There has been a recent influx of popular U.S. television dramas depicting heteronormative but emotionally conflicted male protagonists. This article examines discursive constructions of hegemonic masculinity in two of these dramas, Sons of Anarchy (2008-2014) and Ray Donovan (2013-), in terms of the socio-cultural concepts of the New Lad and the New Man. It questions whether these discursive tools are useful for analyses of contemporary, male-focalized television, or whether they need updating. Using Critical Discourse Analysis, I argue that protagonists from both programs embody mutated, destabilized versions of the New Lad and the New Man that connect to a current U.S. “crisis of masculinity.” Offering timely conceptual updates of the New Lad and the New Man (the “Family-Oriented New Lad” and the “Emotionally Inarticulate New Man”), I show that these terms remain useful, but also need revision to capture the intricate struggle between inexpressiveness and emotionality characterizing present-day U.S. dramas.
BeynonJ. (2002). Masculinities and culture. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
4.
BonnerF. (2002). Magazines. In CunninghamS.TurnerG. (Eds.), The media and communications in Australia (pp. 193-208). Crows Nest, New South Wales, Australia: Allen & Unwin.
5.
BrodH. (Ed.). (1987). The making of masculinities: The new men’s studies. Boston, MA: Allen & Unwin.
6.
BrodH. (1994). Some thoughts on some histories of some masculinities: Jews and other others. In BrodH.KaufmanM. (Eds.), Theorizing masculinities (pp. 82-96). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
7.
ChengC. (1999). Marginalized masculinities and hegemonic masculinity: An introduction. The Journal of Men’s Studies, 7, 295-315.
8.
CherlinA. J. (2009). The marriage-go-round: The state of marriage and the family in America today. New York, NY: Vintage Books.
9.
ClareA. (2000). On men: Masculinity in crisis. London, England: Arrow Books.
10.
ConnellR. W. (1987). Gender and power. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
11.
ConnellR. W.MesserschmidtJ. W. (2005). Hegemonic masculinity: Rethinking the concept. Gender & Society, 19, 829-859.
12.
CromptonR. (1999). The decline of the male Breadwinner: Explanations and interpretations. In CromptonR. (Ed.), Restructuring gender relations and employment: The decline of the male Breadwinner (pp. 1-25). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
DuerringerC. (2015). Be a man—Buy a car! Articulating masculinity with consumerism in Man’s Last Stand. Southern Communication Journal, 80, 137-152.
15.
DworkinA. (1981). Pornography: Men possessing women. New York, NY: Perigee.
16.
EdleyN.WetherellM. (1996). Masculinity, power and identity. In Mac an GhaillM. (Ed.), Understanding masculinities: Social relations and cultural arenas (pp. 97-113). Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
17.
FaircloughN. (2013). Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language. Oxford, UK: Routledge.
18.
FoucaultM. (1972). The archaeology of knowledge. New York, NY: Pantheon Books. (Original work published 1969)
19.
GillR. (2003). Power and the production of subjects: A genealogy of the New Man and the New Lad. In BenwellB. (Ed.), Masculinity and men’s lifestyle magazines (pp. 43-45). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
20.
GramsciA. (1971). Selections from the prison notebooks. London, England: Lawrence & Wishart.
21.
HatfieldE. F. (2010). “What it means to be a man”: Examining hegemonic masculinity in Two and a Half Men. Communication, Culture & Critique, 3, 526-548.
22.
HoltD. B.ThompsonC. J. (2004). Man-of-action heroes: The pursuit of heroic masculinity in everyday consumption. Journal of Consumer Research, 31, 425-440.
23.
KimmelM. S. (Ed.). (1987). Changing men: New directions in research on men and masculinity. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE.
24.
KimmelM. S. (2017). Manhood in America (4th ed.). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
25.
LevantR. F. (1995). Masculinity reconstructed: Changing the rules of manhood - at work, in relationships and in family life. New York, NY: Penguin Books.
26.
LotzA. D. (2014). Cable guys: Television and masculinities in the 21st century. New York: New York University Press.
27.
MackinnonC. (1989). Towards a feminist theory of the state. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
28.
MartinoW. (2001). “Powerful people aren’t usually real kind, friendly, open people!” Boys interrogating masculinities at school. In MartinoW.MeyennB. (Eds.), What about the boys? Issues of masculinity in schools (pp. 82-95). Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
29.
MilestoneK.MeyerA. (2012). Gender & popular culture. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
30.
NijjarJ. S. (2015). “Menacing youth” and “broken families”: A critical discourse analysis of the reporting of the 2011 English riots in the Daily Express using moral panic theory. Sociological Research Online, 20(4), 1-12. doi:10.5153/sro.3793
31.
OranskyM.MarecekJ. (2009). “I‘m not going to be a girl”: Masculinity and emotions in boys’ friendships and peer groups. Journal of Adolescent Research, 24, 218-241.
32.
PeelM.CaineB.TwomeyC. (2007). Masculinity, emotion and subjectivity: Introduction. The Journal of Men’s Studies, 15, 247-250.
33.
RicciardelliR.ClowK. A.WhiteP. (2010). Investigating hegemonic masculinity: Portrayals of masculinity in men’s lifestyle magazines. Sex Roles, 63, 64-78.
34.
RichardsonJ. E. (2007). Analysing newspapers: An approach from critical discourse analysis. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
35.
RubinL. B. (1983). Intimate strangers. New York, NY: Harper & Row.
36.
SealeC.TonkissF. (2018). Content and text analysis. In SealeC. (Ed.), Researching society and culture (4th ed., pp. 403-428). London, England: SAGE.
37.
SeidlerV. J. (1989). Rediscovering masculinity: Reason, language and sexuality. London, England: Routledge.
38.
ShieldsS. A. (2002). Speaking from the heart: Gender and the social meaning of emotion. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
39.
ShugartH. (2008). Managing masculinities: The metrosexual moment. Communication and Critical/Cultural Studies, 5, 280-300.
40.
SmithA. M. (1994). New Right discourse on race and sexuality: Britain, 1968–1990. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
41.
SongG.LeeT. K. (2012). “New Man” and “New Lad” with Chinese characteristics? Cosmopolitanism, cultural hybridity and men’s lifestyle magazines in China. Asian Studies Review, 36, 345-367.
42.
SouthwellT. (1998). Getting away with it: The inside story of Loaded. London, England: Ebury Press.
43.
TannenD. (1990). You just don’t understand: Women and men in conversation. New York, NY: Morrow.
44.
TaylorL. D. (2005). All for him: Articles about sex in American lad magazines. Sex Roles, 52, 153-163.
45.
VaageM. B. (2016). The antihero in American television. New York, NY: Routledge.
