Abstract
The pharmacy and therapeutics committee-based clinical evaluation can be a useful tool in the economic and functional effectiveness of a restrictive formulary system. We utilized this concept to evaluate a generic formulation of procainamide hydrochloride (PA) for admission to our formularies. The study performed was a randomized, singleblind, crossover comparison of the serum-concentration profiles of two preparations (Squibb vs. Ascot) of conventional-release PA. Ten outpatients requiring chronic PA therapy for the control of ventricular dysrhythmias were evaluated. The resultant dose- adjusted data showed no significant difference between mean serum PA concentrations at any sample time, area under the serum concentration-time curves, mean peak serum PA concentrations achieved, or peak-trough fluctuations. Relative bioavailability was calculated to be 0.972 ±0.59. The Ascot preparation demonstrated a delay of 15 minutes before the onset of absorption; however, it also showed an earlier tmax in comparison to the Squibb formulation. Generic substitution of Ascot PA in place of Squibb PA may be implemented with significant cost savings.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.