North Dakota State Board of Pharmacy v. Snyder's Drug Stores, Inc., 414 U.S. 156 (1973).
2.
American Pharmaceutical Association v. Matthews, 530 F.2d 1054 (DC Cir. 1976).
3.
Abbott Laboratories et al. v. Portland Retail Druggists Association, Inc., 425 U.S. 1 (1976).
4.
Virginia State Board of Pharmacy, et al. v. Virginia Citizens Consumer Council, Inc., et al., 425 U.S. 748 (1976).
5.
Va. Code Ann. §54–524.35 (1974).
6.
425 U.S. 748, at 756–757 (1976).
7.
425 U.S. 748, at 766–767 (1976).
8.
425 U.S. 748, at 768 (1976).
9.
Virginia State Board of Pharmacy, et al. v. Virginia Citizens Consumer Council, Inc., et al., 96 S.Ct. 1817, at 1831 (1976).
10.
425 U.S. 748, at 775 (1976).
11.
GreenwoodE.: Attributes of a Profession, Social Work2: 45–55 (July) 1957.
12.
BlauchL. E.: The Earmarks of a Profession, Am. J. Pharm. Educ.12: 243–255 (Apr.) 1948.
13.
Bates v. State Bar of Arizona, 97 S.Ct. 2691 (1977).
14.
425 U.S. 748, at 773–774 (1976).
15.
Anon: The Burger Opinion: What Pharmacists Had to Say, J. Am. Pharm. Assoc.16: 492–493 (Sept.) 1976.
16.
GarchaB. S.: Is the Justice Blind? Pharmacists Answer Burger, Drug Topics120: 55–59 (Oct. 15) 1976.
17.
425 U.S. 748, at 785 (1976).
18.
GoodmanL. E.: Rulings from the Bench, J. Am. Pharm. Assoc. NS1: 430–432 (July) 1961.
19.
GoldsteinA. S.: Application of Federal Antitrust Laws to Third-Party Prescription Plans, Am. J. Pharm.148: 86–89 (May-June) 1976.
20.
Northern California Pharmaceutical Association v. United States, 306 F.2d 379 (9th Cir. 1962), cert. denied 371 U.S. 862 (1962).
21.
Anon.: Favorable Decision for the Profession … New Jersey Ethics Case, J. Am. Pharm. Assoc.7: 78–82 (Feb.) 1967.
22.
Supermarkets General Corporation v. Sills, 93 N.J. Super. 326, 255 A.2d 728 (1966).
23.
Patterson Drug Company, et al. v. Kingery., 305 F. Supp. 821 (1969).
24.
425 U.S. 748, at 767 (1976).
25.
QuinneyE. R.: Adjustment to Occupational Role Strain: The Case of Retail Pharmacy, Southwestern Soc. Sci. Q.44: 367–376 (Mar.) 1964.
26.
DenzinN. K.MettlinC. J.: Incomplete Professionalization: The Case of Pharmacy, Social Forces46: 375–381 (Mar.) 1968.
27.
ManasseH. R.Jr.StewartJ. E.HallR. H.: Inconsistent Socialization in Pharmacy — A Pattern in Need of Change, J. Am. Pharm. Assoc.15: 616–621, 658 (Nov.) 1975.
28.
BuerkiR. A.: Pharmacist Smyth and Druggist Smith — A Study in Professional Aspirations, Am. J. Pharm. Educ.41: 28–33 (Feb.) 1977.
29.
McCormackT. H.: The Druggists' Dilemma: Problems of a Marginal Occupation, Am. J. Sociol.61: 308–315 (Jan.) 1956.
30.
Rite Aid of New Jersey v. New Jersey Board of Pharmacy, 124 N.J.Super. 62, 304 A.2d 754 (1973).
31.
Anon.: Three Court Cases Enhance Pharmacy's Stature, New Jersey J. Pharm.46: 10–11 (June) 1973.
32.
GervasiP.: The Community Pharmacist: Health Sentinel on the Home Front, Am. J. Public Health64: 811–812 (Aug.) 1974.
33.
SonnedeckerG.: To Be or Not To Be — Professional, Am. J. Pharm.133: 243–254 (July) 1961.
34.
N.D. Century Code §43-15-35(5) (Supp. 1973).
35.
278 U.S. 105 (1928).
36.
Lincoln Union v. Northwestern Co., 335 U.S. 525, at 536–537 (1948).
37.
414 U.S. 156, at 166 (1973).
38.
Snyder's Drug Stores, Inc. v. North Dakota State Board of Pharmacy, 219 N.W.2d 140, at 151 (1974).
39.
219 N.W.2d 140, at 149 (1974).
40.
Dichter Institute for Motivational Research, Inc.: Communicating the Value of Comprehensive Pharmaceutical Services to the Consumer, American Pharmaceutical Association, Washington, DC, 1973.