Abstract
As the pharmacist's clinical role expands he is confronted with legal questions concerning actual or proposed activities. A number of papers have appeared in the literature of pharmacy which address the potential legal liability of the pharmacist who engages in clinical activity but most are written in terms of general principles of law with few specific circumstances addressed. In this article, legal questions raised by clinical pharmacists in the course of their everyday practices are evaluated and discussed. Among the issues presented are use of an FDA-approved drug for an unapproved use, informed consent in administration of unapproved drugs, the role of the pharmacist in managing hypertensive patients visiting a hospital-based clinic, the legality of a pharmacist administering injectible drugs, the legality of permitting Pharm.D. students to draw blood, and the application of the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act to the preparation of aluminum hydroxide cookies for dialysis patients. The specific questions are answered and the legal standard of care expected of pharmacists performing clinical functions is discussed. While no cases have been decided yet concerning newer clinical activities, some precedent can be found in past cases. Approaches to handling these questions should be of value in addressing future legal issues presented as pharmacists further seek to better utilize their knowledge.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
