Childhood obesity prevalence rates in the United States are the highest in the rural Appalachian areas. Teens mentoring younger children to reverse obesity health risks are an understudied approach. This randomized-controlled trial compared the effects of two curriculum delivery methods and assessed the mediating effects of the number of sessions attended on the outcomes. The control group received the 8-week Just for Kids! curriculum via an adult teacher in a classroom and the experimental group received the same curriculum via individual teen mentoring. Data collected at baseline and postintervention were analyzed using multilevel linear models. Each of the outcomes (e.g., body mass index, blood pressure, current lifestyle behaviors) were modeled separately. Only the mentored children demonstrated improved current lifestyle behaviors (e.g., physical activity and dietary patterns) and health outcomes. Teen mentoring was an effective and efficacious approach to impact the lifestyle patterns and health outcomes of children in a school setting.
ArmitageC. J. (2005). Can the theory of planned behavior predict the maintenance of physical activity?Health Psychology, 24, 235–245.
2.
AseltineR. H.DupreeM.LamleinP. (2000). Mentoring as a drug prevention strategy: An evaluation of support across ages. Adolescent and Family Health, 1, 11–20.
3.
BebestosE.ChroniS.TheodorakisY. (2002). Physically active students’ intentions and self efficacy towards healthy eating. Psychological Reports, 91, 485–495.
BellamyG. R.BolinJ. N.GammL. D. (2011). Rural healthy people 2010,2020, and beyond: The need goes on. Family & Community Health,
34, 182–188.
6.
BruggJ.deVetE.deNooijerJ.VerplankenB. (2006). Predicting fruit consumption: Cognitions, intentionsand habits. Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior, 38, 73–81.
7.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2008). Behavioral risk factors surveillance system. Retrieved fromhttp://www.cdc.gov/brfss
8.
ChatzisarantisN.HaggerM. S.BiddleS.SmithB. (2005). The stability of the attitude-intention relationship in the context of physical activity. Journal of Sports Sciences, 23, 49–61.
9.
ConnerM.NormanP.BellR. (2002). The theory of planned behavior and healthy eating. Health Psychology, 21, 194–201.
10.
DanielsS. R. (2009). Complications of obesity in children and adolescents. International Journal of Obesity, 33, S60–S65.
11.
HaggerM. S.ChatzisarantisN.CulverhouseT.BiddleS. (2003). The processes by which perceived autonomy support in physical education promotes leisure time physical activity intentions and behavior: A trans contextual model. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 784–795.
12.
HansonK. (2003). Big brothers big sisters high school bigs evaluation for school year 2002–2003. Philadelphia, PA: Big Brothers Big Sisters of America.
13.
HarrisJ. (1998). The nurture assumption. New York, NY: Free Press.
14.
HeaneyC. A.IsraelB. A. (2008). Social networks and social support. In K. Glanz, B. K. Rimer, & K. Viswanath (Eds.), Health behavior and health education: Theory, research, and practice (pp. 189–207). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
15.
JamesK. S.ConnellyC. D. (2007). Just for kids: A school based intervention to improve fitness and nutrition knowledge. Communicating Nursing Research, 40, 256.
16.
JanickiD. M.LimC. S.PerriM. G.BobroffL. B.MathewsA. E.BrumbackB. A.SilversteinJ. H. (2011). The extension family lifestyle intervention project (E-FLIP for kids): Design and methods. Contemporary Clinical Trials, 32, 50–58.
17.
JanickiD. M.SallinenB. J.PerriG. G.LutesL. D.SilversteinJ. H.BrumbackL. (2009). Comparison of program costs from parent-only and family based interventions for pediatric obesity in medically underserved rural settings. Journal of Rural Health, 25, 326–330.
18.
JohnsonS.MellinL. (2003). Just for kids!San Anselmo, CA: Balboa Publishing.
19.
KarcherM. (2005). Cross-age peer mentoring. In DuboisD. L.KarcherM. J. (Eds.), Handbook of youth mentoring (pp. 266–285). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
20.
KarcherK. J. (2008). The study of mentoring in the learning environment (SMILE): A randomized evaluation of the effectiveness of school-based mentoring. Prevention Science, 9, 99–113.
21.
KarcherM.DavisC.PowellB. (2002). Developmental mentoring in schools: Testing connectedness as a mediating variable in the promotion of academic achievement. The School Community Journal, 12, 36–52.
22.
KarcherM.NakkulaM.HarrisJ. (2005). Developmental mentoring match characteristics: Correspondence between mentors’ and mentees’ assessments of relationship quality. Journal of Primary Prevention, 26, 93–110.
23.
KellerT. E.PryceJ. M. (2010). Mutual but not equal: Mentoring as a hybrid of familiar relationship roles. New Directions for Youth Development, 126, 33–50.
24.
KrebsN. F.HimesJ. H.JacobsonD.NicklasT.A.GuildayP.StyneD. (2007). Assessment of child overweight and obesity. Pediatrics, 120, S193–S228.
25.
KumanyikaS.GrierS. (2006). Targeting interventions for ethnic minority and low income populations. The Future of Children, 16, 187–207.
26.
Kuperminic, G., Emshoff, J., Reiner, M., Secrest, L., Holditch-Niolon, P., & Foster, J. D. (2005). Integration of mentoring with other programs and services. In DuboisD.KarcherM. (Eds.), Handbook of youth mentoring. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
27.
Montgomery-ReaganK.BiancoJ. S.HehV.RettosJ.HustonR. S. (2010). Prevalence and correlates of high body mass index in rural Appalachian children aged 6-11 years. Rural and Remote Health, 10, 1408.
28.
MuthenL. K.MuthenB. O. (2002) How to use a Monte Carlo study to decide on sample size and determine power. Structural Equation Modeling, 9, 599–620.
29.
National Institute of Child Health and Human Development. (2003). Frequency and intensity of activity of third-grade children in physical education. Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine, 157, 185–190.
30.
OgdenC. L.CarrollM. D.KitB. K.FlegalK. M. (2012, January). Prevalence of obesity in the United States, 2009–2010. NCHS Data Brief 2012, 82, 1–8.
31.
Oza-FrankR.NortonA.ScarpittiH.WapnerA.ConreyE. (2011). A report on the body mass index of Ohio’s third graders: 2004–2010. Columbus: Ohio Department of Health.
32.
PortwoodS. G.AyersP. M.KinnisonK. E.WarisR. G.WiseD. (2005). Youth friends: Outcomes from a school-based mentoring program. Journal of Primary Prevention, 26, 129–145.
33.
RothJ.Brooks-GunnJ. (2003). What exactly is a youth development program? Answers from research and practice. Applied Developmental Science, 7, 94–111.
34.
SawyerR. D. (2001). Mentoring but not being mentored: Improving student-to-student mentoring programs to attract urban youth to teaching. Urban Education, 36, 39–59.
35.
SheehanK.DiCaraJ.LeBaillyS.ChristoffelK. (1999). Adapting the gang model: Peer mentoring for violence prevention. Pediatrics, 104, 50–54.
36.
SmithL. H. (2011). Piloting the use of teen mentors to promote a healthy diet and physical activity among children in Appalachia. Journal for Specialists in Pediatric Nursing, 16, 16–26.
37.
SmithL. H.BarkerE. (2009). Exploring youth development with diverse children: Correlates of risk, health, and thriving behaviors. Journal for Specialists in Pediatric Nursing, 14, 12–21.
38.
SmithL. H.HollomanC. (2011). Health status and access to health care services: A comparison between Ohio’s rural non-Appalachian and Appalachian families. Family and Community Health, 34, 102–110.
39.
Tai-SealeT.ChandlerC. (2003). Nutrition and overweight concerns in rural areas: A literature review. In L. Gamm & L. Hutchinson (Eds.) Rural Healthy People 2010: A companion document to Healthy People 2010, Vol.2 (pp. 115–130). College Station: Texas A & M University System Health Science Center, School of Rural Public Health.
40.
U.S. Department of Health & Human Services, National Institutes of Health, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute. (2005). Fourth report on the diagnosis, evaluation, and treatment of high blood pressure in children and adolescents (NIH Publication No. 05-5267). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
41.
WestermanJ. J. (2002). Mentoring and cross-age mentoring: Improving academic achievement through a unique partnership (Unpublished dissertation), University of, Lexington, Kentucky.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
