Virginia Bill of Rights, Section 12. Adopted June 12, 1776.
2.
Proposed rule; prescription drug products: Patient labeling requirements. Federal Register1979; 44: 40016. Correction: 51242.
3.
Federal Register1979; 44: 40017.
4.
Federal Register1979; 44: 40018.
5.
Federal Register1979; 44: 40025.
6.
Federal Register1979; 44: 40030. See also, Code of Federal Regulations §10.40.
7.
DworkinFReinschSMooreS.Draft regulatory analysis: Patient labeling requirements for prescription drug products. FDA, June, 1979: 2.
8.
Federal Register1979; 44: 37434.
9.
Federal Register1979; 44: 40033.
10.
Federal Register1979; 44: 40032.
11.
OwenJ.Statement to FDA at hearing. September, 1979: 8.
12.
Federal Register1979; 44: 58918.
13.
Federal Register1979; 44: 40027.
14.
Federal Register1979; 44: 40031.
15.
Letter to RichardM. Cooper, FDA, Chief Counsel, from A.S. Transeau, Naval Legal Services Officer, Guam, March 8, 1979. Letter to A.S. Transeau from Richard M. Cooper, June 4, 1979 (Freedom of Information Request F80–2000).
16.
WellingtonH.On freedom of expression. Tale Law J1979; 88: 1105.
17.
SwindlerWF, Court and constitution in the 20th century; the new legality, 1932–1968. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill, 1970.
18.
Justice Black and First Amendment“absolutes”, a public interview. NYU Law Rev1962; 37: 549–53.
19.
HinchleyJW, The First Amendment and the delivery of legal services. ABA J1977; 63: 945–6.
20.
WormuthFB, The doctrine of reasonable alternative. Utah Law Rev1964; 9: 254–301.
21.
StoneGR, Restrictions of speech because of its content: The peculiar case of subject matter restriction. U Chi Law Rev1978; 46: 81–115.
22.
MonaghanHP, First Amendment “due process.”Harv Law Rev1970; 83: 518.
23.
BakerWR, Do lawyers have a First Amendment right to solicit?ABA J1978; 64: 364–70.
24.
In the matter of Edna Smith (primus), 436 U.S. 412, 431 (1978).
25.
Griswold v. Connecticut, 381 U.S. 479, 481–482 (1964).
26.
Roe v. Wade, 410 U.S. 113, 153 (1973). See also, Doe v. Bolton, 410 U.S. 179 (1973).
27.
Paul v. Davis, 424 U.S. 693 (1976); Falko v. Connecticut, 302 U.S. 319, 325 (1937); PMA v. FDA, DC Del., Civil No. 77–291, February, 1980; original opinion, p. 21.
28.
California v. Privitera, 152 Cal. Reptr. 431, 438 (1979). See also, Rutherford v. U.S., 582 F.2d 1234 (10th Cir. 1978).
29.
PMA v. FDA, p. 23.
30.
95 S. Ct. 2222, at 2234.
31.
ElmanP.The new constitutional right to advertise. ABA J1978; 64: 207, 209–10.
32.
Warner-Lambert Company v. FTC, 561 F.2d 357 (DC Cir. 1977).
33.
Beneficial Corporation v. FTC, 542 F.2d 611 (3rd Cir. 1976).
34.
National Commission on Egg Nutrition v. FTC, 570 F.2d 157 (7th Cir. 1977).
35.
Chrysler Corporation v. FTC, 561 F.2d 357 (DC Cir. 1977).
36.
Metpath, Inc. v. Imperato, 450 F. Supp. 115, 117, 118 (1978).
37.
PMA v. FDA, pp 21, 22, 24.
38.
DowlingNP, Cases on constitutional law. 6th ed. Brooklyn: Foundation Press, 1959.
39.
431 U.S. 85, 94, 95, (1976).
40.
BowenCD, Miracle at Philadelphia: The story of the Constitutional Convention, May-September 1787. Atlantic Monthly1966; 218 (Nov): 94–103.
41.
ReardonJJ, Edmund Randolph: A biography. “The farmer who stood apart, May-September 1787.”New York: Macmillan, 1974.
42.
SchwartzRL, Laetrile: The battle moves into the courtroom. ABA J1979: 65: 224–6.
43.
Bantam Books v. Sullivan, 372 U.S. 58, 70 (1963).
44.
Bates v. State Bar of Arizona, 555 P.2d 640 (1976).
45.
Bates v. State Bar of Arizona, 433 U.S. 350 (1977).
46.
Cantor v. Detroit Edison Co., 428 U.S. 579, 96 S.Ct. 3113, 3110 (1976).
47.
Capitol Broadcasting Co. v. Mitchell, 333 F. Supp. 582 (D.D.C. 1971) affirmed 405 U.S. 1000(1972).
48.
Carroll v. President and Commissioners of Princess Anne, 393 U.S. 175 (1968).
49.
Keyishan v. Board of Regents, 385 U.S. 589, 602–603 (1967); and see: Note, constitutional law-freedom of speech. Ind Law Rev 1973; 6: 544, and note, less drastic means and the First Amendment, tale Law J1969; 78: 464.
50.
Kordel v. U.S., 335 U.S. 345, L.Ed. 52 (1948).
51.
Linmark Associates, Inc. v. Willingboro, 431 U.S. 85 (1976).
52.
National Association of Letter Carriers v. U.S. Civil Service Commission, 413 U.S. 548, 598 (1973).
53.
New York Times v. Sullivan, 376 U.S. 254, 266 (1954).
54.
Pittsburgh Press Company v. Pittsburgh Commission on Human Relations, 413 U.S. 376 (1973).
55.
Shelton v. Tucker, 364 U.S. 479,488 (1960).
56.
United States v. An Undetermined Number of Cases … Balanced Foods, Inc., 338 F.2d 157 (2nd. Cir. 1964).
57.
United States v. An Article… Diapulse, 389 F.2d 612 (1968).
58.
United States v. Robel, 389 U.S. 258, 268 (1957).
59.
United States v. Urbeteit, 335 U.S. 355 (1948).
60.
Valentine v. Chrestensen, 316 U.S. 52 (1952): Overturned by Bigelow v. Virginia, 421 U.S. 809 (1975).