Abstract
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.adidas-America, Inc. v KMart Corp., No. CV-05-120-ST, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 70413 (D. Or., 2006 ).
2.adidas America, Inc. v. Payless Shoesource, Inc., 529 F. Supp. 2d 1215 (D. Or. 2007 ).
3.Avery Dennison Corp. v. Sumpton, 189 F.3d 868 (9th Cir. 1999 ).
4.
Beebe
B.
(2006 , Summer). Symposium: A defense of the new federal trademark antidilution law . Fordham Intell. Prop. Media & Ent. L.J. , 16 , 1143 –1174
5.Board of Regents, The University of Texas vs. Electric KST, Ltd, A-06-CA-950-LY, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8883 (W.D. Tex., February 5, 2008 ).
6.Trademark Dilution Revision Act H.R. Rep. No. 104-374 , p. 7 (1995 ).
7.Horphag Research Ltd. v. Garcia , 475 F.3d 1029 (9th Cir. 2007 ).
8.Federal Trademark Dilution Act, 15 U.S.C. §1125(c)(1), 1127 (2000 )).
9.Lanham Act (aka Federal Trademark Act of 1946), U.S.C. §1114 et seq .
10.Louis Vuitton Malletier S.A. v. Haute Diggitty Dog, LLC, 507 F.3d 252 (4th Cir. 2007 ).
11.Moseley v. Secret V. Catalogue, Inc., 537 U.S. 418, 123 S. Ct. 1115 (2003 ).
12.
Raymond
N.
(2008 , May 6). Kilpatrick scores $304 million verdict for adidas. Retrieved May 8, 2008 , from http://amlawdaily.typepad.com/amlawdaily/2008/05/kilpatrick-scor.html
13.Ringling Brothers-Barnum & Bailey Combined Shows, Inc. v. Utah Div. of Travel Development , 955 F. Supp. 605 (Va E.D. 1997), aff'd 170 F.3d 449 (4th Cir. 1999 ).
14.Thane International v. Trek Bicycle Corp., 305 F.3d 894 (9th Cir. 2002 ).
15.Trademark Dilution Revision Act of 2006, 15 U.S.C. §1125(c)(1) .