ReimerKALoweJERasmussenMMJenningsRB. The wavefront phenomenon of ischemic cell death. 1. Myocardial infarct size vs. duration of coronary occlusion in dogs. Circulation1977; 56: 786–94.
PrzylklenkKKlonerRA. Superoxide dismutase plus catalase improve contractile function in the canine model of the “stunned myocardium.” Circ Res1986; 58: 148–56.
5.
MyersMLBolliRLekichRFHartleyCJRobertsR. Enhancement of recovery of myocardial function by oxygen free radical scavengers after reversible regional ischemia. Circulation1985; 72: 915–21.
6.
MyersMLBolliRLekichRFHartleyCJRobertsR. N-2-mercaptopropionylglycine improves recovery of myocardial function after reversible regional ischemia. J Am Coll Cardiol1986; 8: 1161–8.
7.
JeremyRWAllmanKCBautovitchGHarrisPJ. Patterns of left ventricular dilation during six months after myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol1989; 13: 304–10.
8.
HutchinsGMBulkleyBH. Infarct expansion versus extension: Two different complications of acute myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol1978; 41: 1127–32.
9.
EatonLWWeissJLBulkleyBHGarrisonJBWeisfeldtML. Regional cardiac dilatation after acute myocardial infarction: Recognition by two-dimensional echocardiography. N Engl J Med1979; 300: 57–62.
10.
McKayRGPfefferMAPasternakRCMarkisJEComePCNakaoS. Left ventricular remodeling after myocardial infarction: A corollary to infarct expansion. Circulation1986; 74: 693–702.
11.
GaudronPJEillesCErtlG. Subacute adaptation to loss of contractile myocardium by left ventricular dilatation (remodeling) in patients with myocardial infarction (abstract). Circulation1987; 76 (suppl IV):402.
12.
PfefferMAPfefferJM. Ventricular enlargement and reduced survival after myocardial infarction. Circulation1987; 75 (suppl IV):93–7.
13.
KannelWBSorliePMcNamaraPM. Prognosis after initial myocardial infarction: The Framingham Study. Am J Cardiol1979; 44: 53–9.
14.
WhiteHDNorrisRMBrownMABrandtPWTWhitlockRMCWildCJ. Left ventricular end systolic volume as the major determinant of survival after recovery from myocardial infarction. Circulation1987; 76: 44–51.
15.
WestlinWMullaneK. Does captopril attenuate reperfusion-induced myocardial dysfunction by scavenging free radicals? Circulation1988; 77 (suppl I): 30–9.
16.
PfefferMALamasGAVaughanDEParisiAFBraunwaldE. Effect of captopril on progressive ventricular dilatation after anterior myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med1988; 319: 80–6.
17.
RubinSA. Effect of captopril on ventricular dilatation after anterior myocardial infarction (letter). N Engl J Med1988; 319: 1736.
18.
FishbeinMCLeiLQRubinSA. Long-term propranolol administration alters myocyte and ventricular geometry in rat hearts with and without infarction. Circulation1988; 78: 369–75.
19.
BlackI. Effect of captopril on ventricular dilatation after anterior myocardial infarction (letter). N Engl J Med1988; 319: 1736.
20.
PfefferMALamasGBraunwaldE. Effect of captopril on ventricular dilatation after anterior myocardial infarction (letter). N Engl J Med1988; 319: 1736.
21.
SharpeNMurphyJSmithHHannanS. Preventive treatment of asymptomatic left ventricular dysfunction following myocardial infarction. Eur Heart J1990; 11 (suppl B):147–56.
22.
SharpeNSmithHMurphyJGreavesSHartHGambleG. Early prevention of left ventricular dysfunction after myocardial infarction with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition. Lancet1991; 337: 872–6.
23.
NabelEGTopolEJGaleanaAEllisSGBatesERWernsSW. A randomized placebo-controlled trial of combined early intravenous captopril and recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator therapy in acute myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol1991; 17: 467–73.
24.
PfefferMAMoyeLABraunwaldEBastaLBrownEJCuddyTE. Selection bias in the use of thrombolytic therapy in acute myocardial infarction. JAMA1991; 266: 528–32.
25.
MurrayBE. The life and times of the EnterococcusClin Microbiol Rev1990; 3: 46–65.
26.
GrayJWStewartDPedlerSJ. Species identification and antibiotic susceptibility testing of enterococci isolated from hospitalized patients. Antimicrob Agents Chemother1991; 35: 1943–5.
27.
LeclercqRDerlotEDuvalJCourvalinP. Plasmid-mediated resistance to vancomycin and teicoplanin in Enterococcus faeciumN Engl J Med1988; 319: 157–61.
28.
SahmDFKissingerJGilmoreMSMurrayPRMulderRSollidayJ. In vitro susceptibility studies of vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecalisAntimicrob Agents Chemother1989; 33: 1588–91.
KimMJWeiserMGottschallSRandallEL. Identification of Streptococcus faecalis and Streptococcus faecium and susceptibility studies with newly developed antimicrobial agents. J Clin Microbiol1987; 25: 787–90.
31.
PerezJLRieraLVallsFBerrocalCIBerrocalL. A comparison of the in-vitro activity of seventeen antibiotics against Streptococcus faecalisJ Antimicrob Chemother1987; 20: 357–62.
32.
Vance-BryanKGuayDRPRotschaferJC. Clinical pharmacokinetics of ciprofloxacin. Clin Pharmacokinet1990; 19: 434–61.
33.
SahmDFKoburovGT. In vitro activity of quinolones against enterococci resistant to penicillin—aminoglycoside synergy. Antimicrob Agents Chemother1989; 33: 71–7.
34.
Fernandez-GuerreroMRouseMSHenryNKGeraciJEWilsonWR. In vitro and in vivo activity of ciprofloxacin against enterococci isolated from patients with infective endocarditis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother1987; 31: 430–3.
35.
SmithSMEngRHK. Interaction of ciprofloxacin with ampicillin and vancomycin for Streptococcus faecalisDiagn Microbiol Infect Dis1988; 9: 239–43.
36.
SandersWEJr. Efficacy, safety, and potential economic benefits of oral ciprofloxacin in the treatment of infections. Rev Infect Dis1988; 10: 528–43.
37.
ChrysanthopoulosCJStarakisJCSkoutelisATBassarisHP. Brief report: Sequential intravenous/oral therapy with ciprofloxacin in severe infection. Am J Med1989; 87 (suppl 5A):S225–7.
38.
EronLJHarveyLHixonDLPoretzDM. Ciprofloxacin therapy of infections caused by Pseudomonas aeruginosa and other resistant bacteria. Antimicrob Agents Chemother1985; 27: 308–10.
39.
PeacockJEJrPegramPSWeberSFLeonePA. Prospective, randomized comparison of sequential intravenous followed by oral ciprofloxacin with intravenous ceftazidime in the treatment of serious infections. Am J Med1989; 87 (suppl 5A):S185–90.
40.
PowersTBinghamDH. Clinical and economic effect of ciprofloxacin as an alternative to injectable antimicrobial therapy. Am J Hosp Pharm1990; 47: 1781–4.
41.
RappRPBilleterMHattonJYoungABTibbsPADempseyRJ. Intravenous ciprofloxacin versus ceftazidime for treatment of nosocomial pneumonia and urinary tract infection. Clin Pharm1991; 10: 49–55.
42.
EronLJ. Therapy of skin and skin structure infections with ciprofloxacin: An overview. Am J Med1987; 82 (suppl 4A):S224–6.
43.
GentryLORodriguez-GomezG. Ofloxacin versus parenteral therapy for chronic osteomyelitis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother1991; 35: 538–41.
44.
ScullyBENeuHC. Oral ciprofloxacin therapy of infection caused by multiply resistant bacteria other than Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J Antimicrob Chemother1986; 18 (suppl D): 179–85.
45.
Swedish Study Group. Therapy of acute and chronic gram-negative osteomyelitis with ciprofloxacin. J Antimicrob Chemother1988; 22: 221–8.
46.
ZervosMJBaconAEPattersonJESchabergDRKauffmanCA. Enterococcal superinfection in patients treated with ciprofloxacin. J Antimicrob Chemother1988; 21: 113–5.
47.
KhanFABasirR. Sequential intravenous-oral administration of ciprofloxacin vs ceftazidime in serious bacterial respiratory tract infections. Chest1989; 96: 528–37.
48.
BrownJRBeebeGWKurtzkeJFLoewensonRBSilberbergDHTourtelloteWW. The design of clinical studies to assess therapeutic efficacy in multiple sclerosis. Neurology1979; 29: 3–23.
49.
WaxmanSG. Current concepts in neurology: Membranes, myelin and the pathophysiology of multiple sclerosis. N Engl J Med1982; 306: 1529–32.
50.
KurtzkeJF. Epidemiologic contributions to multiple sclerosis: An overview. Neurology (NY)1980; 30: 61–79.
51.
McFarlinDEMcFarlandHF. Multiple sclerosis: Part I. N Engl J Med1982; 307: 1183–8.
52.
McAlpineDLumsdenCEAchesonED. Multiple sclerosis: a reappraisal. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone, 1972.
53.
McFarlinDEMcFarlandHF. Multiple sclerosis: Part II. N Engl J Med1982; 307: 1246–51.
54.
QuickDCWaxmanSG. Specific staining of the axon membrane at nodes of Ranvier with ferric ion and ferrocyanide. J Neurol Sci1977; 31: 1–11.
55.
WaxmanSGQuickDC. Cytochemical differentiation of the axon membrane and A and C fibers. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry1977; 40: 379–85.
56.
TasakiI. Conduction of the nerve impulse. In: FieldJ ed. Neurophysiology: Handbook of physiology, section 1. Washington, DC: American Physiological Society, 1959: 75–121.
57.
ChiuSYRitchieJMRobartRBStaggD. A quantitative description of membrane currents in rabbit myelinated nerve. J Physiol (Lond)1979; 292: 149–66.
58.
BrismarT. Potential clamp analysis of membrane currents in rat myelinated nerve fibers. J Physiol (Lond)1980; 298: 171–84.
59.
RitchieJMShiuSY. Distribution of sodium and potassium channels in mammalian myelinated nerve. In: WaxmanSGRitchieJM eds. Demyelinating disease: Basic and clinical electrophysiology. New York: Raven Press, 1981: 329–42.
60.
KajiRSumnerAJ. Effect of digitalis on central demyelinated conduction block in vivo. Ann Neurol1989; 25: 1364–8.
61.
KajiRSumnerAJ. Ouabain reverses conduction disturbances in single demyelinated nerve fibers. Neurology1989; 39: 1364–8.
62.
KajiRHappelLSumnerAJ. Effect of digitalis on clinical symptoms and conduction variable in patients with multiple sclerosis. Ann Neurol1990; 28: 582–4.
63.
GaranHSmithTWPowellWJJr. The central nervous system as a site of action for the coronary vasoconstrictor effect of digoxin. J Clin Invest1974; 54: I365–72.