GoldbergTMooreWE, Evaluation of impact of drug substitution legislation. JAPA1976; 16: 64–70.
2.
GoldbergT, Impact of drug substitution legislation: A report on the first year's experience. JAPA1977; 17: 216–26.
3.
GoldbergT, Evaluation of economic effects of drug product selection legislation. Presented at the 105th Annual Meeting of the American Public Health Association. Washington, DC, October 31, 1977.
4.
GoldbergT.Cost implications of drug product selection legislation. Presented at the Invitational Dissemination Workshop on the Drug Product Selection Legislation. Gainesville, FL, January 4–5, 1979.
5.
SmithDWAldridgeGW, Probability sampling of prescription order forms. Presented at the 124th Annual Meeting of the American Pharmaceutical Association. New York, May 17, 1977.
6.
ChurchillGAJr.Marketing research: Methodological foundations. Hinsdale, IL: The Dryden Press, 1976.
7.
GreenePETullDA, Research for marketing decisionsx. 8th ed. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1978.
8.
KerlingerFN, Foundations of behavioral research. 2nd ed. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston, 1973.
9.
KishL.Survey sampling. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1956.
10.
LansingJBMorganJN, Economic survey methods. Ann Arbor: Institute for Social Research, 1971.
11.
MilcarekBIStrueningEL, Evaluation methodology: A selective bibliography. In: StrueningELGuttentagM, eds. Handbook of evaluation research. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications, 1975: 667–76.
12.
FinkJL, A study of savings resulting from passage of the Delaware drug product selection act: Final report. Submitted to the Pharmacy Control Officer of the Division of Public Health, State of Delaware. January, 1978.
13.
FinkJLMeyersML, The effectiveness of drug product selection legislation in Delaware. Contemp Pharm Pract1978; 1: 4–8.
14.
HunterRH, Ohio pharmacists and senate bill 45: A preliminary report on a pre-enactment opinion survey. Ohio Pharm1978; (3): 34–5.
15.
StromBLStolleyPDBrownTC, Drug antisubstitution studies I: Estimation of possible savings by repeal of antisubstitution laws. Drugs Health Care1974; 1: 99–103.
16.
StromBLStolleyPDBrownTC, Drug antisubstitution studies II: Evaluation of pharmacists' attitude toward repeal of antisubstitution laws. Drugs Health Care1974; 1: 104–7.
17.
KrbecJTaubmanAH, Effects of the Massachusetts drug substitution law on pharmacists' dispensing habits. Med Market Media1976; 40 (7): 42–5.
18.
VuturoGJ, Drug product selection: The Florida experience. Presented at the Invitational Dissemination Workshop on Drug Product Selection Legislation. Gainesville, FL, January 4–5, 1979.
19.
VuturoGJMcCormickWCKrischerJP, Attitudes of pharmacists and physicians toward Florida's drug product selection law. Presented at the 126th Annual Meeting of the American Pharmaceutical Association. Anaheim, CA, April 21–26, 1979.
20.
FishbeinMA, The search for attitudinal-behavioral consistency. In: CohenJB, ed. Behavioral science foundations of consumer behaviors. New York: The Free Press, 1972: 247–56.
21.
FishbeinMAAjzenI, Formation of beliefs, attitude, intention, and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 1975.
22.
ShethJN, A field study of attitude structure and the attitudinal behavior relationship. In: ShethJN, ed. Models of buyer behavior. New York: Harper and Row, 1974: 242–70.
23.
ShannonMCJacobsEWHeplerCD, The development of an instrument to determine pharmacists' attitudes toward substitution. Presented at the 125th Annual Meeting of the American Pharmaceutical Association. Montreal, Canada, May 17, 1978.
24.
KotzanJABraucherCL, A multivariate analysis of retail prescription prices. J Market Res1970; 8: 517–20.
25.
HaysWL, Statistics; New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston, 1963: 204–5.
26.
FerberR.The reliability of consumer reports of financial assets and debts. Urbana, IL: Bureau of Economics Business Research, University of Illinois, 1966: 266.
27.
KaplanA.The conduct of inquiry: Methodology for behavioral science. San Francisco: Chandler Publishing, 1964.
28.
WeberM.The methodology of the social sciences. Glencoe, IL: Free Press, 1949: 115.