The Influence of Light-Dark Adaptation and Lateral Inhibition on Phototaxic Foraging: A Hypothetical Animal Study

Abstract

Vision did not arise and evolve merely so that individuals might "see" things but rather so that they might act on and interact with their habitat. Thus it might be misleading to study vision without looking also at its natural coupling to vital action. Here we investigate this problem in a simulation study of the simplest kind of visually guided foraging by a species of two-dimensional hypothetical animal called the (diurnal) paddler. In a previous study, we developed a hypothetical animal called the archaepaddler, which used positive phototaxis to forage for autoluminescent prey in a totally dark environment (the deep sea). Here we discuss possible visual mechanisms that allow (diurnal) paddlers to live in shallower water, foraging for light-reflecting prey in ambient light. The modification consists of two stages. In the first stage, Weber adaptation compresses the retinal illumination into an acceptable range of neural firing frequencies. In the second stage, high-pass filtering with lateral inhibition separates background responses from foreground responses. We report on a number of parameter studies conducted with the foraging diurnal paddler, in which the influence of dark-light adaptation and lateral inhibition on foreground-background segregation and foraging performance ("fitness") are quantified. It is shown that the paddler can survive adequately for a substantial range of parameters that compromises between discarding as much unwanted visual (background) information as possible and retaining as much information on potential prey as possible. Parameter values that optimize purely visual performance, such as foreground-background segregation, are not always optimal for foraging performance, and vice versa. This article shows that studies of vision might indeed require more serious consideration of the goals of vision and the ethogram of the studied organisms than has been customary.

Keywords

dark-light adaptation lateral inhibition hypothetical animal;phototaxic navigation Weber adaptation

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Beer, R.D. (1990). Intelligence as adaptive behavior—an experiment in computational neuroethology. Boston: Academic.

Beer, R.D. , & Gallagher, J.C. (1992). Evolving dynamical neural networks for adaptive behavior. Adaptive Behavior, 1, 91-122.

Bertin, R. J. V (1994). Natural smartness in hypothetical animals—of paddlers and glow-balls. Unpublished doctoral thesis, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands.

Bertin, R. J. V , & van de Grind, W.A. (1996). Phototropic foraging in the archaepaddler, a hypothetical deep-sea species. Manuscript submitted for publication.

Bouman, M.A. , van de Grind, W.A. , & Zuidema, P. (1985). Quantum fluctuations in vision. In: W Wolf (Ed.), Progress in optics (Vol. 22). Amsterdam: North-Holland .

Braitenberg, V. (1984). Vehicles—experiments in synthetic psychology . Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Cliff, D. , & Bullock, S. (1993). Adding "foveal vision" to Wilson's animat. Adaptive Behavior, 2, 49-72.

Cliff, D. , Husbands, P. , & Harvey, I. (1993). Explorations in evolutionary robotics. Adaptive Behavior, 2, 73-110.

Corbacho, F.J. , & Arbib, M.A. (1995). Learning to detour. Adaptive Behavior , 4, 419-468.

10.

Cruse, H. , Brunn, D.E. , Bartling, Ch., Dean, J. , Dreifert, M. , Kindermann , J. , & Schmitz, J. (1995). Walking: A complex behavior controlled by simple networks. Adaptive Behavior, 4, 385-418.

11.

Dennett, D.C. (1995). Darwin's dangerous idea. New York: Simon & Schuster.

12.

Egelhaaf, M. , & Borst, A. (1992). Are there separate ON and OFF channels in fly motion vision? Visual Neuroscience, 8, 151-164.

13.

Egelhaaf, M. , & Borst, A. (1993). Motion computation and visual orientation in flies . Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology [A], 104, 659-673.

14.

Ekeberg, O. , Lansner, A. , & Grillner, S. (1995). The neural control of fish swimming studied through numerical simulations. Adaptive Behavior, 4, 363-384. Franceschini, N. , Riehle, A. , & le Nestour, A. (1989). Directionally selective motion detection by insect neurons. In D. G. Stavenga & R. C. Hardie (Eds.), Facets of vision. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.

15.

Gibson, J.J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. Houston: Houghton Mifflin.

16.

van de Grind, W.A. (1990). Smart mechanisms for the visual evaluation and control of self-motion. In R. Warren & A. Wertheim (Eds.), Perception and control of self-motion. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

17.

van de Grind, W A., Koenderink, J.J. , & Bouman, M.A. (1970). Models of the processing of quantum signals by the human peripheral retina. Kybernetik , 6, 213-227.

18.

Gruau, F. (1994). Automatic definition of modular neural networks . Adaptive Behavior, 2, 151-183.

19.

Hartline, H.K. , & Ratliff, F. (1974). Studies on excitation and inhibition in the retina . London: Chapman and Hall.

20.

Koenderink, J.J. , van de Grind, W A., & Bouman, M.A. (1970). Models of retinal signal processing at high luminances. Kybernetik, 6, 227-237.

21.

Kühn, A. (1919). Die Orientierung der Tiere im Raum. Jena: Fischer.

22.

Loeb, J. (1918). Forced movements, tropisms and animal conduct . Philadelphia : Lippincott. (Republished 1973, New York: Dover.)

23.

Lythgoe, J.N. (1979). The ecology of vision. Oxford : Clarendon Press.

24.

Rössler, O.E. (1974). Adequate locomotion strategies for an abstract organism in an abstract environment—a relational approach to brain function . In M. Conrad , W Güttinger , & M. Dal Cin (Eds.), Lecture notes in biomathematics 4: Physics and mathematics of the nervous system. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.

25.

Shapley, R.M. , & Enroth- Cugell, C. (1984). Visual adaptation and retinal gain controls. Progress in Retinal Research, 3, 263-346.

26.

Terzopoulos, D. , Tu, X. , & Grzeszczuk, R. (1994). Artificial fishes with autonomous locomotion, perception, behavior, and learning in a simulated physical world. In R. Brooks & P Maes (Eds.), Artificial Life IV: Proceedings of the Fourth International Workshop on the Synthesis and Simulation of Living Systems. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

27.

Walter, W.G. (1950). An imitation of life. Scientific American, 182, 42-45.

28.

Walter, W.G. (1951). A machine that learns. Scientific American, 185, 60-63.