The purpose of this scoping review was to survey the most recent (5 years) acute care, community health, and mental health nursing workload literature to understand themes and research avenues that may be applicable to school nursing workload research. The search for empirical and nonempirical literature was conducted using search engines such as Google Scholar, PubMed, CINAHL, and Medline. Twenty-nine empirical studies and nine nonempirical articles were selected for inclusion. Themes that emerged consistent with school nurse practice include patient classification systems, environmental factors, assistive personnel, missed nursing care, and nurse satisfaction. School nursing is a public health discipline and population studies are an inherent research priority but may overlook workload variables at the clinical level. School nurses need a consistent method of population assessment, as well as evaluation of appropriate use of assistive personnel and school environment factors. Assessment of tasks not directly related to student care and professional development must also be considered in total workload.
AikenL. H.ClarkeS. P.SloaneD. M.SochalskiJ.SilberJ. H. (2002). Hospital nurse staffing and patient mortality, nurse burnout, and job dissatisfaction. Journal of American Medical Association, 288, 1987–1993. Retrieved fromhttps://doi.org/10.1001/jama.288.16.1987
2.
AlghamdiM. G. (2016). Nursing workload: A concept analysis. Journal of Nursing Management, 24, 449–457. Retrieved fromhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jonm.12354
3.
AllenS. B. (2015). The nurse-patient assignment: Purposes and decision factors. Journal of Nursing Administration, 45, 628–635. Retrieved fromhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1097/NNA.0000000000000276
ArskyH.O’MalleyL. (2005). Scoping studies: Towards a methodological framework. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 8, 19–32. Retrieved fromhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1364557032000119616
BaethgeA.MüllerA.RigottiT. (2016). Nursing performance under high workload: A diary study on the moderating role of selection, optimization and compensation strategies. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 72, 545–557. Retrieved fromhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jan.12847
8.
BallJ. E.GriffithsP.RaffertyA. M.LindqvistR.MurrellsT.TishelmanC. (2016). A cross-sectional study of ‘care left undone’ on nursing shifts in hospitals. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 79, 2086–2097. Retrieved fromhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jan.12976
9.
BallJ. E.MurrellsT.RaffertyA. M.MorrowE.GriffithsP. (2013). “Care left undone” during nursing shifts: Associations with workload and perceived quality of care. BMJ Quality & Safety, 23. Retrieved fromhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2012-001767
10.
BerkowS.VonderhaarK.StewartJ.ViirkstisK.TerryA. (2014). Analyzing staffing trade-offs on acute care hospital units. JONA: The Journal of Nursing Administration, 44, 507–516. Retrieved fromhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1097/NNA.0000000000000109
11.
CarayonP.GursesA. (2005). A human factors engineering conceptual framework of nursing workload and patient safety in intensive care units. Intensive and Critical Care Nursing, 21, 284–301. Retrieved fromhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.iccn.2004.12.003
Carmona-MongeF.RodriuezG. R.HerranzC. Q.GomezS. G.Marin-MoralesD. (2013). Evaluation of the nursing workload through the nine equivalents for nursing manpower use scale and the nursing activities score: A prospective correlation study. Intensive & Critical Care Nursing, 29, 228–233. Retrieved fromhttp://dx.doi.org/http://dx.doi.org.proxy.library.umkc.edu/10.1016/j.iccn.2013.03.003
14.
CathroH. (2013). A practical guide to making patient assignments in acute care. The Journal of Nursing Administration, 43, 6–9. Retrieved fromhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1097/NNA.0b013e3182785fff
15.
ChoS. H.KimY. S.YeonK. N.YouS. J.LeeI. D. (2015). Effects of increasing nurse staffing on missed nursing care. International Nursing Review, 62, 267–274. Retrieved fromhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1111/inr.12173
16.
CombeL. G.BachmanM.DolatowskiR.EndsleyP. E.HasseyK.MinchellaL.ZenoE. (2015). School nurse workload: Students are more than just numbers. NASN School Nurse, 30, 283–288.
17.
Daud-GallottiR.CostaS.GuimaraesT.PadilhaK. G.InoueE. N.VasconcelosT. N.…LevinA. S. (2012). Nursing workload as a risk factor for healthcare associated infections in ICU: A Prospective Study. PLoS One, 7. Retrieved fromhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0052342
18.
DuffieldC.DiersD.O’Brien-PallasL.AisbettC.RocheM.KingM.AisbettK. (2011). Nursing staffing, nursing workload, the work environment and patient outcomes. Applied Nursing Research, 24, 244–255. Retrieved fromhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apnr.2009.12.004
19.
DuffieldC.TwiggD. E.PughJ. D.EvansG.DimitrelisS.RocheM. A. (2014). The use of unregulated staff: Time for regulation?Policy, Politics, & Nursing Practice, 15, 42–48. Retrieved fromhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1527154414529337
20.
FagerstromL.VainikainenP. (2014). Nurses experiences of nonpatient factors that affect nursing workload: A study of the PAONCIL instrument. Nursing Research and Practice. Retrieved fromhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/167674
21.
FanneranT.BrimblecombeN.BradleyE.GregoryS. (2015). Using workload measurement tools in diverse care contexts: The experience of staff in mental health and learning disability inpatient settings. Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing, 22, 764–772. Retrieved fromhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jpm.12263
22.
FramN.MorganB. (2012). Ontario: Linking nursing outcomes, workload and staffing decisions in the workplace: The dashboard project. Nursing Leadership, 25, 114–125. Retrieved fromhttp://dx.doi.org/10.12927/cjnl.2012.22801
23.
GarrardJ. (2010). Health sciences literature review made easy: The matrix method (3rd ed.). Sudbury, MA: Jones & Bartlett Learning.
24.
GrafenM.MackenzieF. C. (2015). Development and early application of the Scottish Community Nursing Workload Measurement Tool. British Journal of Community Nursing, 20, 89–92. Retrieved fromhttp://dx.doi.org/10.12968/bjcn.2015.20.2.89
HoldenR. J.ScanlonM. C.PatelN. R.KaushalR.EscotoK.BrownR. L.…KarshB. (2011). A human factors framework and study of the effect of nursing workload on patient safety and employee quality of working life. BMJ Quality & Safety, 20, 15–24. Retrieved fromhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs.2008.028381
27.
JacksonC.LeadbetterT.ManleyK.MartinA.WrightT. (2015). Making the complexity of community nursing visible: The Cassandra Project. British Journal of Community Nursing, 20, 126–133. Retrieved fromhttp://dx.doi.org/10.12968/bjcn.2015.20.3.126
28.
JonesT. L.HamiltonP.MurryN. (2015). Unfinished nursing care, missed care, and implicitly rationed care: State of the science review. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 52, 1121–1137. Retrieved fromhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2015.02.012
29.
JunttilaJ. K.KoivuA.FagerstromL.HaatainenK.NykänenP. (2016). Hospital mortality and optimality of nursing workload: A study on the predictive validity of the RAFAELA nursing intensity and staffing system. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 60, 46–53. Retrieved fromhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2016.03.008
30.
KarshB. T.HoldenR. J.AlperS. J.OrC. K. (2006). A human factors engineering paradigm for patient safety: Designing to support the performance of the healthcare professional. Quality & Safety in Health Care, 15, 59–65. Retrieved fromhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1136/qshc.2005.015974
31.
KohrL. M.HickeyP. A.CurleyM. A. (2012). Building a nursing productivity measure based on the synergy model: First steps. American Journal of Critical Care, 21, 420–431. Retrieved fromhttp://dx.doi.org/10.4037/ajcc2012859
32.
LiuL.LeeS.ChiP.ChiS.YinY. (2012). Exploring the association between nurse workload and nurse-sensitive patient safety outcome indicators. The Journal of Nursing Research, 20, 300–309. Retrieved fromhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1097/jnr.0b013e3182736363
MoherD.LiberatiA.AltmanD. (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analysis: The Prisma statement. PLoS Med, 6. Retrieved fromhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1371journal.pmed1000097
36.
MynyD.BacquerD.HeckeA.BeeckmanD.VeraegheS.GoubergenD. (2014). Validation of standard times and influencing factors during the development of the Workload Indicator for Nursing. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 70, 674–686. Retrieved fromhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jan.12232
37.
MynyD.Van HeckeA.DeBacquerD.VehaegheS.GobertM.DefloorT.VanGoubergenD. (2012). Determining a set of measurable and relevant factors affecting nursing workload in the acute care hospital setting: A cross-sectional study. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 49, 427–436. Retrieved fromhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2011.10.005
38.
National Association of School Nurses. (2015). School nurse workload: Staffing for safe care. NASN School Nurse, 30, 290–293. Retrieved fromhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1942602X15594143
NeillD. (2011). Nursing workload and the changing health care environment: A review of the literature. Administrative Issues Journal, 1, 132–143. Retrieved fromhttp://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1055056
42.
NeillD.DavisG. (2015). Development of a subjective workload assessment for nurses: A human factors approach. Journal of Nursing Measurement, 23, 452–473. Retrieved fromhttp://dx.doi.org/doi:10.1891/1061-3749.23.3.452.
43.
NelsonJ.ValentinoL.IaconoL.RopolloP.CineasN.StuartS. (2015). Measuring workload of nurses on a neurosurgical care unit. The Journal of Neuroscience Nursing: Journal of the American Association of Neuroscience Nurses, 47, E9–E19. Retrieved fromhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1097/JNN.0000000000000136
44.
NogueiraL. D.DominguesC.PoggettiR. S.DeSousaR. M. (2014). Nursing workload in intensive care unit trauma patients: Analysis of associated factors. PLoS One, 9. Retrieved fromhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0112125
PhamM. T.RajicA.GreigJ. D.SargeantJ. M.PapadopoulosA.McEwenS. A. (2014). A scoping review of scoping reviews: Advancing the approach and enhancing the consistency. Research Synthesis Methods, 5, 371–385. Retrieved fromhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.1123
47.
PrescottP. A. (1986). Vacancy, stability, and turnover of registered nurses in hospitals. Research in Nursing & Health, 9, 51–60. Retrieved fromhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/3634419
48.
PrescottP. A.SoekenK. L. (1996). Measuring nursing intensity in ambulatory care. Part I: Approaches to and uses of patient classification systems. Nursing Economic, 14, 14–21, 33.
RossettiA. C.GaidzinskiR. R.BraccoM. M. (2014). Determining workload and size of nursing team in the pediatric emergency department. Einstein (16794508), 12, 217–222. Retrieved fromhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1679-45082014AO2945
51.
SampsonC. H.GalemoreC. A. (2012). What every school nurse needs to know about Section 504 eligibility. NASN School Nurse, 27, 88–93. Retrieved fromhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1942602X12437879
52.
SteyrerJ.HuberC.ValentinA.StrunkG. (2013). Attitude is everything? The impact of workload, safety climate, and safety tools on medical errors: A study of intensive care units. Health Care Management Review, 38, 306–316. Retrieved fromhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1097/HMR.0b013e318272935a
53.
SwigerP.VanceD.PatricianP. (2016). Nursing workload in the acute-care setting: A concept analysis of nursing workload. Nursing Outlook, 64, 244–254. Retrieved fromhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.outlook.2016.01.003
54.
TarasH. L. (2014). School nursing—Beyond medications and procedures. JAMA Pediatrics, 168, 604–605. Retrieved from Retrieved fromhttp://dx.doi.org/
WillisE.HendersonJ.ToffoliL.WalterB. (2012). Calculating nurse staffing in community mental health and community health settings in South Australia. Nursing Forum, 47, 52–64. Retrieved fromhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6198.2011.00251.x
57.
YuD.MaY.SunQ.LuG.XuP. (2015). A nursing care classification system for assessing workload and determining optimal nurse staffing in a teaching hospital in China: A pre-post intervention study. International Journal of Nursing Practice, 21, 339–349. Retrieved fromhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ijn.12295
58.
ZirkelP. A.GranthomM. F.LovatoL. (2012). Section 504 and student health problems: The pivotal position of the school nurse. The Journal of School Nursing, 28, 423–432.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
