BroomeM. (1993). Integrative literature reviews for the development of concepts. In RodgersB.KnaflK. (Eds.), Concept development in nursing (2nd ed., pp. 231–250). Philadelphia, PA: W.B. Saunders.
2.
ConnV.RathS. (2003). Managing primary study quality in meta-analyses. Research in Nursing and Health, 26, 322–333.
3.
CooperH. (1998). Synthesizing research: A guide for literature reviews (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
4.
EvansD.KowankoI. (2001). Literature reviews: Evolution of a research methodolgy. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 18, 33–38.
5.
FinkA. (2009). Conducting research literature reviews: From the Internet to paper (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
6.
MoherD.LiberatiA.TetzlaffJ.AltmanD. G., & The PRISMA Group. (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRIMSA statement. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 62, 1006–1012.
7.
WhittemoreR. (2005). Combining the evidence in nursing research: methods and implications. Nursing Research, 54, 56–62.
8.
WhittemoreR.KnaflK. (2005). The integrative review: Updated methodology. Journal of Advanced Nursing, Dec, 52, 546–553.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
