To date, work on masculinity ideologies, or the culture-based standards and norms expected of boys and men, has focused almost exclusively on younger adulthood. Given the emphases in men’s lives during middle and late adulthood vis-à-vis young adulthood, it is important to determine what norms script aging men’s lives. The Aging Men’s Masculinity Ideologies Inventory (AMMII) is a measure designed to assess the masculinities relevant to aging men. The present study investigated whether individuals (N = 1,352) of different age groups respond to a scale measuring the gender expectations for aging men in a similar way. Multigroup confirmatory factor analyses were performed to assess the measurement invariance of the AMMII across three age groups—young adults (ages 18–29 years), established adults (ages 30–59 years), and older adults (ages 60+ years). Support for configural, metric, and partial scalar invariance was found, allowing for the comparison of means between groups.
AchenbaumW. A. (2015). A history of ageism since 1969. Generations, 39(3), 10–16.
2.
BaltesP. B.SmithJ. (2003). New frontiers in the future of aging: From successful aging of the young old to the dilemmas of the fourth age. Gerontology, 49(2), 123–135.
3.
BennettK. M. (2007). “No sissy stuff”: Towards a theory of masculinity and expression in older widowed men. Journal of Aging Studies, 21, 347–356. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaging.2007.05.002
4.
BourdieuP. (1984). Distinction. Harvard University Press.
5.
CalasantiT. (2004). Feminist gerontology and old men. The Journals of Gerontology, Series B: Psychological Sciences & Social Sciences, 59, S305–S314. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/59.6.S305
ChenF. F. (2007). Sensitivity of goodness-of-fit indexes to lack of measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 14, 464–504. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705510701301834
8.
CheungG. W.LauR. S. (2012). A direct comparison approach for testing measurement invariance. Organizational Research Methods, 15, 167–198. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428111421987
9.
CheungG. W.RensvoldR. B. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 9, 233–255. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15328007SEM0902_5
10.
ColesT. (2008). Finding space in the field of masculinity: Lived experiences of men’s masculinities. Journal of Sociology, 44, 233–248. https://doi.org/10.1177/1440783308092882
DanneferD. (2003). Cumulative advantage/disadvantage and the life course: Cross-fertilizing age and social science theory. The Journals of Gerontology, Series B: Psychological Sciences & Social Sciences, 58, S327–S337. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/58.6.S327
14.
DanneferD. (2018). Systemic and reflexive: Foundations of cumulative dis/advantage and life-course processes. The Journals of Gerontology, Series B: Psychological Sciences & Social Sciences. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gby118
15.
GergenK. J. (1985). The social constructionist movement in modern psychology. American Psychologist, 40, 266–275. https://doi.org/10.1037/10112-044
16.
GilleardC.HiggsP. (2000). Cultures of ageing: Self, citizen, and the body. Pearson Education.
17.
HornJ. L.McArdleJ. J. (1992). A practical and theoretical guide to measurement invariance in aging research. Experimental Aging Research, 18, 117–144. https://doi.org/10.1080/03610739208253916
18.
JacksonD. (2016). Exploring aging masculinities: The body, sexuality, and social lives. Palgrave Macmillan.
19.
KahnJ. H. (2006). Factor analysis in counseling psychology research, training, and practice: Principles, advances, and applications. The Counseling Psychologist, 34, 684–718. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000006286347
KlineR. B. (2016). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (4th ed.). Guilford Press.
22.
LevantR. F.HallR. J.RankinT. J. (2013). Male Role Norms Inventory-Short Form (MRNI-SF): Development, confirmatory factor analytic investigation of structure, and measurement invariance across gender. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 60, 228–238. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0031545
23.
LevantR. F.McDermottR.ParentM. C.AlshabaniN.MahalikJ. R.HammerJ. H. (2020). Development and evaluation of a new short form of the Conformity to Masculine Norms Inventory (CMNI-30). Journal of Counseling Psychology. Advance online publication. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/cou0000414
24.
LevantR. F.RichmondK. (2016). The gender role strain paradigm and masculinity ideologies. In WongY. J.WesterS. R. (Eds.), APA handbook on men and masculinities (pp. 23–49). American Psychological Association.
25.
LevantR. F.WebsterB. A.StanleyJ. T.ThompsonE. H.Jr. (2020). The Aging Men’s Masculinity Ideologies Inventory (AMMII): Dimensionality, variance composition, measurement invariance by gender, and validity. Psychology of Men & Masculinity, 21, 46–57. https://doi.org/10.1037/men0000208
26.
LindauS. T.GavrilovaN. (2010). Sex, health, and years of sexually active life gained due to good health: Evidence from two US population based cross sectional surveys of ageing. BMJ, 340(2010), Article c810. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.c810
27.
LindauS. T.SchummL. P.LaumannE. O.LevinsonW.O’MuircheartaighC. A.WaiteL. J. (2007). A study of sexuality and health among older adults in the United States. New England Journal of Medicine, 357, 762–774.
28.
MahalikJ. R.LockeB. D.LudlowL. H.DiemerM. A.ScottR. P. J.GottfriedM.FreitasG. (2003). Development of the Conformity to Masculine Norms Inventory. Psychology of Men & Masculinity, 4, 3–25. https://doi.org/10.1037/1524-9220.4.1.3
29.
McKibbenW. B.SilvaP. J. (2016). Inattentive and socially desirable responding: Addressing subtle threats to validity in quantitative counseling research. Counseling Outcome Research and Evaluation, 7, 53–64. https://doi.org/10.1177/2150137815613135
30.
MeadeA. W.LautenschlagerG. J. (2004). A Monte-Carlo study of confirmatory factor analytic tests of measurement equivalence/invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 11, 60–72. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojs.2015.53022
MossM. S.MossS. Z. (1996). Remarriage of widowed persons: A triadic relationship. In KlassD.SilvermanP. R.NickmanS. L. (Eds.), Continuing bonds: New understandings of grief (pp. 163–178). Taylor & Francis.
33.
MuthénL. K.MuthénB. O. (1998–2015). Mplus user’s guide (7th ed.).
34.
NeugartenB. L. (1974). Age groups in American society and the rise of the young-old. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 415(1), 187–198.
35.
ÖbergP. (2003). Images versus experience of the aging body. In FairclothC. (Ed.), Aging bodies: Images and everyday experience (pp. 103–139). AltaMira Press.
36.
ParentM. C. (2011). Handling item-level missing data: Simpler is just as good. The Counseling Psychologist, 41, 568–600. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000012445176
37.
RowntreeM. R. (2014). “Comfortable in my own skin”: A new form of sexual freedom for ageing baby boomers. Journal of Aging Studies, 31, 150–158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaging.2014.09.006
38.
SandbergL. (2013). Just feeling a naked body close to you: Men, sexuality and intimacy in later life. Sexualities, 16(3–4), 261–282. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1363460713481726
39.
SatorraA.BentlerP. M. (1999). A scaled difference chi-square test statistic for moment structure analysis (UCLA Statistics Series #260). University of California, Los Angeles.
40.
SchlomerG. L.BaumanS.CardN. A. (2010). Best practices for missing data management in counseling psychology. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 57, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018082
41.
SmilerA. P. (2006). Conforming to masculine norms: Evidence for validity among adult men and women. Sex Roles, 54(11–12), 767–775. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-006-9045-8
42.
SmithG. D.WinchesterH. P. (1998). Negotiating space: Alternative masculinities at the work/home boundary. The Australian Geographer, 29, 327–339. https://doi.org/10.1080/00049189808703227
Spector-MerselG. (2006). Never-aging stories: Western hegemonic masculinity scripts. Journal of Gender Studies, 15, 67–82. https://doi.org/10.1080/09589230500486934
45.
SpringerK. W.MouzonD. M. (2011). “Macho men” and preventive health care: Implications for older men in different social classes. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 52, 212–227. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0022146510393972
46.
SpringerK. W.MouzonD. M. (2019). One step toward more research on aging masculinities: Operationalizing the Hegemonic Masculinity for Older Men Scale (HMOMS). The Journal of Men’s Studies, 27, 183–203. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1060826518806020
47.
StGeorgeJ. M.FletcherR. J. (2014). Men’s experiences of grandfatherhood: A welcome surprise. The International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 78(4), 351–378. https://doi.org/10.2190%2FAG.78.4.c
48.
TheodoreH.LloydB. F. (2000). Age and gender role conflict: A cross-sectional study of Australian men. Sex Roles, 42(11–12), 1027–1042.
49.
ThompsonE. H.Jr. (2019). Men, masculinities, and aging: The gendered lives of older men. Roman & Littlefield.
50.
ThompsonE. H.Jr.BennettK. M. (2015). Measurement of masculinity ideologies: A (critical) review. Psychology of Men & Masculinity, 16, 115–133. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0038609
ThompsonE. H.Jr.PleckJ. H.FerreraD. L. (1992). Men and masculinities: Scales for masculinity ideology and masculinity-related constructs. Sex Roles, 27(11–12), 573–607.
53.
ThompsonE. H.Jr.WeaverA. J. (2016). Making connections: The legacy of an intergenerational program. The Gerontologist, 56(5), 909–918. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnv064
54.
TraceyT. J. G. (2016). A note on socially desirable responding. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 63, 224–232. https://doi.org/10.1037/cou0000135
55.
VandenbergR. J.LanceC. E. (2000). A review and synthesis of the measurement invariance literature: Suggestions, practices, and recommendations for organizational research. Organizational Research Methods, 3, 4–70. https://doi.org/10.1177/109442810031002
