For over 30 years, the content and form of the pharmacy curriculum and the title of the degree to be awarded have been subjects of controversy among pharmacy educators and practitioners. Scores of articles have been written about a universal Pharm.D. degree, all of which present different angles and opinions. Those who favor a universal Pharm.D. desire an improved image for the profession, greater employment opportunities, preparation for future pharmacy roles, the elimination of the multi-tiered structure, and decreasing costs for services. Those who oppose the entry-level Pharm.D. degree stress a need for multiple levels of education to meet the varying demands of practice, emphasize the oversaturation of the job market and increased costs to schools to adopt the new curriculum, and protest bestowing a doctoral title for reasons of self-esteem. The authors of this article consider it timely to present and evaluate these arguments, to provide the reader with a comprehensive review of the debate, and to call for unity within the profession as it considers the future educational needs of pharmacy practitioners.
ElliottEC. The general report of the pharmaceutical survey, 1946–49. Washington, DC: American Council on Education, 1950.
2.
Proceedings of the Twenty-Ninth Annual Convention of the National Association of Boards of Pharmacy. Toronto, 1932.
3.
RodowskasCAJrA matter of degrees. Drug Intell Clin Pharm1982; 16: 607–12.
4.
ChartersWWLemonABMonellLM. Basic material for a pharmaceutical curriculum. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1927.
5.
HaskellAR. Should profession adopt doctoral degree for all?Am Drug1976; 174: 41, 57.
6.
BrodieDC. Pharmaceutical education in perspective. Am J Pharm Educ1982; 46: 274–80.
7.
HaskellARBenedictLK. The universal doctor of pharmacy degree. Am J Pharm Educ1975; 39: 425–7.
8.
Institutional paper submitted to the AACP by University of Connecticut, 1977. In: ProvostGP, ed. A single, professional doctoral degree in pharmacy? J Am Pharm Assoc1977; NS17: 403.
9.
BenedictLKPiephoRKimberlinC. Development of the Pharm.D. program at the University of Nebraska. Am J Pharm Educ1978; 42: 292–5.
10.
MasakiBW. Reevaluation and revision of the six-year program. Am J Pharm Educ1970; 34: 63–8.
11.
WeaverLC. A look to the future. Am Pharm1980; NS20: 24–6.
12.
BilesJA. For what reason?Apothecary1981; 93: 7–8.
13.
LembergerAP. Tomorrow's pharmacist—‘doctor’ or ‘mister’?Il Pharm1976; 40: 6–9.
14.
SchumacherF. The new pharmacology: More than pills and pantyhose. Change1977; 9: 16–17.
15.
SwintoskyJVHopkinsHVogtDD. The professional degree in pharmacy reexamined. J Am Pharm Assoc1975; NS15: 683, 707.
16.
FineJL. Presented at open hearing held by task force on education at APhA 129th annual meeting, Las Vegas, 1982. In: KushnerD, ed. Too many schools? 4-year course? Task force on education is asked to consider some radical ideas. Am Drug1982; 185: 18–24.
17.
Presented by APhA before AACP open hearing, Kansas City, 1978. In: GibbsRG, ed. Pharm.D. Where does our profession stand? la Pharm1978; 33: 6–9.
18.
CumbieC. Specialization in nursing or tic tac toe. J Am Pharm Assoc1974; NS14: 617.
19.
WesolowskiT. President's viewpoint (editorial). Il Pharm1982; 44: 7.
20.
RayM. In support of one degree for pharmacy. Am J Hosp Pharm1977; 34: 579–80.
21.
FranckeDE. Two degree system maintained (editorial). Drug Intell Clin Pharm1978; 12: 486.
22.
BakerEW. Overcoming the barriers that prevent community pharmacists from maximizing their contributions to health care. Am J Pharm Educ1979; 43: 359–61.
23.
O'HaraGLKirkKWSperandioGJ. Perceived benefits of the Pharm.D. as a second pharmacy degree. Am J Hosp Pharm1978; 35: 423–5.
24.
Accreditation manual, 7th ed., 2nd printing. Chicago: The American Council on Pharmaceutical Education, 1979.
25.
KushnerD. Every new pharmacist a ‘doctor of pharmacy’? It may happen sooner than you think. Am Drug1980; 181: 13, 83, 97.
26.
MillerWA. Number of degree programs in pharmaceutical education. Drug Intell Clin Pharm1977; 11: 177–8.
27.
KnappDA. A case for two professional degree programs in pharmacy. Drug Intell Clin Pharm1976; 10: 330–2.
28.
SchwartzMA. B.S. and Pharm.D.—one or two degrees?Drug Intell Clin Pharm1975; 9: 569–70.
29.
WalgreenCRIIIPresented at open hearing held by task force on education at APhA 129th annual meeting, Las Vegas, 1982. In: KushnerD, ed. Too many schools? 4-year course? Task force on education is asked to consider some radical ideas. Am Drug1982; 185: 18–24.
30.
WaltonCADoluisioJT. Commitments for tomorrow in pharmacy education: Two professional degree programs. Am J Pharm Educ1975; 39: 418–24.
31.
LaFrancoMMTannenbaumRPCannonML. Point/counterpoint—a rebuttal to the universal Pharm.D. proposal. Drug Intell Clin Pharm1977; 11: 477–9.
32.
MillerRR. In support of two degrees for pharmacy (letter). Am J Hosp Pharm1977; 34: 1176.
33.
SmithHA. Which degree to decree: That is not the question (letter). J Am Pharm Assoc1977; NS17: 333.
34.
DoluisioJT. B.S. vs. Pharm.D. debate. Apothecary1981; 93: 6–7.
35.
PolackAE. Some perspectives on US pharmacy. Drug Intell Clin Pharm1979; 13: 209–11.
36.
McCormickEM. How retail pharmacists vote on degrees in pharmacy. Pharm Times1978; 44: 72–8.
37.
KnappDA. Argument for multiple degrees. The case for multiple degree programs in pharmacy. Contemp Pharm Pract1980; 3: 64–7.
38.
FranckeDEWhitneyHAKJrThe five-year Pharm.D. Drug Intell Clin Pharm1975; 9: 384–5.
39.
KushnerD. B.S.-holders' desire for Pharm.D. produces liveliest session of week (editorial). Am Drug1980; 181: 66–70.
LaPianaLJ. Retail pharmacists disagree on which degree they prefer in pharmacy. Pharm Times1981; 47: 29–35.
42.
EvansJE. The universal Pharm.D. degree. Am J Hosp Pharm1977; 34: 1296, 1302.
43.
DoluisioJT. Presented at the annual Pharmaceutical Conference of the National Association of Chain Drug Stores, Denver. In: Pharmacy educator assails the Pharm.D.-for-all concept. Am Drug1980; 182: 64, 92.
44.
PhaffH. One degree for pharmacy? (letter). Am J Hosp Pharm1977; 34: 912.
45.
KushnerD. Pharmacy education's ‘growth products’: Pharm.D. and technician programs (editorial). Am Drug1980; 181: 3, 32.
46.
CipolleRJCloydJCMcCoyHGPepinSMRotschaferJCZaskeDE. Pharm.D. for all—who will provide the necessary resources?Drug Intell Clin Pharm1978; 12: 424–5.
47.
HansonAL. External degree: Mechanism for B.S. practitioners to earn a Pharm.D. Am J Pharm Educ1981; 45: 284–90.
48.
BurtonBE. To move a profession. Il Pharm1982; 44: 18–20.
49.
ClarkDA. PD now … the time has come. Am Pharm1981; NS21: 8–12.
50.
DayRL. Once upon a PD. Am Pharm1981; NS21: 8–12.
51.
BrodieDCKnobenJEWertheimerAI. Expanded roles for pharmacists. Am J Pharm Educ1973; 37: 591–600.
52.
DoluisioJT. Presented at open hearing held by task force on education at APhA 129th annual meeting, Las Vegas, 1982. In: KushnerD, ed. Too many schools? 4-year course? Task force on education is asked to consider some radical ideas. Am Drug1982; 185: 18–24.
