Erroneous Computerized Interpretation of QTc and Changes to Patient Drug Therapy: Cautionary Example for Pharmacists

Abstract

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Drew

Ackerman

Funk

, et al. Prevention of torsade de pointes in hospital settings: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association and the American College of Cardiology Foundation. Circulation. 2010;121:1047-1060. doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.192704

Rautaharju

Surawicz

Gettes

, et al. AHA/ACCF/HRS recommendations for the standardization and interpretation of the electrocardiogram, part IV: the ST segment, T and U waves, and the QT interval: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association Electrocardiography and Arrhythmias Committee, Council on Clinical Cardiology; the American College of Cardiology Foundation; and the Heart Rhythm Society. Circulation. 2009;119:e241-e250. doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.19109

Al-Khatib

LaPointe

NMA

Kramer

Califf

RM.

What clinicians should know about the QT interval. JAMA. 2003;289:2120-2127. doi:10.1001/jama.289.16.2120

Schlapfer

Wellens

Computer-interpreted electrocardiograms: benefits and limitations. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017;70:1183-1192. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2017.07.723

Estes

NAM

III . Computerized interpretation of ECGs, supplement not a substitute. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2013;6:2-4. doi:10.1161/CIRCEP.111.000097

Noel

See

Flannery

AH.

Walk the line—the importance of well-informed interpretation of QT prolongation. Ann Pharmacother. 2020;55:123-126. doi:10.1177/1060028020934718

Khatib

Sabir

Omari

Pepper

Tayebjee

MH.

Managing drug-induced QT prolongation in clinical practice. Postgrad Med J. 2021;97:452-458. doi:10.1136/postgradmedj-2020-138661