Cardtoons v. Major league Baseball Players Ass'n. , 95 F.3d 959 (10th Cir.1996).
2.
Comedy Productions III, Inc. v. Gary Saderup, Inc. , 21 P. 3d 797 (Cal.2001).
3.
th ETW Corp. v. Jireh Publishing, Inc. , 332 F. 3d 915 (6 Cir.2003).
4.
John Doe, a/k/a Tony Twist v. TCI Communications ., 110 S.W.3d 363 (2003).
5.
John Doe, a/k/a Tony Twist v. TCI Communications. (2002 Mo. App. LEXIS 1577).
6.
GradyJ., McKelveyS., & ClementA. (2005, March). A new “twist” in the evolving debate between the right of publicity and the First Amendment. Presentation at Sport and Recreation Law Association annual conference, Virginia Beach, VA.
7.
Halean Laboratories, Inc. v. Topps Chewing Gum, Inc. , 202 F.2d 866 (2d Cir.1953).
8.
HetzelD. (2004). Professional athletes and sports teams: The nexus of their identity protection,Sports Lawyers Journal, 11, 141–170.
9.
KruseM. (2004, Summer). Note: Missouri's interfacing of the First Amendment and the Right of Publicity: Is the “predominant purpose” test really that desirable?Missouri Law Review, 69, 799–816.
10.
LeeM. (2003). Agents of chaos: Judicial confusion in defining the right of publicity-free speech interface,Loyola L.A. Entertainment Law Review, 23, 471–501.
11.
McCarthyJ. T. (2003). McCarthy on Trademarks and Unfair Competition th (4 ed. 2003). Rights of Publicity, § 3.28.
12.
Recent case: First Amendment - Right of Publicity - Missouri Supreme Court creates “predominant purpose” test for First Amendment defens-es to publicity rights claims (2004, Feb), Harvard Law Review, 117, 1275–1282.
13.
Restatement (3d) of Unfair Competition, § 46.
14.
Restatement (3rd ) of Unfair Competition, § 47, cmt. c.
15.
Winter v. D.C. Comics, 69 P.3d 473 (Cal.2003).
16.
Zacchini v. Scripps Howard Broadcasting Co. , 433 U.S. 562 (1977).
