importance of team identification. Social Behavior and Personality, 27, 567–602.
53.
WannD. L., & WaddillP. J. (in press). Predicting sport fans’ willingness to consider anonymous acts of aggression: Importance of team identification and fan dysfunction. In MohiyeddiniC (Ed.), Psychology of sports. Hauppauge, NY: Nova.
ZillmanD., & CantorJ. R. (1976). A disposition theory of humor and mirth. In ChapmanT. & FootH. (Eds.), Humor and laughter: Theory, research, and application (pp. 93–115). London, UK: Wiley.
56.
ZillmanD., BryantJ., & Sapolsky (1989). Enjoyment from sports specta-torship. In GoldsteinJ (Ed.), Sports, games, and play: Social and psychological viewpoints (2nd ed.) (pp. 241–278). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.
