AndreoniJ., & VesterlundL. (2001). Which is the fair sex? Gender differences in altruism. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 116(1), 293–312.
2.
BillingJ. E., HoltD., & SmithJ. (1985). Athletic fund-raising: Exploring the motives behind donations.Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press.
3.
BrausP. (1994). Will boomers give generously?American Demographics, 48, 50, 52, 57.
4.
BrownT. A. (2006). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
5.
CeluchK., & TaylorS. A. (1999). Involvement with services: An empirical replication and extension of Zaichkowsky's personal involvement inventory. Journal of Consumer Satisfaction, Dissatisfaction, and Complaining Behavior, 12, 109–122.
6.
CoughlinC.C., & EreksonO. H. (1985). Contributions to intercollegiate athletic programs: Further evidence. Social Science Quarterly, 66(1), 194–202.
7.
CronbachL. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16(3), 297–334.
8.
DaughtreyC., & StotlarD. K. (2000). Donations: Are they affected by a football championship?Sport Marketing Quarterly, 9(4), 185–193.
9.
Duarte SilvaP. A., & StamA. (1995). Discriminant analysis. In GrimmL. G. & YarnoldP. R. (Eds.), Reading and understanding multivariate statistics (pp. 277–318). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
10.
FornellC., & LarckerD. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18, 39–50.
11.
FulksD. L. (2008). 2004-2006 NCAA revenue and expenses of Division I intercollegiate athletic programs report. Indianapolis, IN: National Collegiate Athletic Association.
12.
Giving USA (2009, June). U.S. charitable giving estimated to be $307.65 billion in 2008. Glenview, IL: Author.
13.
GladdenJ. M., MahonyD. F., & ApostolopoulouA. (2005). Toward a better understanding of college athletic donors: What are the primary motives?Sport Marketing Quarterly, 14(1), 18–30.
14.
HallH. (2004). Gender differences in giving: Going, going, gone?New Directions for Philanthropic Fundraising.43, 71–81.
15.
HuL., & BentlerP. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1–55.
16.
HumphreysB. R. & MondelloM. (2007). Intercollegiate athletic success and donations at NCAA Division I institutions. Journal of Sport Management, 21(2), 265–280.
17.
KaplanA. E., & HayesM. J. (1993). What we know about women as donors. In von SchlegellA. J. & FisherJ. M. (Eds.), New directions for philanthropic fundraising: Women as donors, women as philanthropists (pp. 5–20). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
18.
KottaszR. (2004). Differences in the donor behavior characteristics of young affluent males and females: Empirical evidence from Britain. InternationalJournal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 15(2), 181–203
19.
LaurentG., & KapfererJ. N. (1985). Measuring consumer involvement profiles. Journal of Marketing Research, 22, 41–53.
20.
MahonyD. F., GladdenJ. M., & FunkD. C. (2003). Examining athletic donors at NCAA Division I institutions. International Sports Journal, 7(1), 9–27.
21.
MarxJ. D. (2000). Women and human services. Social Work, 45, 27–38.
22.
MeschD. J., RooneyP. M., SteinbergK. S., DentonB. (2006). The effects of race, gender, and marital status on giving and volunteering in Indiana. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 35(4), 565–587.
23.
NewmanR. (2000). Gender differences in philanthropy. Fund Raising Management, 28–29.
24.
ParkC. W., & YoungS. M. (1983). Types and levels of involvement and brand attitude formation. In BagozziR. P & TyboutA. M. (Eds.), Advances in consumer research, 10, 320-324, Ann Arbor, MI: Association for Consumer Research.
25.
RothchildM. L. (1984). Perspectives on involvement: Current problems and future directions. Advances in Consumer Research, 11, 216–217.
26.
ShawS. C. (1992). Communicating with women: Understanding and applying the differences. In von SchlegellA. J. & FisherJ. M. (Eds.), New directions for philanthropic fundraising: Women as donors, women as philanthropists. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
27.
ShawS. C., & TaylorM. A. (1995). Reinventing fundraising: Realizing the potential of women's philanthropy.San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
28.
SherifM., & CantrilH. (1947). The psychology of ego involvements, social attitudes and identifications. New York: Wiley.
29.
SherifM., & HovlandC. I. (1961). Social judgment: Assimilation and contrast effects in reaction to communication and attitude change.New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
30.
SigelmanL., & BookheimerS. (1983). Is it whether you win or lose? Monetary contributions to big-time college athletic programs. Social Science Quarterly, 64(2), 347–359.
31.
SigelmanL., & CarterR. (1979). Win one for the giver? Alumni giving and big-time college sports. Social Science Quarterly, 60(2), 284–294.
32.
SommerfeldM. (2000, October 5). A close look at ways to increase giving by women and to instill the habit in girls. Chronicle of Philanthropy, p. 12.
33.
StaffordM. R., & DayE. (1995). Measuring service involvement: A preliminary assessment. American Marketing Association Educators’ Proceedings, 6, 75–80.
34.
StaurowskyE. J. (1996). Women and athletic fund raising: Exploring the connection between gender and giving. Journal of Sport Management, 10, 401–416.
35.
StaurowskyE. J., ParkhouseB., & SachsM. (1996). Developing an instrument to measure athletic donor behavior and motivation. Journal of Sport Management, 10, 262–277.
36.
StinsonJ. L., & HowardD. R. (2004). Scoreboards vs. mortarboards: Major donor behavior and intercollegiate athletics. Sport Marketing Quarterly, 13(3), 129–140.
37.
StinsonJ. L., & HowardD. R. (2007). Athletic success and private giving to athletic and academic programs at NCAA institutions. Journal of Sport Management, 21, 235–264.
38.
StoneK., & SublettD. (1992). The UCLA women and philanthropy focus groups. Los Angeles: University of California at Los Angeles.
TabachnickB. G., & FidellL. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics (5th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson Education.
41.
TaylorM. A., & ShawS. C. (1997). Women as philanthropists: Leading the transformation in major gift fundraising. New Directions for Philanthropic Fundraising, 16, 61–74
42.
ThompsonB. (2004). Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis: Understanding concepts and applications. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
TsiotsouR. (2004). The role of involvement and income in predicting large and small donations to college athletics. International Journal of Sports Marketing & Sponsorship, 6(2), 117–123.
45.
TsiotsouR. (2006). Investigating differences between female and male athletic donors. International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing, 11(3), 209–223.
46.
VernerM. E. (1996). Developing women as financial donors and philanthropists: A way to enhance intercollegiate athletics opportunities. Women in Sport and Physical Activity Journal, 5(1), 29–49.
47.
WileyC. E., ShawS. M., & HavitzM. E. (2000). Men's and women's involvement in sports: An examination of the gendered aspects of leisure involvement. Leisure Sciences, 22, 19–31.
48.
ZaichkowskyJ. L. (1985). Measuring the involvement construct. Journal of Consumer Research, 12, 341–352.
49.
ZaichkowskyJ. L. (1994). The personal involvement inventory: Reduction, revision, and application to advertising. Journal of Advertising, 23(4), 59–70.
50.
ZgoncE. (2010). NCAA: 1981-82 - 2008-09 NCAA Sports Sponsorship and Participation Rates Report. Indianapolis, IN: The National Collegiate Athletic Association.