What Can Secondary School Students Teach Educators and School Nurses About Student Engagement in Health Promotion? A Scoping Review

Abstract

Student engagement represents a critical component of a comprehensive school health (CSH) approach to health promotion. Nevertheless, questions remain about its implementation. This scoping review updates the field of student engagement in health promotion. Of the 1,388 located articles, 14 qualify for inclusion in this study. An analysis reveals four themes. CSH programs that incorporate student engagement promote a sense of belonging to a community, encourage meaningful involvement, give voice to student concerns, and advance supportive relationships. This study finds a lack of research regarding student engagement in health promotion but confirms that student participation in CSH initiatives contributes to a sense of ownership. Consequently, we can infer that student ownership of health promotion takes place through their meaningful engagement and can effect social change.

Keywords

comprehensive school health student engagement school initiatives health promotion school nursing practice scoping review

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Anderson

Allen

Peckham

Goodwin

(2008). Asking the right questions: Scoping studies in the commissioning of research on the organisation and delivery of health services. Health Research Policy and Systems, 6, 7. doi:10.1186/1478-4505-6-7

Arksey

O’Malley

(2005). Scoping studies: Towards a methodological framework. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 8, 19–32. doi:10.1080/1364557032000119616

Arnold

Patton

Pearce

Whellams

(2012). Framework for the comprehensive school health approach. Calgary, AB: Alberta Health Services, Population and Public Health. Retrieved from http://www.albertahealthservices.ca/info/Page7648.aspx

Deschesnes

(2003). Comprehensive approaches to school health promotion: How to achieve broader implementation? Health Promotion International, 18, 387–396. doi:10.1093/heapro/dag410

Dooris

(2009). Holistic and sustainable health improvement: The contribution of the settings-based approach to health promotion. Perspectives in Public Health, 129, 29–36. doi:10.1177/1757913908098881

Eccles

Wang

M. T.

(2012). Part I commentary: So what is student engagement anyway? In Christenson

S. L.

Reschly

A. L.

Wylie

(Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 133–145). New York, NY: Springer Science & Business Media.

Enright

O’Sullivan

(2010). ‘Can I do it in my pyjamas?’ Negotiating a physical education curriculum with teenage girls. European Physical Education Review, 16, 203–222. doi:10.1177/1356336X10382967

Fletcher

(2005). Meaningful student involvement: A guide to inclusive school change. Olympia, WA: The Freechild Project. Retrieved from http://soundout.org

Fritsch

Heckert

K. A.

(2007). Working together: Health promoting schools and school nurses. Asian Nursing Research, 1, 147–152. doi:10.1016/s1976-1317(08)60017-1

10.

Garn

A. C.

McCaughtry

Kulik

N. L.

Kaseta

Maljak

Whalen

… Fahlman

(2014). Successful after-school physical activity clubs in urban high schools: Perspectives of adult leaders and student participants. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 33, 112–133. doi:10.1123/jtpe:2013-0006

11.

Goodyear

V. A.

Casey

Kirk

(2014). Hiding behind the camera: Social learning within the cooperative learning model to engage girls in physical education. Sport, Education & Society, 19, 712–734. doi:10.1080/13573322.2012.707124

12.

Gugglberger

Dür

(2011). Capacity building in and for health promoting schools: Results from a qualitative study. Health Policy, 101, 37–43. doi:10.1016/j.healthpol.2010.08.019

13.

Harrist

C. J.

(2012). Hearing voices. A response to “case study of a participatory health-promotion intervention in school”. Democracy & Education, 20, 1–5. Retrieved from http://democracyeducationjournal.org/home/vol20/iss1/10/

14.

Hart

(1997). Children’s participation: The theory and practice of involving young citizens in community development and environmental care. New York, NY: Earthscan.

15.

Hart

(2008). Stepping back from ‘The Ladder’: Reflections on a model of participatory work with children. In Reid

Jensen

B. B.

Nikel

Simovska

(Eds.), Participation and learning: Perspectives on education and the environment, health and sustainability (pp. 19–31). The Netherlands: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-1-4020-6416-6_2

16.

Jenkinson

K. A.

Naughton

Benson

A. C.

(2012). The GLAMA (Girls! Lead! Achieve! Mentor! Activate!) physical activity and peer leadership intervention pilot project: A process evaluation using the RE-AIM framework. BMC Public Health, 12, 55–55. doi:10.1186/1471-2458-12-55

17.

Johnny

(2005). UN convention on the rights of the child: A rationale for implementing participatory rights in schools. Canadian Journal of Educational Administration and Policy, 40. Retrieved from http://www.umanitoba.ca/publications/cjeap

18.

Jomaa

L. H.

McDonnell

Weirich

Hartman

Jensen

Probart

(2010). Student involvement in wellness policies: A study of Pennsylvania local education agencies. Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior, 42, 372–379. doi:10.1016/j.jneb.2009.07.012

19.

Joyce

B. L.

Harmon

M. J.

Pilling

L. B.

Johnson

R. H.

Hicks

V. L.

Brown-Schott

(2015). The preparation of community/public health nurses: Amplifying the impact. Public Health Nursing, 32, 595–597. doi:10.1111/phn.12236

20.

Kolbe

L. J.

Allensworth

D. D.

Potts-Datema

White

D. R.

(2015). What have we learned from collaborative partnerships to concomitantly improve both education and health? Journal of School Health, 85, 766–774. doi:10.1111/josh.12312

21.

Levac

Colquhoun

O’Brien

K. K.

(2010). Scoping studies: Advancing the methodology. Implementation Science, 5, 69. doi:10.1186/1748-5908-5-69

22.

Lind

(2007). The power of adolescent voices: Co-researchers in mental health promotion. Educational Action Research, 15, 371–383. doi:10.1080/09650790701514309

23.

Lundy

(2007). ‘Voice’ is not enough: Conceptualising article 12 of the United Nations convention on the rights of the child. British Educational Research Journal, 33, 927–942. doi:10.1080/01411920701657033

24.

Parsons

Taylor

(2011). Student engagement: What do we know and what should we do? Edmonton, AB: University of Alberta, Alberta Initiative for School Improvement.

25.

Reschly

A. L.

Christenson

S. L.

(2012). Jingle, jangle, and conceptual haziness: Evolution and future directions of the engagement construct. In Christenson

S. L.

Reschly

A. L.

Wylie

(Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 3–19). New York, NY: Springer Science & Business Media.

26.

Rew

Tyler

Fredland

Hannah

(2012). Adolescents’ concerns as they transition through high school. Advances in Nursing Science, 35, 205–221. doi:10.1097/ANS.0b013e318261a7d7

27.

Sawyer

S. M.

Afifi

R. A.

Bearinger

L. H.

Blakemore

S.-J.

Dick

Ezeh

A. C.

Patton

G. C.

(2012). Adolescence: A foundation for future health. The Lancet, 379, 1630–1640. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60072-5

28.

Schilling

Martinek

Carson

(2007). Youth leaders’ perceptions of commitment to a responsibility-based physical activity program. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 78, 48–60. doi:10.1080/02701367.2007.10599403

29.

Sikic

N. I.

Erbstein

Welch

Grundberg

Miller

(2012). Initial evaluation of a student-run fruit and vegetable business in urban high schools. Journal of Health Care for the Poor and Underserved, 23, 1590–1599. doi:10.1353/hpu.2012.0166

30.

Simovska

(2007). The changing meanings of participation in school-based health education and health promotion: The participants’ voices. Health Education Research, 22, 864–878. doi:10.1093/her/cym023

31.

Simovska

(2012). Case study of a participatory health-promotion intervention in school. Democracy & Education, 20, 1–10. Retrieved from http://democracyeducationjournal.org/home/vol20/iss1/4/

32.

Simovska

Jensen

B. B.

(2008). On-line learning environments and participatory health education: Teachers’ reflections. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 40, 651–669. doi:10.1080/00220270701648092

33.

Stokes

(2005). How drama can engage young people at risk of leaving school early. International Journal on School Disaffection, 3, 23–26.

34.

Stovold

Beecher

Foxlee

Noel-Storr

(2014). Study flow diagrams in Cochrane systematic review updates: An adapted PRISMA flow diagram. Systematic Reviews, 3. Retrieved from http://www.systematicreviewsjournal.com/content/3/1/54

35.

Streng

N. J.

(2007). A follow-up study of former student health advocates. The Journal of School Nursing, 23, 353–358. doi:10.1177/10598405070230060901

36.

United Nations General Assembly. (1989). Convention on the rights of the child. United Nations, Treaty Series, Vol. 1577, p. 3.

37.

Warne

Snyder

Gådin

K. G.

(2013). Photovoice: An opportunity and challenge for students’ genuine participation. Health Promotion International, 28, 299–310. doi:10.1093/heapro/das011

38.

Whitehead

(2006a). Health promotion in the practice setting: Findings from a review of clinical issues. Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing, 3, 165–184. doi:10.1111/j.1741-6787.2006.00068.x

39.

Whitehead

(2006b). The health-promoting school: What role for nursing? Journal of Clinical Nursing, 15, 264–271. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2702.2006.01294.x