“The Purity of His Maleness: Masculinity in Popular Romance Novels” seeks to open a discussion between critical studies of men and masculinities and popular romance studies. The phrase “purity of his maleness” is taken from Janice Radway’s groundbreaking study of the popular romance novel, and from this vantage, the article considers how critical studies of men and masculinities might think about, respond to, and engage popular romance novels and scholarship.
AllanJ. A. (2012). Theorising the monstrous and the virginal in popular romance novels. In AllanJ. A.NelsonE. (Eds.), Inversions of power and paradox: Studies of monstrosity (pp. 67-76). Oxford, UK: Inter-Disciplinary Press.
BaxterK. (2000). Desire and the literary machine: Capitalism, male sexuality, and stratemeyer series books for boys. Men and Masculinities, 3, 168-186.
5.
BenekeT. (1997). Proving manhood: Reflections on men and sexism. Berkeley: University of California Press.
6.
BrowningD. (1989). Beginner’s luck. New York, NY: Silhouette Books.
7.
BuchbinderD. (2004). Object or ground? The male body as fashion accessory. Canadian Review of American Studies, 34, 221-231.
8.
CarriganT.BobC.JohnL. (1987). Toward a new sociology of masculinity. In BrodH. (Ed.), The making of masculinities: The new men’s studies (pp. 63-100). Boston, MA: Unwin Hyman.
9.
CliffordK. (1987). Dream of love. Toronto, Ontario, Canada: Harlequin Books.
10.
CohnJ. (1988). Romance and the erotics of property: Mass-market fiction for women. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
11.
ConnellR. W. (2005). Masculinities (2nd ed.). Berkeley: University of California Press.
12.
DigbyT. (2014). Love and war: How militarism shapes sexuality and romance. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
13.
DrummondM. (2011). Reflections on the archetypal heterosexual male body. Australian Feminist Studies, 26, 103-117.
14.
EdelmanL. (2004). No future: Queer theory and the death drive. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
15.
FrantzS. S. G.RennhakK. (2010). Female novelists and their male characters, 1750-2000: An introduction. In FrantzS. S. G.RennhakK. (Eds.), Women constructing men: Female novelists and their male characters, 1750–2000 (pp. 1-10). Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.
16.
GillR.HenwoodK.McLeanC. (2003). A genealogical approach to idealized male body imagery. Paragraph26(1-2), 187-197.
17.
GoffmanE. (1963). Stigma: Notes on the management of spoiled identity. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.
KambléJ. (2014). Making meaning in popular romance fiction: An epistemology. New York, NY: Palgrave MacMillan.
22.
KimmelM. S. (1994). Masculinity as homophobia: Fear, shame and silence in the construction of gender identity. In BrodH.KaufmanM. (Eds.), Research on Men and Masculinities Series: Theorizing masculinities (pp. 119-141). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
23.
KrentzJ. A. (1992). Trying to tame the romance: Critics and correctness. In KrentzJ. A. (Ed.), Dangerous men and adventurous women: Romance writers on the appeal of romance (pp. 107-114). Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
24.
LarabeeA. (2014). Editorial: Reading the Romance at thirty. The Journal of Popular Culture, 47, 1075-1076.
MavorC. (2008). Reading boyishly: Roland Barthes, JM Barrie, Jacques Henri Lartigue, Marcel Proust, and DW Winnicott. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
NeelsB. (1986). The secret pool. Toronto, Ontario, Canada: Harlequin Books.
36.
RadwayJ. (1991). Reading the Romance: Women, patriarchy, and popular literature. Chapel Hill: The University of North Carolina Press. (Original work published 1984)
37.
RegisP. (2003). A natural history of the romance novel. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
SelingerE. M. (2012). How to read a romance novel (and fall in love with popular romance). In FrantzS. S. G.SelingerE. M. (Eds.), New approaches to popular romance fiction: Critical essays (pp. 33-46). Jefferson, NC: McFarland Press.
WeberB. R. (2006). What makes the man? Television makeovers, made-over masculinity, and male body image. International Journal of Men’s Health, 5, 287-306.
47.
WendellS. (2012). “You call me a bitch like that’s a bad thing”: Romance criticism and redefining the word “bitch.” In FrantzS. S. G.SelingerE. M. (Eds.), New approaches to popular romance fiction: Critical essays (pp. 178-194). Jefferson, NC: McFarland Press.
48.
WoodH. (2004). What Reading the Romance did for us. European Journal of Cultural Studies, 17, 147-154.
49.
WoodiwissK. E. (1972). The flame and the flower. New York, NY: Avon Books.
