The manosphere has become a crucial area of study to examine the rise of online masculinist subcultures and the spread of misogynistic discourses on digital platforms. This article presents a scoping review of research from 2018 to 2023 in English and Spanish within the Humanities and Social Sciences, focusing on methodologies, geographical distribution, key topics, communities, and research gaps. Using the ‘Search, Appraisal, Synthesis, and Analysis’ (SALSA) framework on Scopus and Web of Science, the findings highlight gaps in understanding algorithmic dynamics, interactions between communities, and radicalization among young men. The study also emphasizes the importance of cultural and intersectional approaches to address the manosphere’s diverse global and local expressions.
AiolfiI.PalenaN.Ó CiardhaC.CasoL. (2024). The incel phenomenon: A systematic scoping review. Current Psychology, 43(32), 26264–26278. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-024-06236-6
2.
AistonJ. (2023). Vicious, vitriolic, hateful and hypocritical’: The representation of feminism within the manosphere. Critical Discourse Studies, 21(6), 703–720. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2023.2257816
3.
BachaudL.JohnsS. E. (2023). The use and misuse of evolutionary psychology in online manosphere communities: The case of female mating strategies. Evolutionary Human Sciences, 5(13), Article e28. https://doi.org/10.1017/ehs.2023.22
4.
BaeleS.BraceL.GingD. (2023). A diachronic cross-platforms analysis of violent extremist language in the incel online ecosystem. Terrorism and Political Violence, 36(3), 382–405. https://doi.org/10.1080/09546553.2022.2161373
5.
BaeleS. J.BraceL.CoanT. G. (2021). From ‘incel’ to ‘saint’: Analyzing the violent worldview behind the 2018 Toronto attack. Terrorism and Political Violence, 33(8), 1667–1691. https://doi.org/10.1080/09546553.2019.1638256
6.
BakerC.GingD.BrandtM. (2024). Recommending toxicity: The role of algorithmic recommender functions on YouTube Shorts and TikTok in promoting male supremacist influencers. DCU Anti-bullying Centre. https://antibullyingcentre.ie/uploads/2024/04
7.
Banet-WeiserS. (2018). Empowered: popular feminism and popular misogyny.Duke University Press.
8.
BarcellonaM. (2022). Incel violence as a new terrorism threat: A brief investigation between alt-right and manosphere dimensions. Sortuz, 11(2), 170–186.
BenassiniC. (2022). La construcción del discurso de odio contra las mujeres por los participantes en espacios misóginos de una red social. Revista Internacional de Comunicación y Desarrollo, 4(17), 8757. https://doi.org/10.15304/ricd.4.17.8757
11.
BogetićK. (2022). Race and the language of incels: Figurative neologisms in an emerging English cryptolect. English Today, 39(2), 89–99. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266078422000153
12.
BoothA.PapaioannouD.SuttonA. (2012). Systematic approaches to a successful literature review. SAGE.
13.
BottoM.GottzénL. (2023). Swallowing and spitting out the red pill: Young men, vulnerability, and radicalization pathways in the manosphere. Journal of Gender Studies, 33(5), 596–608. https://doi.org/10.1080/09589236.2023.2260318
14.
BryanE.WarrenS. (2023). The manosphere under the microscope: A critical discourse analysis of the news media reporting of rowan baxter’s murder of hannah clarke and her family. Feminist Media Studies, 25(1), 105–122. https://doi.org/10.1080/14680777.2023.2269033
15.
BurnettS. (2021). The battle for ‘NoFap’: Myths, masculinity, and the meaning of masturbation abstention. Men and Masculinities, 25(3), 477–496. https://doi.org/10.1177/1097184X211018256
16.
Caldevilla-DomínguezD.Barrientos-BáezA.Matarín-Rodríguez-PeralE. (2022). Neurocomunicación y manosferas: Estudio de caso Forocoches. Historia Y Comunicación Social, 27(2), 509–519. https://doi.org/10.5209/hics.84402
17.
CannitoM.Ferrero CamolettoR. (2022). The rules of attraction: An empirical critique of pseudoscientific theories about sex in the manosphere. Sexes, 3(4), 593–607. https://doi.org/10.3390/sexes3040043
18.
CannitoM.MercuriE. (2022). Fatherhood and gender relations in the manosphere: Exploring an Italian non-resident fathers’ online forum. European Journal of Cultural Studies, 25(4), 1010–1029. https://doi.org/10.1177/13675494211036967
19.
ChuaY. T.WilsonL. (2023). Beyond black and white: The intersection of ideologies in online extremist communities. European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research, 29(3), 337–354. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10610-023-09555-9
20.
CodinaL.LopezosaC.FreixaP. (2022). Scoping reviews en trabajos académicos en comunicación: frameworks y fuentes. In Larrondo UretaA.Meso AyerdiK.Peña FernándezS. (Eds.), Información y Big Data en el sistema híbrido de medios - XIII Congreso Internacional de Ciberperiodismo; 15-17 nov 2021 (pp. 67–85). Universidad del País Vasco. https://hdl.handle.net/10230/53155
21.
CoplandS. (2020). Reddit quarantined: Can changing platform affordances reduce hateful material online?Internet Policy Review, 9(4), 1516. https://doi.org/10.14763/2020.4.1516
22.
CosmaS.GurevichM. (2020). Securing sex: Embattled masculinity and the pressured pursuit of women’s bodies in men’s online sex advice. Feminism & Psychology, 30(1), 42–62. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959353519857754
23.
CzerwinskyA. (2024). Misogynist incels gone mainstream: A critical review of the current directions in incel-focused research. Crime, Media, Culture: International Journal, 20(2), 196–217. https://doi.org/10.1177/17416590231196125
24.
DafaureM. (2022). Memes, trolls and the manosphere: Mapping the manifold expressions of antifeminism and misogyny online. European Journal of English Studies, 26(2), 236–254. https://doi.org/10.1080/13825577.2022.2091299
25.
Delgado OntiveroL. (2023). Are young people the root of the rise of misogyny in Spain? Biases and problems in the media coverage of the manosphere and Spanish anti-feminism. Ex Aequo, 48, 69–85. https://doi.org/10.22355/exaequo.2023.48.06
del Pino DíazD. (2023). Expresiones antifeministas en YouTube: Un análisis discursivo del youtuber Roma Gallardo. Cuadernos de Información y Comunicación, 28, 159–177. https://doi.org/10.5209/ciyc.85407
28.
Díaz-FernándezS.García-MingoE. (2022). The bar of Forocoches as a masculine online place: Affordances, masculinist digital practices and trolling. New Media & Society, 26(9), 5336–5358. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448221135631
29.
Díaz FernándezS.García MingoE.FuentesA. (2023). #TeamAlienadas: Anti-feminist ideologic work in the Spanish manosphere. European Journal of Women's Studies, 30(4), 421–439. https://doi.org/10.1177/13505068231173261
30.
DickelV.EvolviG. (2022). Victims of feminism’: Exploring networked misogyny and #MeToo in the manosphere. Feminist Media Studies, 23(4), 1392–1408. https://doi.org/10.1080/14680777.2022.2029925
31.
EddingtonS. M. (2020). Alt-resilience: A semantic network analysis of identity (re)construction in an online men’s rights community. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 48(1), 114–135. https://doi.org/10.1080/00909882.2019.1706099
32.
FarciM.RighettiN. (2019). Italian men’s rights activism and online backlash against feminism. Rassegna Italiana di Sociologia, 4, 765–781. https://doi.org/10.1423/96115
33.
FontanellaL.ChulviB.IgnazziE.SarraA.TontodimammaA. (2024). How do we study misogyny in the digital age? A systematic literature review using a computational linguistic approach. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 11, 478. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-02978-7
34.
FowlerK. (2021). From chads to blackpills: A discursive analysis of the incel’s gendered spectrum of political agency. Deviant Behavior, 43(11), 1406–1417. https://doi.org/10.1080/01639625.2021.1985387
35.
García-MingoE.Díaz FernándezS. (2022). A feminist research proposal for the study of misogyny: Reflexive notes after the research process. Empiria, 56, 83–106. https://doi.org/10.5209/empiria.56.2022.34439
36.
García-MingoE.Díaz FernándezS.Tomás-ForteS. (2022). (Re)configurando el imaginario sobre la violencia sexual desde el antifeminismo: el trabajo ideológico de la manosfera española.Política y Sociedad, 59(1). https://doi.org/10.5209/poso.80369.
37.
García-MingoE.Díaz-FernándezS. (2022b). Wounded men of feminism: Exploring regimes of male victimhood in the Spanish manosphere. European Journal of Cultural Studies, 26(6), 897–915. https://doi.org/10.1177/13675494221140586
38.
GhumkorS.MirH. (2022). A ‘crisis of masculinity’? The West’s cultural wars in the emerging Muslim manosphere. ReOrient, 7(2), 135–157. https://doi.org/10.13169/reorient.7.2.0135
39.
GingD. (2017). Alphas, betas, and incels: Theorizing the masculinities of the manosphere. Men and Masculinities, 22(4), 638–657. https://doi.org/10.1177/1097184X17706401
40.
GingD.LynnT.RosatiP. (2020). Neologising misogyny: Urban Dictionary’s folksonomies of sexual abuse. New Media & Society, 22(5), 838–856. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444819870306
41.
GreenR.FowlerK.PalombiA. (2023). The black pill pipeline: A process-tracing analysis of the incel’s continuum of violent radicalization.Sexualities, 26(3), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1177/13634607231169509
42.
HanX.YinC. (2022). Mapping the manosphere: Categorization of reactionary masculinity discourses in digital environment. Feminist Media Studies, 23(5), 1923–1940. https://doi.org/10.1080/14680777.2021.1998185
43.
HartC. (2008). Doing a literature review: Releasing the social science research imagination. Sage.
HolmM. (2023). Beyond antifeminist discourses: Analyzing how material and social factors shape online resistance to feminist politics. Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society, 30(2), 422–443. https://doi.org/10.1093/sp/jxac022
47.
HoptonK.LangerS. (2022). Kick the XX out of your life’: An analysis of the manosphere’s discursive constructions of gender on Twitter. Feminism & Psychology, 32(1), 3–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/09593535211033461
48.
HoreckT.RingroseJ.MilneB.MendesK. (2023). #MeToo in British schools: Gendered differences in teenagers’ awareness of sexual violence. European Journal of Cultural Studies, 27(5), 856–875. https://doi.org/10.1177/13675494231191490
49.
IgnazziE.MarettiM.FontanellaL. (2025). The Italian manosphere: Composition, structure, and functions of a digital network. Social Inclusion, 13. https://doi.org/10.17645/si.9341
50.
IñigoA.FernándezL.TomasenaJ. M. (2024). Disinterest, normalisation of gender violence and fear of being cancelled: Mediatised learning on antifeminist and anti-LGBTIQ+ discourses among teenagers in Barcelona. International Communication Gazette, 86(5), 420–436. https://doi.org/10.1177/17480485241259837
51.
IvesonM.FormatoF. (2022). Men of today, soyboys of tomorrow: Constructions of masculinities in YouTube responses to gillette’s the best men can Be. Discourse Context & Media, 49(1), 100628. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcm.2022.100628
52.
JaneE. A. (2018). Systemic misogyny exposed: Translating rapeglish from the manosphere with a random rape threat generator. International Journal of Cultural Studies, 21(6), 661–680. https://doi.org/10.1177/1367877917734042
53.
JansonL. (2023). A manosphere brotherhood against the law: Masculinity threat and legal consciousness in online networks for buyers of sex in Illinois. Sexuality Research and Social Policy, 20(2), 714–734. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13178-022-00716-9
54.
JonesC.TrottV.WrightS. (2020). Sluts and soyboys: MGTOW and the production of misogynistic online harassment. New Media & Society, 22(10), 1903–1921. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444819887141
55.
Khosravi OoryardS. (2023). Alt-right and authoritarian memetic alliances: Global mediations of hate within the rising Farsi manosphere on Iranian social media. Media, Culture & Society, 45(2), 198–215. https://doi.org/10.1177/01634437221147633
56.
KimJ. (2022). Wikiality within the manosphere: Namuwiki, gender equalism, and antifeminist disinformation in the post-truth era. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 48(1), 97–123. https://doi.org/10.1086/720430
57.
KrendelA. (2020). The men and women, guys and girls of the ‘manosphere’: A corpus-assisted discourse approach. Discourse & Society, 31(6), 607–630. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926520939690
58.
KrendelA. (2023). Self-help and masculinity: Speech acts in an online men’s group. Pragmatics and Society, 14(6), 844–868. https://doi.org/10.1075/ps.21075.kre
59.
KrendelA.McGlashanM.KollerV. (2022). The representation of gendered social actors across five manosphere communities on Reddit. Corpora, 17(2), 245–267. https://doi.org/10.3366/cor.2022.0257
60.
LacalleC. (2023). The otherless other: Las pasiones misóginas de la manosfera española. Signa: Revista de la Asociación Española de Semiótica, 32(1), 41–53. https://doi.org/10.5944/signa.vol32.2023.36111
61.
LacalleC.Gómez-MoralesB.Vicent-IbáñezM. (2023). Misogyny and the construction of toxic masculinity in the Spanish manosphere (Burbuja.info). Profesional de la Información, 32(2), Article e320215. https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2023.mar.15
62.
LacalleC.Martín JiménezV.Etura HernándezD. (2023). El antifeminismo de la ultraderecha española en Twitter en torno al 8M. Revista Prisma Social, 40, 358–376. https://revistaprismasocial.es/article/view/4837.
63.
LindsayA. (2022). Swallowing the black pill: Involuntary celibates’ (Incels’) discourses of liminal masculinity. Cultural Studies, 36(4), 528–547. https://doi.org/10.1080/09502386.2022.2084861
64.
LiuA. (2021). MRAsians: A convergence between asian American hypermasculine ethnonationalism and the manosphere. Journal of Asian American Studies, 24(1), 93–112. https://doi.org/10.1353/jaas.2021.0012
65.
LorcaJ. G.García-MingoE. (2023). Busca, busca, perrita: Comunidades digitales misóginas de difusión de imágenes sexuales sin consentimiento. Ex Æquo, 48, 15–32. https://doi.org/10.22355/exaequo.2023.48.03
66.
LoveN. S. (2020). Shield maidens, fashy femmes, and tradwives: Feminism, patriarchy, and right-wing populism. Frontiers in Sociology, 5, Article 619572. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsoc.2020.619572
67.
MarwickA. E.CaplanR. (2018). Drinking male tears: Language, the manosphere, and networked harassment. Feminist Media Studies, 18(4), 543–559. https://doi.org/10.1080/14680777.2018.1450568
68.
MassanariA. (2015). #Gamergate and the Fappening: How Reddit’s algorithm, governance, and culture support toxic technocultures, New Media and Society, 19(3), 329–346. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444815608807
69.
McGlashanM.KrendelA. (2023). Keywords of the manosphere. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 29(1), 87–115. https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.22053.mcg
70.
MenzieL. (2020). Stacys, Beckys, and Chads: The construction of femininity and hegemonic masculinity within incel rhetoric. Psychology & Sexuality, 13(1), 69–85. https://doi.org/10.1080/19419899.2020.1806915
NagleA. (2017). Kill all normies: Online culture wars from 4chan and Tumblr to Trump and the alt-right. Zero Books.
74.
NurminenM. (2019). Narrative warfare: The ‘careless’ reinterpretation of literary canon in online antifeminism. Narrative Inquiry, 29(2), 313–332. https://doi.org/10.1075/ni.19019.nu
75.
NurminenM. (2022). From swallowing the red pill to failing to build the wall: Allusive cognitive metaphors in advocating political and extremist views. Poetics Today, 43(2), 309–334. https://doi.org/10.1215/03335372-9642637
76.
O'DonellC.ShorE. (2021). This is a political movement, friend’: Why ‘incels’ support violence. British Journal of Sociology, 73(2), 336–351. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-4446.12923
77.
O’HanlonR.MackintoshC.HolmesH.MeekR. (2023). Conducting ethnographic research in male-dominated environments: Reflections of a(n) (emotional) female researcher.Qualitative Research, 24(4). https://doi.org/10.1177/14687941231206785
78.
O’MalleyR. L.HelmB. (2022). The role of perceived injustice and need for esteem on incel membership online. Deviant Behavior, 44(7), 1026–1043. https://doi.org/10.1080/01639625.2022.2133650
79.
PapadamouK.ZannettouS.BlackburnJ.De CristofaroE.StringhiniG.SirivianosM. (2021). How over is it?’ Understanding the incel community on YouTube. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 5(CSCW2), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1145/3479556
PrazmoE. (2022). In dialogue with non-humans or how women are silenced in incels’ discourse. Languages and Dialogues, 12(3), 383–406. https://doi.org/10.1075/ld.00119.pra
82.
Procope BellD. (2023). Pick-me’ Black women: Tactical patriarchal femininity in the Black manosphere. Feminist Media Studies, 24(8), 1704–1722. https://doi.org/10.1080/14680777.2023.2262163
83.
RibeiroM. H.BlackburnJ.BradlynB.De CristofaroE.StringhiniG.LongS.GreenbergS.ZannettouS. (2021). The evolution of the manosphere across the web. Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media, 15(1), 196–207. https://doi.org/10.1609/icwsm.v15i1.18053
84.
RothermelA.-K. (2020). The other side: Assessing the polarization of gender knowledge through a feminist analysis of the affective-discursive in anti-feminist online communities. Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society, 27(4), 718–741. https://doi.org/10.1093/sp/jxaa024
Scotto di CarloG. (2023a). An analysis of self-other representations in the incelosphere: Between online misogyny and self-contempt. Discourse & Society, 34(1), 3–21. https://doi.org/10.1177/09579265221099380
87.
Scotto di CarloG. (2023b). ‘No does not always mean no’: The discursive representation of female sexual rejection as ‘last minute resistance’ in pick-up artist communities. International Journal of Communication, 17(5111), 5108–5127. https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/20283/4284
88.
SmithD. S.Butler-WarkeA.DavidsonE. L.StevensG. (2022). The ultimate test of self-discipline’: Lockdown and the NoFap community. Sexualities, 27(4), 939–961. https://doi.org/10.1177/13634607221091493
89.
SoleaA. I.SugiuraL. (2023). Mainstreaming the blackpill: Understanding the incel community on TikTok. European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research, 29(3), 311–336. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10610-023-09559-5
90.
StahlG.KeddieA.AdamsB. (2022). The manosphere goes to school: Problematizing incel surveillance through affective boyhood. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 55(3), 366–378. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2022.2097068
91.
ThorburnJ. (2023a). Exiting the manosphere: A gendered analysis of radicalization, diversion and deradicalization narratives from r/IncelExit and r/ExRedPill. Studies in Conflict & Terrorism. https://doi.org/10.1080/1057610X.2023.2244192
92.
ThorburnJ. (2023b). The (de-)radical(-ising) potential of r/IncelExit and r/ExRedPill. European Journal of Cultural Studies, 26(3), 464–471. https://doi.org/10.1177/13675494231153900
93.
TomkinsonS.HarperT.AttwellK. (2020). Confronting incel: Exploring possible policy responses to misogynistic violent extremism. Australian Journal of Political Science, 55(2), 152–169. https://doi.org/10.1080/10361146.2020.1747393
94.
VallergaM.ZurbriggenE. L. (2022). Hegemonic masculinities in the ‘manosphere’: A thematic analysis of beliefs about men and women on the red pill and incel. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy, 22(2), 602–625. https://doi.org/10.1111/asap.12308
95.
van der VlistF. N.HelmondA.DieterM.WeltevredeE. (2024). Super-appification: Conglomeration in the global digital economy. New Media & Society, 27(6), 3314–3337. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448231223419
96.
Van ValkenburghS. P. (2019). She thinks of him as a machine: On the entanglements of neoliberal ideology and misogynist cybercrime. Social Media + Society, 5(3), 119872953. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305119872953
97.
Van ValkenburghS. P. (2021). Digesting the red pill: Masculinity and neoliberalism in the manosphere. Men and Masculinities, 24(1), 84–103. https://doi.org/10.1177/1097184X18816118
98.
VenäläinenS. (2022). Nobody cares for men anymore: Affective-discursive practices around men’s victimisation across online and offline contexts. European Journal of Cultural Studies, 25(4), 1228–1245. https://doi.org/10.1177/13675494211021097
99.
WrightS.TrottV.JonesC. (2020). The pussy ain’t worth it, bro: Assessing the discourse and structure of MGTOW. Information, Communication & Society, 23(6), 908–925. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2020.1751867
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
