Young Black Men and Mental Health Care: An Intersectional Framework

Abstract

Mental health disparities among young Black men aged 18 to 25 have reached crisis levels in the United States, evidenced by a 47% increase in suicide rates between 2010 and 2020 and persistent underutilization of mental health services. Existing theoretical frameworks remain inadequate, as traditional approaches treat race, gender, and age as separate risk factors, failing to capture how multiple forms of marginalization intersect to create distinct patterns of risk and service disengagement. This conceptual review proposes a four-dimensional intersectional framework integrating gendered racism, masculinized health stigma, anti-Black misandry, and delayed adulthood, four mutually reinforcing forces operating synergistically during the critical period of emerging adulthood, offering clinicians, researchers, and policymakers a comprehensive model for understanding and addressing mental health disparities affecting young Black men.

Keywords

young Black men intersectionality gendered racism masculinized health stigma anti-Black misandry delayed adulthood emerging adulthood mental health disparities

Mental health disparities among young Black men (YBM) aged 18 to 25 represent one of the most pressing yet inadequately theorized public health crises in contemporary America. Between 2010 and 2020, Black men aged 18 to 25 experienced a 47% increase in suicide deaths, substantially exceeding increases among White (17%), American Indian or Alaska Native (20%), and Asian (34%) men of the same age cohort (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2025). This alarming trend occurs alongside critically low service utilization: 53% of Black men diagnosed with mood, anxiety, or substance use disorders never access professional mental health services (Woodward et al., 2011). These statistics reflect not merely individual suffering but systemic failures in how mental health research, policy, and practice understand and address the needs of young Black men.

Existing theoretical frameworks prove insufficient for explaining these disparities. Traditional approaches have treated race and gender as separate, additive factors—essentially summing independent effects rather than exploring their intersectional complexity (Bowleg, 2012). This compartmentalized analysis produces incomplete understanding. It suggests that young Black men experience racism (like all Black people) plus masculinity-related pressures (like all men), failing to recognize how these identities combine to create qualitatively distinct experiences. For instance, Black men face unique stereotypes of dangerousness and superhuman strength that do not apply to Black women or white men (Waytz et al., 2014), and these gendered and racialized perceptions profoundly shape their treatment within mental health systems (Kunstman et al., 2023). Moreover, much of the existing research on Black men fails to adopt a life course perspective (Collins-Anderson et al., 2022; Watkins et al., 2014), missing how critical developmental periods such as emerging adulthood distinctly influence their trajectories and well-being. This review addresses these gaps by proposing an intersectional framework integrating four critical dimensions: gendered racism, layered health stigma, anti-Black misandry, and delayed adulthood, which operate synergistically to create compounding barriers to mental health care access and utilization among young Black men.

Theoretical Foundation: An Intersectional Life Course Approach

Intersectionality as Analytical Framework

Intersectionality, as articulated by Kimberlé Crenshaw (1989) and developed within Black feminist scholarship (Bowleg, 2012), provides the foundational lens for this framework. Intersectionality posits that systems of oppression are not additive but interlocking. This means the experience of being both Black and male cannot be understood by simply combining separate analyses of race and gender. Rather, these identities interact to produce qualitatively distinct forms of marginalization and unique social positions. Philomena Essed’s (1991) concept of gendered racism exemplifies this principle: she demonstrated that for people of African descent, racism is always already gendered, shaping who is targeted, how they are stereotyped, and what consequences they face in everyday interactions.

For young Black men, this intersection produces particular vulnerabilities. They are simultaneously hypervisible as threats in public spaces yet invisible as individuals deserving care and support (Franklin & Boyd-Franklin, 2000). This paradox of being seen as dangerous while one’s suffering goes unseen cannot be explained through single-axis analyses of race or gender alone. Recent scholarship applies intersectionality to Black men’s health, documenting how gendered racism shapes experiences across contexts from policing to health care (Boyd et al., 2024; Loiseau & Mahalik, 2025). Our contribution builds on this foundation by identifying four dimensions that are particularly salient for mental health outcomes and service engagement among young Black men, explaining how these dimensions interact, and situating them within the developmental context of emerging adulthood.

Life Course Perspective and Emerging Adulthood

The life course perspective provides the temporal dimension to intersectionality’s structural analysis. While intersectionality clarifies what forms of marginalization young Black men face, the life course perspective explains when and how these forces accumulate to shape health trajectories. Life course theory emphasizes that health disparities result from cumulative exposure to risk factors across developmental stages, with early adversity creating cascading effects that amplify over time (Halfon & Forrest, 2017). For Black men, adverse childhood events begin shaping developmental trajectories early in life, creating pathways toward poor mental health outcomes long before adulthood (Umberson et al., 2014). Longitudinal research demonstrates that children exposed to early life social disadvantage exhibit significantly higher rates of mental health problems and risky health behaviors in adulthood (Assini-Meytin et al., 2021), establishing that the structural forces shaping young Black men’s mental health during emerging adulthood are not new but the culmination of developmental processes set in motion years earlier.

Within this broader developmental arc, emerging adulthood—ages 18 to 25—represents a uniquely critical period. Defined by identity exploration and transitions to adult roles (Arnett, 2000), this life stage is characterized by both heightened risk and developmental plasticity under normative conditions. For young Black men, that normative stress is compounded by the structural forces this framework addresses: it is when suicide disparities spike most dramatically, when failures to achieve stable employment and housing fully manifest, and when service utilization patterns are established that tend to persist across the life course (Adams et al., 2021; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2025; Gee & Verissimo, 2016). The convergence of developmental vulnerability and structural exclusion during this window makes emerging adulthood both the period of maximum risk and the period of maximum intervention opportunity for this population.

The Four-Dimensional Framework: Rationale and Structure

Building on intersectional and life course theories, we propose a four-dimensional framework comprising gendered racism, layered stigma, anti-Black misandry, and delayed adulthood (Figure 1). These dimensions were selected based on three criteria: empirical evidence linking each to mental health outcomes and service utilization among Black men, conceptual distinctiveness despite their interrelations, and actionability for intervention design. Each operates at a distinct level of analysis, with gendered racism at the structural/institutional level, layered health stigma at the sociocultural level, anti-Black misandry at the developmental level, and delayed adulthood at the material level, and while analytically distinct, they are mutually reinforcing, each shaping and amplifying the effects of the others. The sections below examine each dimension in detail before exploring their synergistic interactions.

Figure 1.

Intersectional framework YBM-MHC

Methodology

This article follows Hulland’s (2020) framework for conceptual reviews, which are distinguished from systematic reviews by purpose: rather than cataloguing empirical findings exhaustively, conceptual reviews use existing literature as raw material for constructing or extending theoretical understanding. The standard of rigor is therefore transparency about synthesizing logic and the future testability of the framework produced, not exhaustiveness of coverage.

Literature Selection

Relevant literature was identified through targeted searches in PubMed, PsycINFO, Web of Science, and Google Scholar, supplemented by backward and forward citation searches from key theoretical and empirical papers. Search terms were organized around five clusters: mental health disparities and service utilization among Black men, gendered racism in health care settings, mental health stigma in males, anti-Black misandry, and delayed adulthood. Priority was given to peer-reviewed empirical studies, systematic reviews, and theoretical contributions published in English. Studies were included when they documented a mechanism linking race, gender, or their intersection to mental health outcomes or service engagement; provided evidence bearing on one of the four framework dimensions; or documented intersectional disparities that single-axis analysis could not explain.

Conceptual Synthesis

Literature was assigned to framework dimensions as follows: institutional bias, clinical assessment disparities, and structural exclusion from health research to Gendered Racism; masculinity norms, stigma, collectivist values, and peer dynamics to Layered Health Stigma; socialization practices and adultification to Anti-Black Misandry; and labor market exclusion, incarceration, and material barriers to care to Delayed Adulthood. Studies spanning multiple dimensions were analyzed under the most central dimension and cross-referenced where relevant. An intersectional analytic lens was applied throughout, requiring that evidence be specifiable at the race-gender intersection rather than applicable to race or gender alone.

Dimension 1: Gendered Racism and Institutional Barriers

Gendered racism operates on Black men’s mental health through two mutually reinforcing stereotypes that, despite appearing opposite, produce the same clinical outcome: the dismissal of psychological suffering. Superhumanization attributes exceptional toughness, pain tolerance, and psychological resilience to Black men and boys, leading providers to perceive their distress as less severe and their need for treatment as less urgent even when presented with identical clinical profiles (Kunstman et al., 2023; Waytz et al., 2014). Dehumanization, rooted in centuries of anti-Black ideology and reproduced through contemporary media and institutional practice, encodes Black men as dangerous and animalistic, generating threat responses and emotional disengagement in providers that further foreclose empathic assessment (Brown, 2018; Hagiwara et al., 2017; Hester & Gray, 2018; Sun et al., 2022). What makes this paradox structurally powerful is precisely that the two distortions work in the same direction: whether a provider perceives a Black man as impressively stoic or implicitly threatening, the clinical response is diminished attention to his psychological pain. The three forms of invisibility that follow trace how this dynamic moves from the clinical encounter outward to institutions and ultimately to the data systems that determine where resources flow.

Three Forms of Invisibility

Psychological invisibility occurs when Black men’s emotional distress is rendered unremarkable at the point of clinical contact, a pattern that operates across three linked phases of the encounter. In the assessment phase, providers systematically underestimate the severity of Black men’s distress relative to equivalent presentations in white patients (Kunstman et al., 2023). Simultaneously, evaluations are rushed and patient-provider communication is of poorer quality, together producing a clinical encounter in which the full extent of psychological suffering is neither elicited nor recorded (Sim et al., 2021; Slatton et al., 2025). In the treatment phase, this attenuated reading translates into diagnostic and pharmacological choices that reflect reduced investment in care: misdiagnosis rates are higher, Black men are more likely to receive pharmacological treatments considered less effective or more burdensome by contemporary clinical standards, and referrals for follow-up testing arrive less often (Ellenbogen et al., 2024; Olbert et al., 2018; Wang et al., 2023). In the response phase, Black men absorb the cumulative message that their suffering is not clinically significant. Over repeated encounters, this produces a self-reinforcing pattern of symptom underreporting and help-seeking avoidance that reads as disengagement rather than as a rational adaptation to a system that has consistently failed to recognize their pain (Powell et al., 2016). Each phase compounds the next: attenuated assessment produces inadequate treatment, which confirms distrust, which drives the withdrawal that makes future assessment even less likely.

Institutional invisibility refers to the physical absence of Black men from health care settings, an absence that is not random but the predictable result of a cross-institutional pattern of harm that begins well before adulthood. From childhood onward, Black boys and young men encounter disproportionate disciplinary force across schools, child welfare agencies, policing, and the courts, each system adding to a cumulative architecture of distrust that is entirely rational given the evidence (Alang et al., 2020; Cénat et al., 2021; Tuchinda, 2023). When Black men do reach mental health care, that distrust is often confirmed rather than interrupted: providers are two and a half times more likely to document stigmatizing language such as “non-compliant” or “aggressive” in their charts, and Black men face substantially higher rates of involuntary psychiatric admission and physical restraint compared to white patients (Barnett et al., 2019; Shea et al., 2022; Sun et al., 2022). The rational response to this pattern is withdrawal: Black men who have experienced or witnessed surveillance, restraint, and coercive intervention in health care settings do not absent themselves out of indifference to their own wellbeing but out of a well-founded assessment that presenting for care carries risks that may exceed the risks of remaining untreated. As Black men withdraw from the health care system, institutional invisibility begins to generate demographic invisibility: their absence from care produces absence from the data, and absence from the data shapes the policies that govern care.

Demographic invisibility operates at the level of data infrastructure, where three mutually reinforcing mechanisms remove young Black men from the counts that determine policy priorities and resource allocation. The first is survivorship bias: population-based needs assessments and resource allocation models are built from counts of living residents, meaning that individuals who die before or between survey cycles are systematically excluded from the data used to estimate community need, and the communities that lose the most members to premature death receive the least accurate accounting of the burden they carry (Czeisler et al., 2021). Because young Black men disproportionately experience homicide their deaths do not simply reduce population counts but remove the highest-need individuals from the data precisely when and where the need is greatest, ensuring that the communities bearing the heaviest burden of premature mortality are systematically underrepresented in the planning processes designed to serve them (Jones-Eversley et al., 2020).The second is carceral displacement: Census practices count incarcerated individuals as residents of prison facilities rather than their home communities, transferring political representation and potentially associated service funding from urban Black communities to the predominantly White, rural districts where prisons are located, a practice scholars refer to as prison gerrymandering (Ebenstein, 2018; Kajstura, 2024). The third is data fragmentation: because Black men are systematically underrepresented in clinical settings, their health records are sparse and insufficient to power the predictive models that drive health care planning, reproducing the exact disparities those models are designed to detect (Getzen et al., 2023; Shavers-Hornaday et al., 1997; Zuniga et al., 2020). Across all three mechanisms, systems measure what they can see, and what they can see is shaped by the exclusions they are supposed to correct. Crucially, demographic invisibility does not merely reflect the other two forms; it actively reinforces them. When young Black men are absent from the research literature, provider training proceeds without accurate knowledge of their presentations. When they are undercounted in policy data, outreach programs are not designed to reach them. The clinical biases that produce psychological invisibility are thus ratified and reproduced at the institutional level, closing a loop that runs from the provider encounter to the policy environment and back again.

Dimension 2: Layered Health Stigma and Sociocultural Barriers

While gendered racism creates institutional barriers from outside, layered stigma operates from within, shaping whether and how young Black men allow themselves to recognize distress, disclose it to others, and pursue professional care. What makes this dimension analytically distinct is not simply the presence of stigma but its structural multiplicity. Scholars have documented a double stigma experienced by racial minorities with mental illness, in which the stigma of mental illness compounds pre-existing racial discrimination to produce barriers that exceed what either alone would generate (Alvidrez et al., 2008; Corrigan & Miller, 2004). For young Black men, however, the double stigma framework does not fully capture the configuration of stigma processes at work: it does not account for masculine norm stigma, which operates upstream of racial and mental illness stigma by suppressing private acknowledgment of distress before any social decision point is reached. Drawing on Link and Phelan’s (2001) conceptualization of stigma as a social process and Corrigan and Watson’s (2002) distinction between public and self-stigma, three processes can be identified that operate simultaneously on different targets. Self-stigma, the internalization of cultural scripts about Black masculinity, forecloses private acknowledgment of distress before disclosure is even considered. Public and reputational stigma, enforced through peer judgment and community expectations, penalizes any visible departure from masculine performance. Courtesy stigma, the anticipated damage to family or community reputation that accompanies a member’s mental health disclosure, penalizes the act of sharing even outside formal help-seeking contexts (Corrigan & Miller, 2004). These processes do not accumulate in a linear, additive fashion but interlock across successive decision points on the pathway from private distress to professional care. A young Black man who overcomes masculine norm pressure enough to acknowledge his distress privately still faces public stigma if he considers formal treatment, and courtesy stigma if he considers disclosure to family. Each layer forecloses an exit that the previous layer might have left open.

Self-Stigma and Masculine Norms

Masculinized health stigma, as conceptualized by VanHook (2025), emerges from the cultural equation of psychological vulnerability with weakness, a social norm that renders mental health acknowledgment incompatible with dominant masculine identity. Among young Black men, conformity to these norms is associated with increased depressive symptoms and help-seeking avoidance, with the pressure intensifying for those who rely on reputation-based masculinity as a substitute for blocked economic achievement, where the perceived gap between masculine ideals and lived reality paradoxically worsens mental health while foreclosing the pathways through which it might be addressed (Curtis et al., 2021; Goodwill et al., 2020; Hammond, 2012; Stanaland et al., 2023). Strong adherence to masculine ideals suppresses help-seeking, promotes maladaptive coping through substance use or aggression, and transforms manageable distress into crisis-level presentations that produce emergency interventions rather than early, preventive care (McCreary et al., 2020; Parcesepe & Cabassa, 2013; Seidler et al., 2016). Within the framework’s layered structure, self-stigma is foundational because it operates at the earliest decision point, the private acknowledgment of distress, before public or courtesy stigma become relevant. Masculinized health stigma typically moderates as men gain stable employment, partnership, and community standing, but for young Black men systematically excluded from these transitions, that natural moderating process is disrupted, making the 18 to 25 window one in which external intervention is theoretically necessary rather than optional (Courtenay, 2000). Without that intervention, the self-stigma established in this period hardens into the baseline from which every subsequent help-seeking decision is made.

Public and Reputational Stigma

Where self-stigma operates internally, public and reputational stigma operate through social enforcement. The concept of cool pose, an emotionally guarded, stylized performance of masculinity signaling emotional control and toughness through body language, tone, and demeanor, functions as a communicative practice within Black male peer networks that both reflects and reinforces this enforcement (Majors & Billson, 1992). What distinguishes reputational stigma from self-stigma is that its operative mechanism is anticipation rather than internalization: the anxiety about potential loss of status shapes behavior even when rejection never materializes, functioning as rejection sensitivity in homosocial relationships during late adolescence and emerging adulthood and causing young men to preemptively conceal vulnerability to avoid imagined social consequences (Jackson, 2018; London et al., 2007). Failure to embody expected markers of toughness exposes young Black men to social sanction, diminished status, or exclusion from peer groups, consequences whose anticipation is sufficient to suppress disclosure regardless of whether they occur (Curtis et al., 2021; O'Dea et al., 2017). While cool pose may temporarily shield individuals from perceived reputational harm, it ultimately deepens the silence around psychological struggle and forecloses the peer-level disclosure that might otherwise serve as a first and accessible pathway to care.

Courtesy Stigma and Relational Barriers

Beyond individual and peer-level enforcement, courtesy stigma operates at the family and community level, penalizing mental health disclosure through its anticipated consequences for those associated with the person seeking help. Within many Black families and communities, identity is fundamentally relational, and mental health disclosure carries implications that extend beyond the individual to the family’s collective reputation. In cultural contexts where mental illness is already stigmatized, collectivist values predict greater mental health stigma, while young men may internalize the belief that acknowledging mental health problems constitutes disloyalty, potentially exposing loved ones to scrutiny or suggesting familial inadequacy (Muralidharan et al., 2014; Papadopoulos et al., 2012). frameworks further complicate this dynamic: in highly religious environments, psychological distress may be interpreted as a display of insufficient faith, with pastoral guidance preferred over professional intervention, inadvertently delaying evidence-based treatment by positioning help-seeking as spiritual failure (Lukachko et al., 2015). For Black queer men in conservative religious households, this dynamic carries an additional layer, as sexual identity and psychological distress are both interpreted through a lens of spiritual deficiency, meaning that when seeking care for either concern risks spiritual condemnation, family rejection, and loss of community standing, both pathways to help are foreclosed by the same social context (Sun et al., 2018). Intergenerational transmission within Black families adds a final layer: older family members, particularly older males, transmit an ethos of endurance rooted in lived experience, urging younger men to persevere based on their own survival of subjectively worse conditions, which while reflecting genuine resilience can inadvertently position contemporary struggles as unworthy of professional attention (Black & Rubinstein, 2009). Critically, the multiplicative character of layered stigma becomes most visible when additional marginalized identities intersect with the baseline structure: Black men who have survived childhood sexual abuse face a convergence of self-stigma, public stigma, and courtesy stigma (i.e., fragmentation in family due to outing of abuser) that does not simply intensify each layer but forecloses the disclosure pathways that any single layer might have left available (Widanaralalage et al., 2024). The intersecting configuration of stigma young Black men experience is precisely what a single-axis stigma framework cannot detect, and what the layered structure of this dimension is designed to make visible.

Dimension 3: Anti-Black Misandry and Developmental Consequences

Anti-Black misandry represents a distinct dimension that operates at the developmental level, shaping psychological trajectories from early childhood through emerging adulthood and beyond. While the term may initially appear to overlap with gendered racism, these dimensions are conceptually and practically distinct. Gendered racism describes institutional oppression enacted by external systems (e.g., schools, police, health care) that target Black men through intersecting racial and gender stereotypes. Anti-Black misandry describes intrapersonal biases, attitudes, and socialization practices within Black families and communities. While often rooted in protective intentions against a racist society, these practices create developmental environments that deny Black boys’ emotional vulnerability, impose premature expectations for self-sufficiency, and systematically devalue their psychological needs.

Theoretical Framework: Symbolic Interactionism

Understanding how anti-Black misandry develops requires examining the micro-level processes through which attitudes are transmitted. Symbolic interactionism provides the theoretical foundation for understanding gendered attitudes by illuminating how social meanings and identities are constructed through everyday interactions (Serpe & Stryker, 2011). This perspective reveals how routine exchanges, language use, enforcement of informal rules, assignment of household roles, enact and reinforce stereotypes about boys and men. Crucially, these dynamics are not simply reactive responses to external racism. Rather, they are actively produced through interactions within communities, shaped by the constant pressure of navigating a hostile racial environment.

Anti-Black misandry manifests through what Brooms (2025) describes as collective social scripts that construct Black males as inherently suspicious, marginal, or requiring exceptional toughness. These cues are rarely explicit. They often emerge through offhand comments, differential discipline compared to sisters, lowered expectations for emotional expression, or praise for stoic toughness. Such implicit messages are woven into the everyday life of Black boys, shaping their self-concept and emotional regulation from early childhood to adulthood (Dunbar et al., 2021). According to Brooms (2025), misandrist microaggressions undermine healthy identity development, foster internalized beliefs about one’s limited worth, and create lasting impacts on mental health. Early internalized messages become the psychological foundation upon which all later help-seeking decisions are built.

Developmental Manifestations Across the Life Course

Anti-Black misandry operates across the full developmental trajectory, beginning in early childhood and intensifying through adolescence. Research documents that Black boys receive harsher physical discipline than Black girls, with punishment that is more frequent, more severe, and more likely to escalate into abuse (Scott & Pinderhughes, 2019). From young ages, Black boys are socialized to suppress emotional pain, taught that vulnerability is weakness, and told they must be tough to survive in a racist society (; Dennis & Zolnikov, 2023; Hines et al., 2021; Laing et al., 2025). While caregivers often intend this strictness as protection, preparing boys for the real dangers they will face, such practices create unintended consequences, including difficulty recognizing personal distress, reluctance to express psychological struggles, and decreased likelihood of seeking professional help.

Three intersecting developmental processes are associated with anti-Black misandry: adultification, masculinization, and hypersexualization. Adultification imposes premature expectations for maturity and self-reliance. Black boys are expected to care for themselves, protect themselves and others (sometimes with aggression), contribute financially to families, and endure adversity silently (Hooper et al., 2014; Roy et al., 2014). These premature expectations rob Black boys of childhood itself, fast-forwarding them into adult responsibilities without the developmental scaffolding necessary for psychological health. Masculinization enforces rigid norms of strength, stoicism, and emotional suppression, with both family dynamics and broader societal cues reinforcing the expectation that Black boys must always exemplify toughness and self-sufficiency (Frederick et al., 2022). This relentless enforcement of emotional rigidity leaves little room for the vulnerability necessary for healthy psychological development. Simultaneously, hypersexualization denies Black boys childhood innocence, casting them as masculine and sexual from early ages. Early sexual experience is valorized rather than recognized as potentially harmful (Curry & Utley, 2018). The convergence of harsh discipline, adultification, masculinization, and hypersexualization creates developmental contexts where emotional vulnerability is systematically denied and psychological distress goes unrecognized. Such experiences accumulate across childhood and adolescence, producing lasting impacts on self-concept, emotional regulation, and attitudes toward help-seeking.

Clinical Manifestations and Misrecognition

The developmental impacts of anti-Black misandry manifest clinically in ways that are frequently misunderstood and mishandled. Externalizing behaviors such as aggression, defiance, disruptive conduct, and hypersexuality are often the most visible mental health challenges among Black boys, yet these behaviors are typically interpreted as discipline problems rather than as signs of underlying distress (Johnson, 2024). When distress does emerge, expressions of vulnerability are discouraged, leading to systematic underdiagnosis and unmet needs. This misrecognition is compounded by structural responses. Rather than receiving mental health support, Black boys experiencing distress face disproportionate punishment. This includes harsher school discipline including suspension and expulsion (Bryan et al., 2024; Gershoff & Font, 2016) and elevated rates of juvenile incarceration (McNair et al., 2019). This pathway from misrecognized distress to punitive response establishes patterns of system distrust that persist throughout the life course. The psychological difficulties that characterize early adulthood among young Black men are thus not sudden in onset but developmentally accumulated, traceable to the misandrist socialization that taught them to suppress distress and the institutional responses that punished them for expressing it.

The Psychoeschatological Dilemma

The developmental trajectory anti-Black misandry produces does not end with unmet need; it ends, for too many young Black men, in death. Black Male Studies scholar Tommy Curry terms this ultimate convergence the psychoeschatological dilemma: the condition in which public and academic attention focuses on Black male mortality while systematically ignoring the psychological distress that precedes and produces it (Curry, 2017). What the psychoeschatological dilemma also names is misrecognition within the family system, where the cultural forces that taught young Black men to conceal their suffering also prevented the people who loved them from seeing it until it was too late to intervene. The dilemma is empirically visible in the United States, where young Black men face both an endemic of homicide and a rapidly accelerating epidemic of suicide, with rates among Black males aged 15 to 24 rising significantly between 2010 and 2020 (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2025). Interrupting this trajectory requires not only institutional reform but a deliberate investment in family-level mental health literacy, equipping caregivers with the knowledge to recognize the signs of psychological vulnerability in Black boys before those signs are misread as behavioral problems, disciplinary failures, or simple toughness.

Distinguishing Intention From Impact

Many Black caregivers use strict, emotionally restrained parenting to protect their sons from the dangers of a racist society, helping boys become tough enough to withstand discrimination, cautious enough to avoid police violence, and self-sufficient enough to overcome systemic barriers. Yet even when intentions are protective, the impact can be harmful: the same practices meant to build resilience can traumatize, stunt emotional growth, and foreclose the help-seeking behaviors that psychological health requires, creating a cycle in which Black boys are taught to be tough because the world is harsh, and the world then treats them harshly because they appear tough. This cycle, however, is not deterministic. Families who successfully protect sons from racial harm while preserving their emotional development tend to draw on cultural socialization practices that affirm Black children’s cultural identity and full humanity alongside, rather than instead of, preparation for racial threat (Hughes et al., 2006). This distinction marks the boundary between anti-Black misandry and its alternative: the framework describes one configuration of parenting under racial stress, not Black family socialization as a category, and the families who successfully resist these patterns represent a form of promotive, strengths-based parenting that future scholarship should examine with equal rigor.

Dimension 4: Delayed Adulthood and Material Barriers

Delayed transition to adulthood represents the material and structural dimension of our framework, encompassing how systemic barriers prevent young Black men from achieving stable employment, educational advancement, and economic security during the critical period of emerging adulthood. This dimension explains both resource-based barriers to mental health care (i.e., lack of insurance, inability to afford services, unstable housing) and psychological consequences (i.e., weakened future orientation, fatalism, identity disruption) that compound other dimensions’ effects.

Labor Market Exclusion and Economic Marginalization

The material dimension begins with a pattern of employment disconnection that is not simply racial but produced at the intersection of race and gender in ways that existing single-axis frameworks cannot explain. Drawing on 2022 Current Population Survey data, the Not in Employment, Education, or Training rate for young Black men stands at 13.8% in the late teen years, rises to 20.5% between ages 20 and 24, and remains at approximately 21% through ages 25 to 29 (Fremstad et al., 2023). The intersectional character of this trajectory becomes clear in comparison to young white men, whose NEET rate follows the opposite arc: 11.6% in the late teen years, a modest rise to 13.4% at ages 20 to 24, then a decline to 11% by ages 25 to 29 (Fremstad et al., 2023). The gap between the two groups therefore widens precisely during the period when most men are achieving labor market footholds, from 2.2 percentage points in the late teen years to 7.1 points at ages 20 to 24 and 10 points by ages 25 to 29. Many young Black men who are technically employed are concentrated in precarious work, including gig economy jobs, temporary positions, and part-time work with unpredictable schedules, that lack stability, benefits, or advancement opportunities (Bureau of Labor Statistics, 2024). This diverging trajectory is not explained by educational attainment or occupational differences alone. Research by Lu and Leicht (2025) demonstrates that Black men are substantially more likely than White men to be concentrated in precarious, low-wage hourly employment, and that about half of this racial disparity cannot be explained by differences in education or occupation, pointing unmistakably to discrimination rather than deficits in qualifications or effort. What drives the gap is the intersection of racial discrimination and gendered labor market structures in which stable employment signals adult manhood — transforming economic exclusion into both a material and a developmental injury.

Mass incarceration is a primary mechanism driving the sustained elevation of young Black men’s NEET rate in their twenties, precisely when other groups are consolidating labor market participation. One in five Black men will experience incarceration by age 30, compared to approximately one in seventeen White men, a disparity whose scale reflects the specific targeting of Black male bodies by carceral systems operating at the intersection of race and gender (Ghandnoosh, 2023). Each period of incarceration removes a young Black man from the labor force entirely, and the consequences extend far beyond the period of confinement itself. This incarceration causes massive disruption to educational attainment and labor market participation that persists across the life course (Zhavoronkova et al., 2023). The intersection of criminal justice involvement and educational disadvantage is particularly pronounced: among unemployed Black men, those with arrest histories are more than twice as likely to lack high school completion (50%) compared to those without arrest records (24%) (Bushway et al., 2022). Black adolescent males who experience juvenile arrests face significant educational disruptions that decrease their likelihood of completing high school and transitioning to postsecondary education (Kirk & Sampson, 2012). Juvenile arrests disrupt education, and adult incarceration creates criminal records that further foreclose employment, generating feedback loops that compound the NEET trajectory documented above. Each arrest thus becomes not a discrete event but an inflection point that alters entire life trajectories, and the cumulative effect is a population systematically removed from the economy at precisely the age when labor market attachment would otherwise be deepening.

Mental Health Consequences of Delayed Adulthood

Multiple mechanisms explain the association between delayed adulthood and elevated mental health risks. Financial insecurity from unstable employment and limited educational attainment directly produces anxiety and depression (Guan et al., 2022). Persistent setbacks in achieving normative adult milestones (i.e., stable employment, romantic partnership, independent housing) undermine identity and self-worth, particularly in a society that equates masculine achievement with economic provision and social status. Social exclusion compounds psychological distress. As peers and family members transition to stable adult roles, individuals experiencing prolonged delays often feel isolated, stigmatized, and ashamed (Clark, 2012). The accumulation of chronic stressors erodes psychological resilience, increasing vulnerability to substance use, suicidal ideation, and disengagement from support systems (Gariépy et al., 2021). This relationship is bidirectional: while delayed adulthood increases risk for mental health problems, preexisting psychological distress can also impede successful transitions, creating vicious cycles of disadvantage.

Future Orientation and Developmental Consequences

Perhaps the most consequential psychological impact of delayed adulthood is erosion of future orientation. Future orientation develops through repeated experiences of setting goals, working toward them, and receiving positive reinforcement from achievement (Johnson et al., 2014). When education does not lead to employment, when employment does not provide stability, when planning feels futile because circumstances are beyond one’s control, future orientation weakens. Research identifies future orientation as a critical developmental asset. Individuals with strong future orientation exhibit better academic achievement (Pawlak & Moustafa, 2023), health behaviors (Capps & Updegraff, 2023), employability confidence (Shen et al., 2024), attainment of young adult milestones (Oshri et al., 2018), and lower rates of psychological distress (Skinner et al., 2022) as well as lower rates of substance use and delinquency (Marotta & Voisin, 2017). Young men generally exhibit lower future orientation and higher rates of fatalism than women (Jamieson & Romer, 2008; Mello & Worrell, 2006). This gendered pattern suggests that interventions strengthening future orientation may be particularly crucial for young men navigating emerging adulthood. The combination of internalized discouragement and structural exclusion creates self-reinforcing cycles. As setbacks accumulate and opportunities diminish, young men may disengage from education, employment, and health care, further perpetuating exclusion. The psychological toll of delayed adulthood thus extends beyond immediate distress to fundamentally alter how young Black men envision and approach their futures.

Barriers to Mental Health Service Engagement

Delayed adulthood creates direct barriers to mental health service access and retention. In the United States, health insurance and benefits are predominantly tied to employment or educational enrollment. Disconnection from adult roles is associated with lower rates of insurance coverage, delayed care initiation, and greater reliance on emergency services during acute crises rather than preventive or ongoing care (Carlson et al., 2021; Pharr et al., 2011). This reactive pattern perpetuates cycles where mental health problems worsen untreated until they require emergency intervention, further reinforcing system strain and poor outcomes. Retention in mental health treatment is significantly lower among unemployed and underemployed individuals as unstable work schedules, transportation barriers, housing instability, and competing survival priorities make consistent treatment participation difficult (Maraj et al., 2019). The competing demands and constraints mean that even when young Black men successfully access initial services, maintaining engagement becomes nearly impossible without addressing material circumstances. The cumulative effect is that young Black men experiencing mental health crises often lack insurance coverage, cannot afford care, and face logistical barriers to accessing services. Delayed adulthood thus operates as both a direct barrier to care (through insurance and resource limitations) and an indirect barrier (through psychological impacts that reduce help-seeking motivation and treatment engagement). Addressing mental health disparities among young Black men requires confronting the material barriers that prevent successful transitions to adulthood, not merely providing mental health services to individuals already experiencing crises.

Discussion

The four-dimensional intersectional framework proposed here advances understanding of mental health disparities among young Black men in three ways, each corresponding to a structural element of Figure 1. It provides theoretical clarity about four analytically distinct dimensions of marginalization, each operating through its own mechanisms at its own level of analysis: gendered racism at the structural/institutional level, layered health stigma at the sociocultural level, anti-Black misandry at the developmental level, and delayed adulthood at the material level. It explains why existing single-axis interventions consistently fall short: the bidirectional arrows in Figure 1 represent documented feedback loops in which each dimension amplifies the others, making any approach that targets a single dimension while leaving the others unaddressed insufficient by design. And it situates these intersecting forces within the critical developmental period of emerging adulthood, the convergence point at the center of Figure 1, identifying both why disparities intensify during this life stage and where intervention may be most impactful before the barriers each dimension produces harden into self-reinforcing cycles.

Anti-Black misandry establishes the developmental foundation upon which the other three dimensions build: from childhood, Black boys are socialized to suppress emotion and demonstrate toughness, creating psychological architecture that forecloses acknowledgment of distress before institutional or material barriers become relevant. Gendered racism then operates across every institutional encounter, ensuring that when young Black men do present for care, their distress is systematically underestimated and their suffering rendered invisible by the same providers positioned to help them. Layered stigma forecloses the internal and social pathways through which distress might otherwise be recognized and disclosed, while delayed adulthood removes the material conditions supporting help-seeking: without stable employment, insurance, or the role transitions that moderate masculine norm rigidity, young Black men lack both the practical means and the identity resources that recovery requires. The result is not simply elevated risk but a systematic erosion of the conditions under which help-seeking becomes conceivable. Incarceration, suicide and homicide among this age group are better understood not as isolated tragedies but as the most visible endpoints of a developmental trajectory shaped by forces operative long before the young man standing at that threshold was old enough to name them.

Clinical Implications

School-based mental health services and pediatric primary care represent critical vectors for prevention and early intervention, offering structured points of contact before the structural dynamics this framework describes reach their most destructive convergence during emerging adulthood. For many Black youth, these settings represent the only continuous, affordable source of care and the primary site for facilitating the transition to adult services at age eighteen, a transition consistently overlooked by both school systems and community providers (Bowen et al., 2025; Calabrese et al., 2022). Culturally responsive, comprehensive transition planning is essential, and established models provide frameworks for this work (GOT Transition, 2025; Schwartz et al., 2013). Psychoeducation programming should engage Black boys and young men through curricula and mentorship that foster emotional literacy and positive self-concept, equipping youth to recognize and cope with stereotypes and discrimination while strengthening family racial socialization practices that affirm emotional vulnerability alongside racial pride (Anderson et al., 2020; Hughes et al., 2006). When delivered consistently and with cultural intentionality, these early interventions build the emotional and relational infrastructure that makes later help-seeking not only possible but conceivable.

Effective clinical intervention requires simultaneous investment at the provider, family, and community levels. Provider training must be intersectional and gender-sensitive, equipping clinicians to recognize implicit bias, center trust-building and cultural humility, and create environments responsive to the discrimination documented in this framework (Godsil & McGill Johnson, 2013). Family-focused programming should sustain engagement through the transition to adult care while supporting caregivers in modeling emotional openness alongside racial affirmation (Lippold et al., 2024; Thomas et al., 2020). At the community level, because reputation-based masculinity is enforced through anticipated peer judgment rather than held as a private belief, reshaping what counts as masculine within existing social networks is as important as changing individual attitudes. Gender-transformative group approaches, peer role model programs, and outreach through trusted community spaces create the permission structures that make sustained behavior change possible, with the shared goal of ensuring that young Black men can recognize their distress, access systems designed to address it, and understand help-seeking as an act of self-determination rather than a concession to weakness (Chatmon, 2020; Coleman-Kirumba et al., 2023; Powell et al., 2016). Across all three levels, the animating goal is the same: to dismantle the interlocking barriers this framework identifies and replace them with conditions under which young Black men can seek and sustain care without cost to their identity or dignity.

Research Implications

The four-dimensional framework points toward distinct research priorities across each of its dimensions. Gendered racism work should test provider-level bias interventions and examine how superhumanization and dehumanization operate in clinical encounters. Anti-Black misandry requires longitudinal designs tracing how childhood socialization shapes adult mental health trajectories alongside positive deviance research identifying families who prepare sons for racism without requiring emotional suppression. Layered stigma research should develop and validate multidimensional instruments that assess masculine norms, collectivist values, religious frameworks, and peer-based stigma simultaneously, and test whether interventions must address each layer concurrently or whether targeting specific combinations produces equivalent outcomes. Delayed adulthood research should prioritize understanding how labor market exclusion, criminal justice involvement, and the failure to achieve normative adult role transitions produce and sustain mental health risk among young Black men. Measurement work is a foundational need: existing research relies too heavily on single indicators like NEET status when the lived experience of precarious adulthood is multidimensional, encompassing employment instability, educational disconnection, and the absence of role transitions that anchor adult identity; the Urban Institute’s Upward Mobility Predictor Assessment represents a promising step toward the composite measurement this dimension requires (Solari et al., 2025). Research should also examine how the erosion of future orientation, the capacity to envision and pursue meaningful long-term goals, under conditions of repeated blocked achievement contributes to depression, fatalism, and suicidality, a pathway for which empirical support already exists and that intervention research must now be designed to interrupt (Kirtley et al., 2022). The bidirectional relationship between structural exclusion and psychological distress, in which material deprivation elevates mental health risk while psychological distress further impedes successful adult transitions, creates self-reinforcing cycles that require intervention at multiple points simultaneously rather than at a single-entry point (Gariépy et al., 2021). Critically, intervention research must test adolescent-focused programs that scaffold the skills, credentials, and social supports necessary for successful adulthood transitions before exclusion fully materializes. Without research that traces these pathways from adolescence forward, interventions will continue to arrive after the conditions they are designed to address have already hardened into place.

Capturing the framework’s synergistic interactions requires methodological infrastructure that no single dimension-specific study can provide. Multilevel mixed-methods designs, cohort-sequential approaches for identifying critical developmental windows, and validated measurement tools for intersectional discrimination, multidimensional stigma, anti-Black misandry, and future orientation, each developed through psychometric validation and cognitive interviewing with young Black men, are foundational prerequisites for testing how dimensions compound rather than simply accumulate. Intervention research must build on this infrastructure by testing multi-level approaches that address framework dimensions simultaneously, prioritizing culturally adapted therapies, family-based programs fostering emotional intelligence alongside racial preparation, and peer-based interventions that leverage social networks to reduce stigma and facilitate help-seeking. Comparative effectiveness designs should determine which components are necessary versus sufficient and identify optimal sequencing strategies, while implementation science must address reach and sustainability beyond initial funding cycles. Together, these priorities lay the groundwork for an evidence base capable of translating the framework’s intersectional logic into the interventions this population urgently needs.

Policy Implications

Addressing mental health disparities among young Black men requires reform across mental health systems and the educational institutions that precede them. Mandatory intersectional bias training is foundational to dismantling the clinical encounter failures this framework documents; Perception Institute research demonstrates that implicit bias, racial anxiety, and stereotype threat operate as distinct but reinforcing mechanisms in health care encounters, and that bias disruption training produces meaningful change when embedded in organizational systems rather than delivered as a standalone event (Godsil & McGill Johnson, 2013). Expanding the recruitment and retention of Black male clinicians addresses both a representation crisis and a care access failure: Black men currently comprise just 3% of psychologists, 8% of Black graduate-level social workers, and 5.1% of counselor education enrollees, a gap that limits access to culturally concordant care and perpetuates the institutional invisibility this framework identifies as a core barrier to help-seeking among young Black men (Mallory et al., 2025). Broadening insurance coverage to include barbershops, recreation centers, and faith institutions extends care into spaces where Black men already congregate; a systematic scoping review found that gender- and race-aligned strategies in these settings overcome the recruitment and engagement failures that have long characterized conventional outreach to this population (Wippold et al., 2024). Medicaid expansion in non-adopting states addresses coverage disparities through one of the most evidence-based levers available, with research linking expansion to improved mental health outcomes and reduced racial disparities in coverage (Lee et al., 2021). In schools, vocational training and registered apprenticeship pathways provide labor market footholds before employment discrimination fully materializes, with documented earnings gains and no student debt burden for participants (Camardelle, 2023). Mental health literacy curricula delivered in school settings improve knowledge and reduce stigma over time, equipping young Black men with the conceptual vocabulary that stigma-focused socialization has denied them (Gere & Salimi, 2025), while emotional literacy curricula counteract the emotional suppression this framework identifies as foundational to help-seeking avoidance (Bozkurt & Küçük Alemdar, 2025). Sustaining these investments requires parallel structural reform addressing the labor market exclusion and carceral dynamics that produce the conditions this framework documents, including workforce development with integrated mental health support, living wage policies, record expungement, and criminal justice reforms that reduce disciplinary disparities and expand diversion. Across all of these investments, the common logic holds: intervene before disconnection occurs, build trust before it is needed, and create conditions under which help-seeking becomes a viable and culturally coherent choice.

Limitations

This framework synthesizes existing literature rather than presenting new empirical data, and research testing its predictions is needed. The focus on young Black men risks essentializing this population, though the framework describes general patterns rather than universal conditions, and the emphasis on barriers reflects a deliberate analytical choice rather than a claim that Black families and communities lack protective resources. The racial socialization literature documents robust promotive practices that support resilience in Black youth without the suppression costs this framework analyzes, and future work should examine how these protective configurations interact with the barrier dimensions identified here (Anderson et al., 2020; Hughes et al., 2006). The framework also focuses on emerging adulthood without fully addressing how dimensions operate in earlier childhood or later adulthood, and Figure 1 necessarily simplifies by depicting the four dimensions as simultaneous and equally weighted, when the reviewed evidence establishes that they differ in developmental onset, asymmetry of mutual influence, and degree of within-group variability. Future empirical work should aim to produce a more differentiated, empirically specified version of the model through longitudinal, intersectional, and multi-level designs capable of detecting the compounding and staged effects the framework proposes.

Conclusion

The framework proposed here advances understanding of mental health disparities among young Black men in ways that existing single-axis and double-stigma models cannot, by specifying not only the forces at work but the mechanisms through which they operate, the levels at which they function, and the developmental logic that explains why their consequences intensify precisely when young Black men can least afford them. The four dimensions are qualitatively different forces rather than parallel barriers of equivalent type, anti-Black misandry functions as the foundational layer that shapes how the other three are experienced, and their convergence during emerging adulthood is structurally produced rather than coincidental. What this framework offers, beyond theoretical precision, is a common language for the researchers, clinicians, policymakers, and community members who must work together if the conditions shaping young Black men’s mental health are to change; a language capable of holding the complexity of their experiences without reducing it, and of generating the kind of sustained, serious, intersectional dialogue this population has long deserved and rarely received.

Footnotes

ORCID iD

Cortney VanHook

Funding

The authors received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Declaration of Conflicting Interests

The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Author Biographies

Cortney VanHook is an assistant professor of social work at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. His work focuses on the mental health of young Black males, gun violence prevention and intervention, and mental health care utilization pathways.

Samuel Kumi is a doctoral student in education at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. His research focuses on the mental health experiences of Black male international students from Africa in U.S. higher education and how institutional policies shape their help-seeking behaviors.

Jamarkus Guest is a doctoral student in social work at the University of Connecticut. His research focuses on Black youth leveraging their social capital to navigate systemic racism, achieve cultural influence, foster personal growth, and combat stigma.

References

Adams

Hahn

Coffey

(2021). Stabilizing young people transitioning to adulthood: Opportunities and challenges with key safety net programs. The Urban Institute. https://www.urban.org/research/publication/stabilizing-young-people-transitioning-adulthood

Alang

McAlpine

D. D.

Hardeman

(2020). Police brutality and mistrust in medical institutions. Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities, 7(4), 760–768. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40615-020-00706-w

Alvidrez

Snowden

L. R.

Kaiser

D. M.

(2008). The experience of stigma among Black mental health consumers. Journal of Health Care for the Poor and Underserved, 19(3), 874–893. https://doi.org/10.1353/hpu.0.0058

Anderson

R. E.

Metzger

Applewhite

Sawyer

Jackson

Flores

Majors

McKenny

M. C.

Carter

(2020). Hands up, now what? Black families’ reactions to racial socialization interventions. Journal of Youth Development, 15(5), 93–109. https://doi.org/10.5195/jyd.2020.755

Arnett

J. J.

(2000). Emerging adulthood: A theory of development from the late teens through the twenties. American Psychologist, 55(5), 469–480. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.5.469

Assini-Meytin

L. C.

Fix

R. L.

Green

K. M.

Nair

Letourneau

E. J.

(2021). Adverse childhood experiences, mental health, and risk behaviors in adulthood: Exploring sex, racial, and ethnic group differences in a nationally representative sample. Journal of Child & Adolescent Trauma, 15(3), 833–845. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40653-021-00424-3

Barnett

Mackay

Matthews

Gate

Greenwood

Ariyo

Bhui

Halvorsrud

Pilling

Smith

(2019). Ethnic variations in compulsory detention under the Mental Health Act: A systematic review and meta-analysis of international data. The Lancet Psychiatry, 6(4), 305–317. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2215-0366(19)30027-6

Black

H. K.

Rubinstein

R. L.

(2009). The effect of suffering on generativity: Accounts of elderly African American men. Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 64(2), 296–303. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbn012

Bowen

A. E.

Garbacz

S. A.

Anderson

E. C.

Wadington

Eklund

(2025). The promise of school-based health centers to enhance youth mental health equity. Journal of School Health, 95(7), 566–570. https://doi.org/10.1111/josh.70024

10.

Bowleg

(2012). The problem with the phrase women and minorities: Intersectionality—an important theoretical framework for public health. American Journal of Public Health, 102(7), 1267–1273. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2012.300750

11.

Boyd

D. T.

Quinn

C. R.

Durkee

M. I.

Williams

E.-D. G.

Constant

Washington

Butler-Barnes

S. T.

Ewing

A. P.

(2024). Perceived discrimination, mental health help-seeking attitudes, and suicide ideation, planning, and attempts among Black young adults. BMC Public Health, 24(1), 2019. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-024-19519-1

12.

Bozkurt

Küçük Alemdar

(2025). The mediating role of mental health promoting knowledge level in the relationship between emotional literacy and psychological help seeking attitudes in adolescents. Children and Youth Services Review, 174(2025), 108344. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2025.108344

13.

Brooms

D. R.

(2025). “Every day we wake up with something to prove”: Black misandry and Black men's experiences in navigating the college environment. Sociology of Race and Ethnicity, 11(1), 17–31. https://doi.org/10.1177/23326492241259982

14.

Brown

A. L.

(2018). From subhuman to human kind: Implicit bias, racial memory, and Black males in schools and society. Peabody Journal of Education, 93(1), 52–65. https://doi.org/10.1080/0161956X.2017.1403176

15.

Bryan

DeJohnette

Johnson

(2024). They can play, but.: Investigating teachers’ use of exclusionary discipline practices as anti-black misandric restrictions of Black boyhood play in early childhood classrooms. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 47(2024), 100840. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2024.100840

16.

Bureau of Labor Statistics . (2024). Contingent and alternative employment arrangements. https://www.bls.gov/news.release/conemp.toc.htm

17.

Bushway

Cabreros

Paige

J. W.

Schwam

Wenger

J. B.

(2022). Barred from employment: More than half of unemployed men in their 30s had a criminal history of arrest. Science Advances, 8(7), eabj6992. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abj6992

18.

Calabrese

Lee

Mollica

M. A.

Wiener

Mendley

Adams

Blachman-Demner

(2022). Navigating pediatric to adult healthcare transition: A national institutes of health workshop. The Journal of Pediatrics, 244, 234–240. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpeds.2022.01.052

19.

Camardelle

(2023). Five charts to understand Black registered apprentices in the United States. Joint Center for Political and Economic Studies. https://jointcenter.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/Five-Charts-To-Understand-Black-Registered-Apprentices-in-the-United-States.pdf

20.

Capps

K. P.

Updegraff

J. A.

(2023). How future orientations predict healthy outcomes: Information avoidance as a potential mechanism. Journal of Health Psychology, 29(8), 848–862. https://doi.org/10.1177/13591053231214516

21.

Carlson

L. C.

Zachrison

K. S.

Yun

B. J.

Ciccolo

White

B. A.

Camargo

C. A.

Jr. Samuels-Kalow

M. E.

(2021). The association of demographic, socioeconomic, and geographic factors with potentially preventable emergency department utilization. Western Journal of Emergency Medicine, 22(6), 1283–1290. https://doi.org/10.5811/westjem.2021.5.50233

22.

Cénat

J. M.

McIntee

S.-E.

Mukunzi

J. N.

Noorishad

P.-G.

(2021). Overrepresentation of Black children in the child welfare system: A systematic review to understand and better act. Children and Youth Services Review, 120(2021), 105714. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2020.105714

23.

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention . (2025). Web-based Injury Statistics Query and Reporting System (WISQARS) fatal injury reports. https://wisqars.cdc.gov

24.

Chatmon

B. N.

(2020). Males and mental health stigma. American Journal of Men's Health, 14(4), 1557988320949322. https://doi.org/10.1177/1557988320949322

25.

Clark (2012). Negotiating stigmatized identities and overcoming barriers to inclusion in the transition to adulthood. In Azzopardi

Grech

(Eds.), Inclusive communities: A critical reader (pp. 85–102). Brill.

26.

Coleman-Kirumba

Smith

A. L.

Bailey

(2023). Reframing masculinity: Culturally tailored interventions for Black men’s mental health. Journal of Black Psychology, 49(2), 32–57. https://doi.org/10.1177/00957984221098122

27.

Collins-Anderson

Vahedi

Hutson

Hudson

(2022). Intersectionality and mental health among emerging adult Black American men: A scoping review. Current Psychiatry Reports, 24(12), 819–830. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11920-022-01386-5

28.

Corrigan

P. W.

Miller

F. E.

(2004). Shame, blame, and contamination: A review of the impact of mental illness stigma on family members. Journal of Mental Health, 13(6), 537–548. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638230400017004

29.

Corrigan

P. W.

Watson

A. C.

(2002). The paradox of self-stigma and mental illness. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 9(1), 35–53. https://doi.org/10.1093/clipsy.9.1.35

30.

Courtenay

W. H.

(2000). Constructions of masculinity and their influence on men's well-being: A theory of gender and health. Social Science & Medicine, 50(10), 1385–1401. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0277-9536(99)00390-1

31.

Crenshaw

(1989). Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: A Black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory and antiracist politics. University of Chicago Legal Forum, 139(1), 139–167. https://chicagounbound.uchicago.edu/uclf/vol1989/iss1/8.

32.

Curry

T. J.

(2017). The man-not: Race, class, genre, and the dilemmas of Black manhood. Temple University Press.

33.

Curry

T. J.

Utley

E. A.

(2018). She touched me: Five snapshots of adult sexual violations of Black boys. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal, 28(2), 205–241. https://doi.org/10.1353/ken.2018.0014

34.

Curtis

M. G.

Oshri

Bryant

C. M.

Bermudez

J. M.

Kogan

S. M.

(2021). Contextual adversity and rural Black men’s masculinity ideology during emerging adulthood. Psychology of Men & Masculinities, 22(2), 217–226. https://doi.org/10.1037/men0000319

35.

Czeisler

M. É.

Wiley

J. F.

Czeisler

C. A.

Rajaratnam

S. M. W.

Howard

M. E.

(2021). Uncovering survivorship bias in longitudinal mental health surveys during the COVID-19 pandemic. Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences, 30, Article e45. https://doi.org/10.1017/S204579602100038X

36.

Dennis

Zolnikov

T. R.

(2023). Demystifying male emotional development: Exploring the implications of forced gender roles on Black American males. Journal of Black Psychology, 50(1), 68–90. https://doi.org/10.1177/00957984231191868

37.

Dunbar

A. S.

Zeytinoglu

Leerkes

E. M.

(2021). When is parental suppression of black children’s negative emotions adaptive? The role of preparation for racial bias and children’s resting cardiac vagal tone. Research on Child and Adolescent Psychopathology, 50(2), 163–176. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10802-021-00779-z

38.

Ebenstein

J. A.

(2018). The geography of mass incarceration: Prison gerrymandering and the dilution of prisoners’ political representation. Fordham Urban Law Journal, 45(2), 323–372. https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/ulj/vol45/iss2/2/.

39.

Ellenbogen

M. I.

Weygandt

P. L.

Newman-Toker

D. E.

Anderson

Rim

Brotman

D. J.

(2024). Race and ethnicity and diagnostic testing for common conditions in the acute care setting. JAMA Network Open, 7(8), e2430306. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.30306

40.

Essed

(1991). Understanding everyday racism: An interdisciplinary theory. Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781483345239

41.

Franklin

A. J.

Boyd-Franklin

(2000). Invisibility syndrome: A clinical model of the effects of racism on African-American males. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 70(1), 33–41. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0087691

42.

Frederick

D. A.

Crerand

C. E.

Brown

T. A.

Perez

Best

C. R.

Cook-Cottone

C. P.

Compte

E. J.

Convertino

Gordon

A. R.

Malcarne

V. L.

Nagata

J. M.

Parent

M. C.

Pennesi

J.-L.

Pila

Rodgers

R. F.

Schaefer

L. M.

Thompson

J. K.

Tylka

T. L.

Murray

S. B.

(2022). Demographic predictors of body image satisfaction: The U.S. Body Project I. Body Image, 41, 17–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2022.01.011

43.

Fremstad

Cai

J. Y.

Curchin

(2023). Are young men falling behind young women? The NEET rate helps shed light on the matter. Center for Economic and Policy Research. https://cepr.net/publications/are-young-men-falling-behind-young-women-the-neet-rate-helps-shed-light-on-the-matter

44.

Gariépy

Danna

S. M.

Hawke

Henderson

Iyer

S. N.

(2021). The mental health of young people who are not in education, employment, or training: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 57(6), 1107–1121. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00127-021-02212-8

45.

Gee

G. C.

Verissimo

A. D. O.

(2016). Racism and behavioral outcomes over the life course. In Alvarez

A. N.

Liang

C. T. H.

Neville

H. A.

(Eds.), The cost of racism for people of color: Contextualizing experiences of discrimination (pp. 133–162). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/14852-007

46.

Gere

Salimi

(2025). Mental health literacy, stigma, and help-seeking behavior among Black male college students in historically black universities. American Journal of Men's Health, 19(1), 15579883251318214. https://doi.org/10.1177/15579883251318214

47.

Gershoff

E. T.

Font

S. A.

(2016). Corporal punishment in U.S. public schools: Prevalence, disparities in use, and status in state and federal policy. Social Policy Report / Society for Research in Child Development, 30(1), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2379-3988.2016.tb00086.x

48.

Getzen

Ungar

Mowery

Jiang

Long

(2023). Mining for equitable health: Assessing the impact of missing data in electronic health records. Journal of Biomedical Informatics, 139, 104269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbi.2022.104269

49.

Ghandnoosh

(2023). One in five: Ending racial inequity in incarceration. The Sentencing Project. https://www.sentencingproject.org/reports/one-in-five-ending-racial-inequity-in-incarceration/

50.

Godsil

R. D.

McGill Johnson

(2013). Transforming perception: Black men and boys. Perception Institute. https://perception.org/publications/transforming-perception/

51.

Goodwill

J. R.

Johnson

N. C.

Watkins

D. C.

(2020). Adherence to masculine norms and depressive symptoms in young black men. Social Work, 65(3), 235–244. https://doi.org/10.1093/sw/swaa029

52.

GOT Transition . (2025). Six core elements of health care transition. The National Alliance to Advance Adolescent Health. https://www.gottransition.org/six-core-elements/transitioning-youth-to-adult/transfer-of-care.cfm

53.

Guan

Guariglia

Moore

Al-Janabi

(2022). Financial stress and depression in adults: A systematic review. PLoS One, 17(2), e0264041. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0264041

54.

Hagiwara

Slatcher

R. B.

Eggly

Penner

L. A.

(2017). Physician racial bias and word use during racially discordant medical interactions. Health Communication, 32(4), 401–408. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2016.1138389

55.

Halfon

Forrest

C. B.

(2017). The emerging theoretical framework of life course health development. In Halfon

(Ed.), Handbook of life course health development (pp. 19–43). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47143-3_2

56.

Hammond

W. P.

(2012). Taking it like a man: Masculine role norms as moderators of the racial discrimination–depressive symptoms association among African American men. American Journal of Public Health, 102(S2), S232–S241. https://doi.org/10.2105/ajph.2011.300485

57.

Hester

Gray

(2018). For Black men, being tall increases threat stereotyping and police stops. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(11), 2711–2715. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1714454115

58.

Hines

E. M.

Fletcher

E. C.

Ford

D. Y.

Moore

J. L.

(2021). Preserving innocence: Ending perceived adultification and toxic masculinity toward Black boys. Journal of Family Strengths, 21(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.58464/2168-670x.1444

59.

Hooper

L. M.

Tomek

Bond

J. M.

Reif

M. S.

(2014). Race/ethnicity, gender, parentification, and psychological functioning: Comparisons among a nationwide university sample. The Family Journal, 23(1), 33–48. https://doi.org/10.1177/1066480714547187

60.

Hughes

Rodriguez

Smith

E. P.

Johnson

D. J.

Stevenson

H. C.

Spicer

(2006). Parents' ethnic-racial socialization practices: A review of research and directions for future study. Developmental Psychology, 42(5), 747–770. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.42.5.747

61.

Hulland

(2020). Conceptual review papers: Revisiting existing research to develop and refine theory. AMS Review, 10(1–2), 27–35. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13162-020-00168-7

62.

Jackson

B. A.

(2018). Beyond the cool pose: Black men and emotion management strategies. Sociology Compass, 12(4), e12569. https://doi.org/10.1111/soc4.12569

63.

Jamieson

P. E.

Romer

(2008). Unrealistic fatalism in U.S. youth ages 14 to 22: Prevalence and characteristics. Journal of Adolescent Health, 42(2), 154–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2007.07.010

64.

Johnson

(2024). Diondre also has bad days: Cannabis use and the criminalization of Black youth. The Professional Counselor, 13(4), 433–447. https://doi.org/10.15241/rj.13.4.433

65.

Johnson

S. R. L.

Blum

R. W.

Cheng

T. L.

(2014). Future orientation: A construct with implications for adolescent health and wellbeing. International Journal of Adolescent Medicine and Health, 26(4), 459–468. https://doi.org/10.1515/ijamh-2013-0333

66.

Jones-Eversley

S. D.

Rice

Adedoyin

A. C.

James-Townes

(2020). Premature deaths of young Black males in the United States. Journal of Black Studies, 51(3), 251–272. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021934719895999

67.

Kajstura

(2024). If the Census Bureau truly values accuracy, it should count incarcerated people at home. Prison Policy Initiative. https://www.prisonersofthecensus.org/news/2024/10/30/group_quarters_errors

68.

Kirk

D. S.

Sampson

R. J.

(2012). Juvenile arrest and collateral educational damage in the transition to adulthood. Sociology of Education, 88(1), 36–62. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038040712448862

69.

Kirtley

O. J.

Lafit

Vaessen

Decoster

Derom

Gülöksüz

De Hert

Jacobs

Menne-Lothmann

Rutten

B. P. F.

Thiery

Van Os

van Winkel

Wichers

Myin-Germeys

(2022). The relationship between daily positive future thinking and past-week suicidal ideation in youth: An experience sampling study. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 13, 915007. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2022.915007

70.

Kunstman

J. W.

Ogungbadero

Deska

J. C.

Bernstein

M. J.

Smith

A. R.

Hugenberg

(2023). Race-based biases in psychological distress and treatment judgments. PLoS One, 18(10), e0293078. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0293078

71.

Laing

Brown

C. T.

Hamer

J. F.

(2025). No time for childhood. Journal of African American Studies, 29(3), 296–316. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12111-025-09705-9

72.

Lee

Hodgkin

Johnson

M. P.

Porell

F. W.

(2021). Medicaid expansion and racial and ethnic disparities in access to health care: Applying the national academy of medicine definition of health care disparities. Inquiry, 58(46958021991293), 46958021991293. https://doi.org/10.1177/0046958021991293

73.

Link

B. G.

Phelan

J. C.

(2001). Conceptualizing stigma. Annual Review of Sociology, 27(1), 363–385. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.27.1.363

74.

Lippold

M. A.

Jensen

Chase

G. E.

Wyman

Jenkins

M. R.

Mohanty

Bodenmann

(2024). Parent strategies to help emerging adults manage stress are associated with their mental health: A dyadic coping perspective. Family Process, 63(4), 1964–1981. https://doi.org/10.1111/famp.12991

75.

Loiseau

K. J.

Mahalik

J. R.

(2025). Gendered racism and mental health for Black men in the United States: Examining moderating factors. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 72(3), 223–239. https://doi.org/10.1037/cou0000779

76.

London

Downey

Bonica

Paltin

(2007). Social causes and consequences of rejection sensitivity. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 17(3), 481–506. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-7795.2007.00531.x

77.

Q. S.

Leicht

(2025). Low-waged hourly employment as a form of precarious work: Racial and ethnic disparity and its implications. Social Indicators Research, 180(3), 1765–1795. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-025-03725-4

78.

Lukachko

Myer

Hankerson

(2015). Religiosity and mental health service utilization among African-Americans. The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 203(8), 578–582. https://doi.org/10.1097/NMD.0000000000000334

79.

Majors

Billson

J. M.

(1992). Cool pose: The dilemmas of Black manhood in America. Lexington Books.

80.

Mallory

Arogundade

White

(2025). Breaking barriers: Understanding the motivations and challenges of Black men in mental health careers. Journal of Black Psychology, 52(2), 195–225. https://doi.org/10.1177/00957984251393962

81.

Maraj

Mustafa

Joober

Malla

Shah

J. L.

Iyer

S. N.

(2019). Caught in the ‘NEET trap’: The intersection between vocational inactivity and disengagement from an early intervention service for psychosis. Psychiatric Services, 70(4), 302–308. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ps.201800319

82.

Marotta

P. L.

Voisin

D. R.

(2017). Testing three pathways to substance use and delinquency among low-income African American adolescents. Children and Youth Services Review, 75, 7–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2017.02.009

83.

McCreary

D. R.

Oliffe

J. L.

Black

Flannigan

Rachert

Goldenberg

S. L.

(2020). Canadian men’s health stigma, masculine role norms and lifestyle behaviors. Health Promotion International, 35(3), 535–543. https://doi.org/10.1093/heapro/daz049

84.

McNair

F. D.

Havens

Surko

Weinberger

Baetz

Moaveni

Bart

Marr

Quinlan

Horwitz

S. M.

(2019). Post-traumatic stress and related symptoms among juvenile detention residents: Results from intake screening. Child Abuse & Neglect, 92(2019), 22–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2019.03.011

85.

Mello

Z. R.

Worrell

F. C.

(2006). The relationship of time perspective to age, gender, and academic achievement among academically talented adolescents. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 29(3), 271–289. https://doi.org/10.1177/016235320602900302

86.

Muralidharan

Lucksted

Medoff

Fang

L. J.

Dixon

(2014). Stigma: A unique source of distress for family members of individuals with mental illness. The Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research, 43(3), 484–493. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11414-014-9437-4

87.

O’Dea

C. J.

Bueno

A. M. C.

Saucier

D. A.

(2017). Fight or flight: Perceptions of men who confront versus ignore threats to themselves and others. Personality and Individual Differences, 104(2017), 345–351. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.08.040

88.

Olbert

C. M.

Nagendra

Buck

(2018). Meta-analysis of Black vs. White racial disparity in schizophrenia diagnosis in the United States: Do structured assessments attenuate racial disparities? Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 127(1), 104–115. https://doi.org/10.1037/abn0000309

89.

Oshri

Duprey

E. B.

Kogan

S. M.

Carlson

M. W.

Liu

(2018). Growth patterns of future orientation among maltreated youth: A prospective examination of the emergence of resilience. Developmental Psychology, 54(8), 1456–1471. https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0000528

90.

Papadopoulos

Foster

Caldwell

(2012). Individualism-collectivism’ as an explanatory device for mental illness stigma. Community Mental Health Journal, 49(3), 270–280. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10597-012-9534-x

91.

Parcesepe

A. M.

Cabassa

L. J.

(2013). Public stigma of mental illness in the United States: A systematic literature review. Administration and Policy in Mental Health, 40(5), 384–399. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-012-0430-z

92.

Pawlak

Moustafa

A. A.

(2023). A systematic review of the impact of future-oriented thinking on academic outcomes. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1190546. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1190546

93.

Pharr

J. R.

Moonie

Bungum

T. J.

(2011). The impact of unemployment on mental and physical health, access to health care and health risk behaviors. ISRN Public Health, 2012, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.5402/2012/483432

94.

Powell

Adams

L. B.

Cole-Lewis

Agyemang

Upton

R. D.

(2016). Masculinity and race-related factors as barriers to health help-seeking among African American men. Behavioral Medicine, 42(3), 150–163. https://doi.org/10.1080/08964289.2016.1165174

95.

Roy

Messina

Smith

Waters

(2014). Growing up as ‘man of the house’: Adultification and transition into adulthood for young men in economically disadvantaged families. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 2014(143), 55–72. https://doi.org/10.1002/cad.20054

96.

Schwartz

L. A.

Brumley

L. D.

Tuchman

L. K.

Barakat

L. P.

Hobbie

W. L.

Ginsberg

J. P.

Daniel

L. C.

Kazak

A. E.

Bevans

Deatrick

J. A.

(2013). Stakeholder validation of a model of readiness for transition to adult care. JAMA Pediatrics, 167(10), 939–946. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapediatrics.2013.2223

97.

Scott

J. C.

Pinderhughes

E. E.

(2019). Distinguishing between demographic and contextual factors linked to early childhood physical discipline and physical maltreatment among Black families. Child Abuse & Neglect, 94, 104020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2019.05.013

98.

Seidler

Z. E.

Dawes

A. J.

Rice

S. M.

Oliffe

J. L.

Dhillon

H. M.

(2016). The role of masculinity in men’s help-seeking for depression: A systematic review. Clinical Psychology Review, 49, 106–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2016.09.002

99.

Serpe

R. T.

Stryker

(2011). The symbolic interactionist perspective and identity theory. In Schwartz

S. J.

Luyckx

Vignoles

V. L.

(Eds.), Handbook of identity theory and research (pp. 225–248). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-7988-9_10

100.

Shavers-Hornaday

V. L.

Lynch

C. F.

Burmeister

L. F.

Torner

J. C.

(1997). Why are African Americans under-represented in medical research studies? Impediments to participation. Ethnicity and Health, 2(1–2), 31–45. https://doi.org/10.1080/13557858.1997.9961813

101.

Shea

Dotson

Tyree

Ogbu-Nwobodo

Beck

Shtasel

(2022). Racial and ethnic inequities in inpatient psychiatric civil commitment. Psychiatric Services, 73(12), 1322–1329. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ps.202100342

102.

Shen

Liu

Lian

(2024). Linking undergraduates’ future orientation and their employability confidence: The role of vocational identity clarity and internship effectiveness. Acta Psychologica, 248(2024), 104360. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2024.104360

103.

Sim

Lim

W. H.

C. H.

Chin

Y. H.

Yaow

C. Y. L.

Cheong

C. W. Z.

Khoo

C. M.

Samarasekera

D. D.

Devi

M. K.

Chong

C. S.

(2021). The perspectives of health professionals and patients on racism in healthcare: A qualitative systematic review. PLoS One, 16(8), e0255936. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0255936

104.

Skinner

A. T.

Çiftçi

Jones

Klotz

Ondrušková

Lansford

J. E.

Alampay

L. P.

Al-Hassan

S. M.

Bacchini

Bornstein

M. H.

Chang

Deater-Deckard

Di Giunta

Dodge

K. A.

Gurdal

Liu

Long

Oburu

Pastorelli

, Yotanyamaneewong

(2022). Adolescent positivity and future orientation, parental psychological control, and young adult internalising behaviours during Covid-19 in nine countries. Social Sciences, 11(2), 75. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci11020075

105.

Slatton

B. C.

Spates

Faniel

M. L.

(2025). Black men’s patient–clinician experiences: Pathways to enhanced healthcare outcomes in the United States. Healthcare, 13(11), 1230. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare13111230

106.

Solari

C. D.

Acs

Evans

L. D.

(2025). Upward mobility predictor assessments: Evidence resource library for the upward mobility framework. Urban Institute. https://upward-mobility.urban.org/upward-mobility-predictor-assessments

107.

Stanaland

Gaither

Gassman-Pines

(2023). When is masculinity ‘fragile’? An expectancy-discrepancy-threat model of masculine identity. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 27(4), 359–377. https://doi.org/10.1177/10888683221141176

108.

Sun

Oliwa

Peek

M. E.

Tung

E. L.

(2022). Negative patient descriptors: Documenting racial bias in the electronic health record. Health Affairs, 41(2), 203–211. https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2021.01423

109.

Sun

Crooks

Kemnitz

Westergaard

R. P.

(2018). Re-entry experiences of Black men living with HIV/AIDS after release from prison: Intersectionality and implications for care. Social Science & Medicine, 211(2018), 78–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.06.003

110.

Thomas

Duffrin

Mazurek

Clay

S. L.

Hodges

(2020). Community violence and African American male health outcomes: An integrative review of literature. Health and Social Care in the Community, 28(6), 1884–1897. https://doi.org/10.1111/hsc.13065

111.

Tuchinda

(2023). Disproportionate school brutality upon black children. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4581314

112.

Umberson

Williams

Thomas

P. A.

Liu

Thomeer

M. B.

(2014). Race, gender, and chains of disadvantage: Childhood adversity, social relationships, and health. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 55(1), 20–38. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022146514521426

113.

VanHook

(2025). Perceptions, attitudes, and experiences regarding mental health care among young black men. American Journal of Men's Health, 19(1), 15579883241310755. https://doi.org/10.1177/15579883241310755

114.

Wang

Codling

Bhugra

Msosa

Broadbent

Patel

Roberts

McGuire

Stewart

Dobson

Harland

(2023). Unraveling ethnic disparities in antipsychotic prescribing among patients with psychosis: A retrospective cohort study based on electronic clinical records. Schizophrenia Research, 260(2023), 168–179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.schres.2023.08.024

115.

Watkins

D. C.

Hawkins

Mitchell

J. A.

(2014). The discipline's escalating whisper: Social work and Black men's mental health. Research on Social Work Practice, 25(2), 240–250. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049731514526621

116.

Waytz

Hoffman

K. M.

Trawalter

(2014). A superhumanization bias in Whites’ perceptions of Blacks. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 6(3), 352–359. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550614553642

117.

Widanaralalage

B. K.

Jennings

Dando

Mackenzie

J.-M.

(2024). Prevalence, disclosure, and help seeking in Black and Asian male survivors of sexual violence in the United Kingdom: A rapid review. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 25(4), 3299–3314. https://doi.org/10.1177/15248380241246217

118.

Wippold

G. M.

Abshire

D. A.

Garcia

K. A.

Crichlow

Frary

S. G.

Murphy

E. R.

Frank

Johnson

Woods

(2024). Lessons learned from a community-based men’s health fair. Journal of Primary Care & Community Health, 15, 21501319231222766. https://doi.org/10.1177/21501319231222766

119.

Woodward

A. T.

Taylor

R. J.

Chatters

L. M.

(2011). Use of professional and informal support by Black men with mental disorders. Research on Social Work Practice, 21(3), 328–336. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049731510388668

120.

Zhavoronkova

Preston

Schweitzer

Amaning

A. K.

(2023). How to improve employment outcomes for young adults leaving incarceration. Center for American Progress. https://www.americanprogress.org/article/how-to-improve-employment-outcomes-for-young-adults-leaving-incarceration/

121.

Zuniga

K. B.

Borno

Chan

J. M.

Van Blarigan

E. L.

Friedlander

T. W.

Wang

Zhang

Kenfield

S. A.

(2020). The problem of underrepresentation: Black participants in lifestyle trials among patients with prostate cancer. Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities, 7(5), 996–1002. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40615-020-00724-8