An Ethological Model for Implementation in Mobile Robots

Abstract

This article describes a neuroethological model of learning and motivation that accounts for many of the behavioral phenomena observed in animals. Unusual predictions from the model have been tested and shown to be demonstrable in laboratory Siamese fighting fish. In addition, the model is sufficiently mathematically well defined to be implementable in a robot or in computer simulation. A trial implementation in a mobile robot was carried out as part of this work. This article describes a simplified version of the model that was programmed into the robot, a thought experiment designed to show the main features of the model, and the preliminary robot experiments that were carried out. Using robots for ethological models of animal behavior is interesting for both robotics and ethological research: The study of robot autonomy can be enhanced through an understanding of complex and realistic models of animal autonomy, and ethological research should benefit from a supply of guaranteed "naive" agents on which rigorous testing of such models is tractable.

Keywords

learning mobile robot behavioral model

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Baloch, A.A. , & Waxman, A.M. (1991). Visual learning, adaptive expectations, and behavioral conditioning of the mobile robot MAVIN. Neural Networks 4(3), 271-302.

Brooks, R.A. (1986a). Achieving artificial intelligence through building robots. A.I. memo 899, MIT AI Laboratory, Cambridge, MA.

Brooks, R.A. (1986b). A robust layered control system for a mobile robot. IEEE Journal of Robotics and Automation, 2, 14-23.

Brooks, R.A. (1990). Elephants don't play chess. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 6,3-15.

Carpenter, G. A. , & Grossberg, S. (Eds.). (1991). Pattern recognition by self-organizing neural networks. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Forster, P.M. (1991). Hardware description of the mobile robot "Ben Hope." Really Useful Robot (RUR) working paper 5.1, Department of Artificial Intelligence, Edinburgh.

Hallam, B.E. , Hallam, J.C.T. , & Hayes, G.M. (in press). A dynamic net for robot control. In P van der Smagt , & O. Omidvar (Eds.), Neural Systems for Robotics. Norwood, NJ : Ablex. (Also available as research paper no. 694 from the Department of Artificial Intelligence, University of Edinburgh.)

Halperin, J.R.P. (1990). A connectionist neural network model of aggression . Unpublished doctoral thesis, Department of Ethology, Toronto University, Canada.

Halperin, J.R.P. , & Dunham, D.W. (1993). Postponed conditioning: Testing a hypothesis about synaptic strengthening. Adaptive Behavior, 1(1), 39-64.

10.

Halperin, J.R.P. , Dunham, D.W. , & Ye, S. (1992). Social isolation of betta splendens increases primed social display but decreases display readiness. Behavioral Processes, 28, 13-32.

11.

Hebb, D.O. (1949). The organization of behavior. New York: Wiley.

12.

McCulloch, W. S., & Pitts, W.H. (1943). A logical calculus of the ideas imminent in nervous activity. Bulletin of Mathematical Biophysics, 5, 115-133.

13.

McFarland, D.J. (1985). Animal behaviour. Harlow, UK: Longman Scientific & Technical.

14.

McFarland, D.J. , & Sibly, R.M. (1975). The behavioural final common path. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Series B, 270, 265-293.

15.

Rosenblatt, F. (1962). Principles of neurodynamics. Washington, D.C.: Spartan Press.

16.

Sinclair, J.D. (1981). The rest principle: A neurophysiological theory of behavior. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

17.

Spetch, M.L. , Wilkie, D.M. , & Pinel, J.P.J. (1981). Backward conditioning: A re-evaluation of the empirical evidence. Psychological Bulletin, 89, 163-175.

18.

Sutton, R.S. (1984). Temporal credit assignment in reinforcement learning . Unpublished doctoral thesis, University of Massachusetts , Amherst.

19.

Wilson, S.W. (1990). The animat path to AI. In J.-A. Meyer & S. Wilson , (Eds.), From animals to animats. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.