The Power of Literature Reviews

ANA Ethics Advisory Board. (2025). ANA position statement: The ethical use of artificial intelligence in nursing practice. OJIN: The Online Journal of Issues in Nursing, 30(2). https://doi.org/10.3912/OJIN.Vol30No02PoSCol03

Arksey H. O'Malley L. (2005). Scoping studies: Towards a methodological framework. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 8(1), 19–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/1364557032000119616

Aveyard H. Bradbury-Jones C. (2019). An analysis of current practices in undertaking literature reviews in nursing: Findings from a focused mapping review and synthesis. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 19(1), 105. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-019-0751-7

Cochrane Library. (2000). About Cochrane reviews. Cochrane Library. https://www.cochranelibrary.com/about/about-cochrane-reviews

Cooper C. Booth A. Varley-Campbell J. Britten N. Garside R. (2018). Defining the process to literature searching in systematic reviews: A literature review of guidance and supporting studies. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 18(1), 85. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-018-0545-3

Grant M. J. Booth A. (2009). A typology of reviews: An analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies. Health Information and Libraries Journal, 26(2), 91–108. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-1842.2009.00848.x

Hong Q. N. Pluye P. Fàbregues S. Bartlett G. Boardman F. Cargo M. Vedel I. (2018). Mixed methods appraisal tool (MMAT), version 2018. Education for Information, 34(4), 285–291. https://doi.org/10.3233/EFI-180221

Hou J. Cheng X. Liao J. , Zhang, Z., & Wang, W. (2025). Ethical concerns of AI in healthcare: A systematic review of qualitative studies. Nursing Ethics. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/09697330251385024

JBI. (n.d.). Critical appraisal tools. JBI global. https://jbi.global/critical-appraisal-tools

Johns Hopkins Center for Evidence-Based Practice. (n.d.). Evidence-based practice model and tools. Center for evidence-based practice. https://www.hopkinsmedicine.org/evidence-based-practice/model-tools

Johnson K. H. (2024). Does school nursing benefit from artificial intelligence (AI)? The Journal of School Nursing, 41(1), 3–4. https://doi.org/10.1177/10598405241277456

National Association of School Nurses. (2025). National Association of School Nurses position brief: Use of Artificial Intelligence in school health. The Journal of School Nursing, 41(4), 524–525. https://doi.org/10.1177/10598405251335921

PRISMA. (n.d.). Prisma 2020. https://www.prisma-statement.org/prisma-2020

Rethlefsen M. L. Farrell A. M. Osterhaus Trzasko L. C. Brigham T. J. (2015). Librarian involvement in systematic reviews improves reproducibility and quality of search strategies. Journal of the Medical Library Association, 103(2), 74–80. https://doi.org/10.3163/1536-5050.103.2.003

Shamseer L. Moher D. Maduekwe O. Turner L. Barbour V. Burch R. , Clark, J., Galipeau, J., Roberts, J., & Shea, B. J. (2017). Potential predatory and legitimate biomedical journals: Can you tell the difference? A cross-sectional comparison. BMC Medicine, 15(1), 28. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-017-0785-9

Uttley L. Quintana D. S. Montgomery P. Carroll C. Page M. J. Falzon L. Sutton A. Moher D. (2023). The problems with systematic reviews: A living systematic review. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 156, 30–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2023.01.011

Whittemore R. Knafl K. (2005). The integrative review: Updated methodology. Journal of advanced nursing, 52(5), 546–553. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2005.03621.x

Wieben A. (2025). Overview and summary: Artificial intelligence in nursing and healthcare. OJIN: The Online Journal of Issues in Nursing, 30(2), https://ojin.nursingworld.org/table-of-contents/volume-30-2025/number-2-may-2025/artificial-intelligence-in-nursing-and-healthcare/; https://doi.org/10.3912/OJIN.Vol30No02ManOS