Use of large-volume electronic infusion devices (EID) in an adult general hospital was compared with an established protocol to determine compliance. Data were collected during seven widely spaced inspections of the facility. Forty-six percent of 962 EID were observed to be employed inappropriately. Compliance was nearly identical for both pumps and controllers and for intensive care and non-intensive care areas. Four reasons for employing EID accounted for 48 percent of all inappropriate use. An estimated annual savings of $178 000 to $460 000 might be realized through strict protocol compliance.
Trends in drug and fluid delivery.Biomed Business Int1986; 9:4–7.
2.
BivinsBARappRPPowersPButlerJLHaackD.Electronic flow control and roller clamp control in intravenous therapy.Arch Surg1980; 115: 70–2.
3.
RappRPBivinsBMckeanHEPowersPButlerJL.Effects of electronic infusion control on the efficacy, complications, and cost of iv therapy.Hosp Form1979; 14: 975–82.
4.
HoffmannDMAttilioRMBraunDWOberstMTSternNB.A randomized study of the IVAC 230 infusion controller in a comprehensive cancer center.Am J IV Ther Clin Nutr1981; 8: 16–8.
5.
AlexanderMR.IV infusion devices: are they always justified?Drug Intell Clin Pharm1987; 21: 255–7.
