American Needle, Inc. v. New Orleans Louisiana Saints, 496 F. Supp. 2d 941 (N.D. Ill. 2007).
2.
th American Needle v. National Football League, 538 F.3d 736 (7 Cir. 2008).
3.
American Needle v. National Football League, 2000 U.S. LEXIS 4899 (U.S., June 29, 2009).
4.
Distribution B.C.C. & Marketing, Inc. v. Major League Baseball Advanced
5.
th Media, L.P., 505 F.3d 818 (8 Cir. 2007).
6.
EdelmanM. (2008). Why the “single entity” defense can never apply to NFL Clubs: A primer on property-rights theory in professional sports. Fordham Intellectual Property, Media & Entertainment Law Journal, 18, 891–927.
EdmondsE. (2009, August 6). Topps and Major League Baseball to announce exclusive deals staring 2010. Sports Law Blog. Retrieved on August 9, 2009, from http://sports-law.blogspot.com/
9.
FisherE. (2009, July 27). No licensing deal, no problem for publishers of these video game titles. SportsBusiness Journal. Retrieved August 7, 2009, from http://www.sportsbusinessjournal.com/article/63125
GradyJ. (2007). Fantasy stats case tests limits of intellectual property protection in the digital age. Sport Marketing Quarterly, 16(4), 230–232.
12.
GrowN. (2008, Spring). A proper analysis of the National Football League under Section One of the Sherman Act. Texas Review of Entertainment and Sports Law, 9, 281–305.
International Licensing Industry Merchandisers’ Association. (2009). Types of licensing. International Licensing Industry Merchandisers’ Association. Retrieved August 7, 2009, fromhttp://www.licensing.org/education/licensing-types.php
McKeownJ. T. (2009, Spring). 2008 antitrust developments in professional sports: To the single entity and beyond. Marquette Sports Law Review, 19, 363–393.
19.
O'Bannon v. NCAA and Collegiate Licensing Company.
20.
PaolinoR. C. (2009, Spring). Upon further review: NFL How Network is violating the Sherman Act. Sports Lawyers Journal, 16, 1–46.