Few studies to date have examined Indigenous characters in children’s media. Stereotyping or omission of underrepresented groups contributes to symbolic annihilation of underrepresented groups, such as Indigenous persons. Through a qualitative textual design, the researcher explored how Western-Hemisphere Indigenous masculinity was framed in five Disney animated films. While Indigenous characters were positively portrayed, the researcher found displays of stereotypes, and an absence of character growth.
AhmedS. (2017). News media, movies, and anti-Muslim prejudice: Investigating the role of social contact. Asian Journal of Communication, 27(5), 536–553. https://doi.org/10.1080/01292986.2017.1339720
2.
AleissA. (1994). A race divided: The Indian Westerns of John Ford. American Indian Culture & Research Journal, 18(3), 167–186.
3.
AltheideD. L.SchneiderB. (1996). Process of qualitative document analysis. In AltheideD. L.SchneiderB. (Eds.), Qualitative media analysis (pp. 38–74). SAGE.
4.
AntoineD. M. (2011). Unethical acts: Treating Native men as lurking threat, leaving Native women without voice. Journal of Mass Media Ethics, 26(3), 243–245. https://doi.org/10.1080/08900523.2011.581982
5.
AusterC.MansbachC. (2012). The gender marketing of toys: An analysis of color and type of toy on the Disney store website. Sex Roles, 67(7–8), 375–388. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-012-0177-8
6.
BabbieE. (1992). The practice of social research. Macmillian.
BarbourC. (2015). When Captain America was an Indian: Heroic masculinity, national identity, and appropriation. Popular Culture, 48(2), 269–284. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpcu.12256
9.
BazziniD. G.McIntoshW.SmithS.CookS.HarrisC. (1997). The aging woman in popular film: Underrepresented, unattractive, unfriendly, and unintelligent. Sex Roles, 36(7–8), 531–543. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02766689
10.
BirdS. E. (1999). Gendered construction of the American Indian in popular media. Journal of Communication, 49(3), 61–83.
11.
BraithwaiteC. A. (1997). Sa’ah Naagháí Bik’eh Házhóón: An ethnography of Navajo educational communication practices. Communication Education, 46(4), 219–233. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634529709379097
12.
ConnellR. W. (1987). Hegemonic masculinity and emphasized femininity. In ConnellR. (Ed.), Gender and power: Society, the person, and sexual politics (pp. 183–188). Stanford University Press.
13.
ConnellR. W.MesserschmidtJ. W. (2005). Hegemonic masculinity: Rethinking the concept. Gender & Society, 19(6), 829–859. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243205278639
14.
CorbinJ.StraussA. (1990). Grounded theory research: Procedures, canons and evaluative criteria. Zeitschrift für Soziologie, 19(6), 418–427.
15.
CowardJ. M. (2014). The princess and the squaw: The construction of Native American women in the pictorial press. American Journalism, 31(1), 71–99. https://doi.org/10.1080/08821127.2014.875327
DavisA. M. (2014). Handsome heroes and vile villains: Masculinity in Disney’s feature films. John Libbey.
18.
DubeS. I. (2016). ‘Toys r us’: Toy Story 2 and the re-inscription of normative American masculinities. Social Alternatives, 35(3), 44–49.
19.
EdgertonG.JacksonK. M. (1996). Redesigning Pocahontas: Disney, the “White man’s Indian,” and the marketing of dreams. Journal of Popular Film & Television, 24(2), 90–98. https://doi.org/10.1080/01956051.1996.9943718
EschholzS.BufkinJ.LongJ. (2002). Symbolic reality bites: Women and racial/ethnic minorities in modern film. Sociological Spectrum, 22(3), 299–334. https://doi.org/10.1080/02732170290062658
22.
FitzgeraldM. R. (2010). ‘Evolutionary stages of minorities in the mass media’: An application of Clark’s model to American Indian television representations. Howard Journal of Communications, 21(4), 367–384. https://doi.org/10.1080/10646175.2010.519651
23.
FitzgeraldM. R. (2013). Native Americans on network TV: Stereotypes, myths, and the” good Indian”. Rowman & Littlefield.
24.
FullmerR. (Producer), DindalM. (Director). (2000). The Emperor’s New Groove [Film]. Walt Disney Studios.
25.
GanjeL. A. (2003). Native American stereotypes. In RossS. D.LesterP. M. (Eds.), Images that injure: Pictorial stereotypes in the media (pp. 113–120). Praeger.
26.
GiaccardiS.WardL.SeabrookR.ManagoA.LippmanJ. (2016). Media and modern manhood: Testing associations between media consumption and young men’s acceptance of traditional gender ideologies. Sex Roles, 75(3–4), 151–163. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-016-0588-z
GoffmanE. (1974). Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience. Harvard University Press.
29.
HertogJ.McLeodD. (2001). A multiperspectival approach to framing analysis: A fieldguide. In ReeseS.GandyO.GrantA. (Eds.), Framing public life (pp. 139–161). Erlbaum.
HoweL.MarkowitzH.CummingsD. K. (2013). Seeing red—Hollywood’s pixeled skins: American Indians and film. Michigan State University Press.
32.
JonesM.AlonyI. (2011). Guiding the use of grounded theory in doctoral studies—An example from the Australian film industry. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 6, 95–114.
33.
JoyceN.HarwoodJ. (2014). Improving intergroup attitudes through televised vicarious intergroup contact: Social cognitive processing of ingroup and outgroup information. Communication Research, 41(5), 627–643. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650212447944
34.
KianE. M.AndersonE.VincentJ.MurrayR. (2015). Sport journalists’ views on gay men in sport, society and within sport media. International Review for the Sociology of Sport, 50(8), 895–911. https://doi.org/10.1177/1012690213504101
35.
KleinH.ShiffmanK. S. (2009). Underrepresentation and symbolic annihilation of socially disenfranchised groups (“out groups”) in animated cartoons. Howard Journal of Communications, 20(1), 55–72. https://doi.org/10.1080/10646170802665208
36.
LacroixC. (2004). Images of animated others: The orientalization of Disney’s cartoon heroines fromThe Little Mermaid to The Hunchback of Notre Dame. Popular Communication, 2(4), 213–229. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15405710pc0204_2
37.
LacroixC. (2011). High stakes stereotypes: The emergence of the ‘Casino Indian’ trope in television depictions of contemporary Native Americans. Howard Journal of Communications, 22(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/10646175.2011.546738
38.
LeavittP. A.CovarrubiasR.PerezY. A.FrybergS. A. (2015). ‘Frozen in time’: The impact of Native American media representations on identity and self-understanding. Journal of Social Issues, 71(1), 39–53. https://doi.org/10.1111/josi.12095
39.
LeValdo-GaytonR. (2011). Jacob as Tonto: Perpetuating stereotypes that further marginalize Natives. Journal of Mass Media Ethics, 26(3), 250–253. https://doi.org/10.1080/08900523.2011.581991
40.
Li-VollmerM.LaPointeM. E. (2003). Gender transgression and villainy in animated film. Popular Communication, 1(2), 89–109. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15405710PC0102_2
MarsdenM. T.NachbarJ. (1988). The Indians in the movies. In WilcombW. E. (Ed.), Handbook of North American Indians (pp. 607–616). Smithsonian Institutution.
43.
MartinP. Y.TurnerB. A. (1986). Grounded theory and organizational research. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 22(2), 141–157. https://doi.org/10.1177/002188638602200207
44.
McKeeA. (2001). A beginner’s guide to textual analysis. Metro Magazine, 127, 138–149.
MerskinD. (1998). Sending up signals: A survey of Native American media use and representation in the mass media. Howard Journal of Communications, 9(4), 333–345. https://doi.org/10.1080/106461798246943
47.
MerskinD. (2001). Winnebagos, Cherokees, Apaches, and Dakotas: The persistence of stereotyping of American Indians in American advertising brands. Howard Journal of Communications, 12(3), 159–169. https://doi.org/10.1080/106461701753210439
48.
MillerA.RossS. (2004). They are not us: Framing of American Indians by the Boston Globe. Howard Journal of Communications, 15(4), 245–259. https://doi.org/10.1080/10646170490521716
MyersK. (2012). “Cowboy up!”: Non-hegemonic representations of masculinity in children’s television programming. Journal of Men’s Studies, 20(2), 125–143. https://doi.org/10.3149/jms.2002.125
51.
PentecostJ. (Producer), GabrielM.GoldbergE. (Directors). (1995). Pocahontas [Film]. Walt Disney Studios.
52.
PhoenixA.FroshS. (2001). Positioned by ‘hegemonic’ masculinities: A study of London boys’ narratives of identity. Australian Psychologist, 36(1), 27–35. https://doi.org/10.1080/00050060108259628
53.
ReeseS. D. (2001). Framing public life: A bridging moel for media research. In ReseS. D.GandyO. H.GrantA. E. (Eds.), Framing public life (pp. 7–31). Erlbaum.
54.
RicciardelliR.ClowK.WhiteP. (2010). Investigating hegemonic masculinity: Portrayals of masculinity in men’s lifestyle magazines. Sex Roles, 63(1–2), 64–78. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-010-9764-8
55.
SandelowskiM.Holditch-DavisD.HarrisB. G. (1992). Using qualitative and quantitative methods: The transition to parentood of infertile couples. In GilgunJ. F.DalyK.HandelG. (Eds.), qualitative methods in family research (pp. 301–323.) Sage Publication.
SpencerC. (Producer), DeBloisD.SandersC. (Directors). (2002). Lilo & Stitch [Film]. Walt Disney Studios.
60.
SteeleS. L.ShoresT. (2015). Real and unreal masculinities: The celebrity image in anti-trafficking campaigns. Journal of Gender Studies, 24(4), 419–435. https://doi.org/10.1080/09589236.2014.959477
61.
TuchmanG. (1978). The symbolic annihilation of women by the mass media. In TuchmanG.DanielsA. K.BenetJ. (Eds.), Hearth and home: Images of women in the mass media (pp. 150–174). Oxford University Press.
