Less-is-more describes a principle underlying decision making. Embodiment, on the other hand, argues that the body plays an important role in processes that have classically been characterized as mental. We argue that decision making is facilitated by reducing the amount of mental information processing (less-is-more) through the exploitation of the constant stream of rich sensorimotor information (embodiment), a concept we call LIME. LIME argues that, via embodiment, information processing is “constrained” by and “off-loaded” into the body. Constraining involves the body reducing the input or generated options before they enter into mental information processing. Off-loading involves the body or the environment performing the information processing. LIME underlies cognition generally, but is most accessibly demonstrated in sport phenomena, and we use this domain to sketch out the breadth of this concept in four case studies. LIME connects first principles of cognition to real-life phenomena, providing explanatory insights into ecological rationality and frameworks explaining adaptive behavior.
Abd-ElfattahH. M.AbdelazeimF. H.ElshennawyS. (2015). Physical and cognitive consequences of fatigue: A review. Journal of Advanced Research, 6(3), 351–358. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jare.2015.01.011
2.
AgliotiS. M.CesariP.RomaniM.UrgesiC. (2008). Action anticipation and motor resonance in elite basketball players. Nature Neuroscience, 11(9), 1109–1116. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.2182
BainA. (1868). The senses and the intellect. Adamant Media Corporation.
6.
BarrocasR.RoeschS.GawrilowC.MoellerK. (2020). Putting a finger on numerical development–reviewing the contributions of kindergarten finger gnosis and fine motor skills to numerical abilities. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 1012. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01012
BarteJ. C. M.NieuwenhuysA.GeurtsS. A. E.KompierM. A. J. (2020). Effects of fatigue on interception decisions in soccer. International Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 18(1), 64–75. https://doi.org/10.1080/1612197X.2018.1478869
9.
BeilockS. L. (2008). Beyond the playing field: Sport psychology meets embodied cognition. International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 1(1), 19–30. https://doi.org/10.1080/17509840701836875
10.
BernsteinN. A. (1967). The co-ordination and regulation of movements (1st ed.). Pergamon Press.
11.
BerntsonG. G.CacioppoJ. T. (2007). Integrative physiology: Homeostasis, allostasis, and the orchestration of systemic physiology. In Handbook of psychophysiology (3rd ed, pp. 433–452). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511546396.019
12.
BhallaM.ProffittD. R. (1999). Visual–motor recalibration in geographical slant perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25(4), 1076–1096. https://doi.org/10.1037//0096-1523.25.4.1076
BraitenbergV. (1986). Vehicles: Experiments in synthetic psychology. MIT Press.
15.
BramsS.ZivG.LevinO.SpitzJ.WagemansJ.WilliamsA. M.HelsenW. F. (2019). The relationship between gaze behavior, expertise, and performance: A systematic review. Psychological Bulletin, 145(10), 980–1027. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000207
16.
BrightonH.GigerenzerG. (2012). Homo heuristicus: Less-is-more effects in adaptive cognition. The Malaysian Journal of Medical Sciences: MJMS, 19(4), 6–16.
BuccinoG.BinkofskiF.FinkG. R.FadigaL.FogassiL.GalleseV.SeitzR. J.ZillesK.RizzolattiG.FreundH. J. (2001). Action observation activates premotor and parietal areas in a somatotopic manner: An fMRI study. The European Journal of Neuroscience, 13(2), 400–404.
19.
CabralD. A. R.DaouM.BacelarM. F. B.ParmaJ. O.MillerM. W. (2020). Does learning a skill with the expectation of teaching it impair the skill’s execution under psychological pressure if the skill is learned with analogy instructions?Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 51, Article 101757. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2020.101757
20.
Cañal-BrulandR. (2017). Deception detection in action: Embodied simulation in antisocial human interactions. Frontiers in Psychology, 8. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00166
21.
CasileA.GieseM. A. (2006). Nonvisual motor training influences biological motion perception. Current Biology: CB, 16(1), 69–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2005.10.071
22.
CisekP.Pastor-BernierA. (2014). On the challenges and mechanisms of embodied decisions. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 369(1655), Article 20130479. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2013.0479
CorcoranK.MussweilerT. (2010). The cognitive miser’s perspective: Social comparison as a heuristic in self-judgements. European Review of Social Psychology, 21(1), 78–113. https://doi.org/10.1080/10463283.2010.508674
27.
CraigA. D. (2003). Interoception: The sense of the physiological condition of the body. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 13(4), 500–505. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0959-4388(03)00090-4
EngelA. K.MayeA.KurthenM.KönigP. (2013). Where’s the action? The pragmatic turn in cognitive science. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 17(5), 202–209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2013.03.006
31.
FischerM. H. (2024). The embodied cognition approach: Principles and research questions. In Experimental Methods in Embodied Cognition (pp. 3–18). Routledge: Taylor & Francis.
FriedrichJ.FischerM. H.RaabM. (2025). Issues in grounded cognition and how to solve them – The minimalist account. Journal of Cognition, 8(1), 31. https://doi.org/10.5334/joc.444
35.
GarfinkelS. N.SethA. K.BarrettA. B.SuzukiK.CritchleyH. D. (2015). Knowing your own heart: Distinguishing interoceptive accuracy from interoceptive awareness. Biological Psychology, 104, 65–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2014.11.004
36.
GegenfurtnerA.LehtinenE.SäljöR. (2011). Expertise differences in the comprehension of visualizations: A meta-analysis of eye-tracking research in professional domains. Educational Psychology Review, 23(4), 523–552. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-011-9174-7
37.
GibsonJ. J. (1977). The theory of affordances. In ShawR.BransfordJ. (Eds.), Perceiving, acting, and knowing. Toward an ecological psychology (pp. 67–82). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
GordonJ.MaselliA.LanciaG. L.ThieryT.CisekP.PezzuloG. (2021). The road towards understanding embodied decisions. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 131, 722–736. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2021.09.034
43.
GüntherF.NguyenT.ChenL.DudschigC.KaupB.GlenbergA. M. (2020). Immediate sensorimotor grounding of novel concepts learned from language alone. Journal of Memory and Language, 115, Article 104172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2020.104172
44.
HaiderH.FrenschP. A. (1999). Eye movement during skill acquisition: More evidence for the information-reduction hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 25(1), 172–190. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.25.1.172
45.
HaukO.JohnsrudeI.PulvermüllerF. (2004). Somatotopic representation of action words in human motor and premotor cortex. Neuron, 41(2), 301–307. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0896-6273(03)00838-9
46.
HerbertB. M.PollatosO. (2012). The body in the mind: On the relationship between interoception and embodiment. Topics in Cognitive Science, 4(4), 692–704. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1756-8765.2012.01189.x
47.
HerbertB. M.UlbrichP.SchandryR. (2007). Interoceptive sensitivity and physical effort: Implications for the self-control of physical load in everyday life. Psychophysiology, 44(2), 194–202. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8986.2007.00493.x
48.
HutchinsE. (1995). Cognition in the wild. The MIT Press. xviii, 381.
49.
HutchinsonA. (2018). Endure: Mind, body, and the curiously elastic limits of human performance. HarperCollins.
50.
IodiceP.CallusoC.BarcaL.BertolloM.RipariP.PezzuloG. (2017). Fatigue increases the perception of future effort during decision making. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 33, 150–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2017.08.013
51.
IodiceP.PorcielloG.BufalariI.BarcaL.PezzuloG. (2019). An interoceptive illusion of effort induced by false heart-rate feedback. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 116(28), 13897–13902. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1821032116
52.
JacksonR. C.WarrenS.AbernethyB. (2006). Anticipation skill and susceptibility to deceptive movement. Acta Psychologica, 123(3), 355–371. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2006.02.002
53.
JeukendrupA.VanDiemenA. (1998). Heart rate monitoring during training and competition in cyclists. Journal of Sports Sciences, 16(Suppl), S91–S99. https://doi.org/10.1080/026404198366722
54.
KalE.ProséeR.WintersM.van der KampJ. (2018). Does implicit motor learning lead to greater automatization of motor skills compared to explicit motor learning? A systematic review. PloS One, 13(9), Article e0203591. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0203591
KinradeN. P.JacksonR. C.AshfordK. J. (2010). Dispositional reinvestment and skill failure in cognitive and motor tasks. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 11(4), 312–319. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2010.02.005
57.
KleinE.MoellerK.WillmesK.NuerkH.-C.DomahsF. (2011). The influence of implicit hand-based representations on mental arithmetic. Frontiers in Psychology, 2, 197. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00197
58.
KonczakJ.MeeuwsenH. J.CressM. E. (1992). Changing affordances in stair climbing: The perception of maximum climbability in young and older adults. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18(3), 691–697. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.18.3.691
59.
KruglanskiA. W.GigerenzerG. (2011). Intuitive and deliberate judgments are based on common principles. Psychological Review, 118(1), 97–109. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0020762
LamW. K.MaxwellJ. P.MastersR. S. W. (2009). Analogy learning and the performance of motor skills under pressure. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 31(3), 337–357. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsep.31.3.337
LiaoC. M.MastersR. S. W. (2001). Analogy learning: A means to implicit motor learning. Journal of Sports Sciences, 19(5), 307–319. https://doi.org/10.1080/02640410152006081
LiuY.ChenW.BaiY.LiangX.LiG.GaoW.LinL. (2025). Aligning cyber space with physical world: A comprehensive survey on embodied AI. IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics, 30(6), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1109/TMECH.2025.3574943
67.
Luis del CampoV.Morenas MartínJ.MusculusL.RaabM. (2024). Embodied planning in climbing: How pre-planning informs motor execution. Frontiers in Psychology. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1337878
68.
MaselliA.GordonJ.EluchansM.LanciaG. L.ThieryT.MorettiR.CisekP.PezzuloG. (2023). Beyond simple laboratory studies: Developing sophisticated models to study rich behavior. Physics of Life Reviews, 46, 220–244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plrev.2023.07.006
69.
MastersR. S. W. (1992). Knowledge, knerves and know‐how: The role of explicit versus implicit knowledge in the breakdown of a complex motor skill under pressure. British Journal of Psychology, 83(3), 343–358. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8295.1992.tb02446.x
70.
MastersR. S. W.MaxwellJ. (2008). The theory of reinvestment. International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 1(2), 160–183. https://doi.org/10.1080/17509840802287218
71.
MatarićM. J. (1998). Behavior-based robotics as a tool for synthesis of artificial behavior and analysis of natural behavior. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 2(3), 82–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613(98)01141-3
72.
MaxwellJ. P.MastersR. S. W.EvesF. F. (2000). From novice to no know-how: A longitudinal study of implicit motor learning. Journal of Sports Sciences, 18(2), 111–120. https://doi.org/10.1080/026404100365180
73.
McBeathM. K.ShafferD. M.KaiserM. K. (1995). How baseball outfielders determine where to run to catch fly balls. Science, 268(5210), 569–573. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.7725104
74.
MichirevA.MusculusL.RaabM. (2021). A developmental embodied choice perspective explains the development of numerical choices. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 694750. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.694750
75.
MüllerVincentHoffmannMatej (2017). What is morphological computation? On how the body contributes to cognition and control. Artificial Life, 23(1), 1–24.
76.
MurakiE. J.SpeedL. J.PexmanP. M. (2023). Insights into embodied cognition and mental imagery from aphantasia. Nature Reviews Psychology, 2(10), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1038/s44159-023-00221-9
OudejansR. R. D.MichaelsC. F.BakkerF. C.DolnéM. A. (1996). The relevance of action in perceiving affordances: Perception of catchableness of fly balls. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 22(4), 879–891. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.22.4.879
79.
ParrT.PezzuloG.FristonK. J. (2022). Active inference: The free energy principle in mind, brain, and behavior. MIT Press.
80.
PetraccaE. (2021). Embodying bounded rationality: From embodied bounded rationality to embodied rationality. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 710607. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.710607
PezzuloG.CastelfranchiC. (2009). Thinking as the control of imagination: A conceptual framework for goal-directed systems. Psychological Research PRPF, 73(4), 559–577. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-009-0237-z
83.
PezzuloG.CisekP. (2016). Navigating the affordance landscape: Feedback control as a process model of behavior and cognition. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 20(6), 414–424. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2016.03.013
84.
PfeiferR.GómezG. (2009). Morphological computation – Connecting brain, body, and environment. In SendhoffB.KörnerE.SpornsO.RitterH.DoyaK. (Eds.), Creating brain-like intelligence: From basic principles to complex intelligent systems (pp. 66–83). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-00616-6_5
85.
PfeiferR.ScheierC. (2001). Understanding intelligence. MIT press.
86.
PizzeraA. (2012). Gymnastic judges benefit from their own motor experience as gymnasts. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 83(4), 603–607. https://doi.org/10.1080/02701367.2012.10599887
87.
PooltonJ. M.MastersR. S. W. (2014). Chunking/Dechunking. In Encyclopedia of sport and exercise psychology. Sage.
88.
PooltonJ. M.MastersR. S. W.MaxwellJ. P. (2006). The influence of analogy learning on decision-making in table tennis: Evidence from behavioural data. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 7(6), 677–688. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2006.03.005
PrinzW. (1990). A common coding approach to perception and action. In NeumannO.PrinzW. (Eds.), Relationships between perception and action: Current approaches (pp. 167–201). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-75348-0_7
Rączaszek-LeonardiJ. (2023). What dynamic approaches have taught Us about cognition and what they have not: On values in motion and the importance of replicable forms. Topics in Cognitive Science, tops.12709. https://doi.org/10.1111/tops.12709
RobbinsP.AydedeM. (2001). A short primer on situated cognition. In RobbinsP.AydedeM. (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of situated cognition (1st ed., pp. 3–10). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511816826.001
99.
SchaffnerK. F. (1993). Discovery and explanation in biology and medicine. University of Chicago Press.
100.
SeifertL.DicksM.WittmannF.WolfP. (2021). The perception of nested affordances: An examination of expert climbers. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 52, Article 101843. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2020.101843
101.
SeifertL.OrthD.MantelB.BoulangerJ.HéraultR.DicksM. (2018). Affordance realization in climbing: Learning and transfer. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 820. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00820
ShapiroL. A. (2019). Embodied cognition. Routledge.
105.
ShapiroL. A.SpauldingS. (2019). Embodied cognition and sport. In CappuccioM. L. (Ed.), Handbook of embodied cognition and sport psychology (pp. 3–22). The MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/10764.003.0006
106.
ShepardR. N. (1984). Ecological constraints on internal representation: Resonant kinematics of perceiving, imagining, thinking, and dreaming. Human Perception: Institutional Performance and Reform in Australia, 91(4), 405–435. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351156288-32
St Clair GibsonA.SwartJ.TuckerR. (2018). The interaction of psychological and physiological homeostatic drives and role of general control principles in the regulation of physiological systems, exercise and the fatigue process—The Integrative governor theory. European Journal of Sport Science, 18(1), 25–36. https://doi.org/10.1080/17461391.2017.1321688
111.
SullivanR.UigaL.MastersR. S. W.AnsonG.NieuwenhuysA. (2022). Conscious motor processing and the pressure-performance relationship: A systematic review. International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 17(2), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/1750984X.2022.2127327
112.
TangT.MakC. T.WongW. L.CapioC. M.LiJ.MastersR. S. W.ChanD. K. C. (2023). A meta-analysis of the association between movement specific reinvestment and motor performance. International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 18, 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/1750984X.2023.2214813
113.
ThelenE.SchönerG.ScheierC.SmithL. B. (2001). The dynamics of embodiment: A field theory of infant perseverative reaching. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24(1), 1–34. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X01003910
114.
ToddP. M.GigerenzerG. (2000). Précis of simple heuristics that make Us smart. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 23(5), 727–741. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0140525x00003447
TrumppN. M.UlrichM.KieferM. (2024). Experiential grounding of abstract concepts: Processing of abstract mental state concepts engages brain regions involved in mentalizing, automatic speech, and lip movements. NeuroImage, 288, Article 120539. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2024.120539
TverskyA.KahnemanD. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases: Biases in judgments reveal some heuristics of thinking under uncertainty. Science, 185(4157), 1124–1131. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.185.4157.1124
119.
VogelS. (2013). Comparative biomechanics: Life’s physical world (2nd ed). Princeton university press.
120.
VoigtL.FriedrichJ.GroveP.HeinrichN.IttlingerS.IskraM.KoopL.MichirevA.SparascioS.RaabM. (2023). Advancing judgment and decision-making research in sport psychology by using the body as an informant in embodied choices. Asian Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 3(1), 47–56.
121.
VoigtL.RaabM.MastersR. S. W.EckardtV.GroveP.HoskensM.LabordeS.ParkS. H.PizzeraA.RedlichD.SidhuA.SullivanR.UigaL.NieuwenhuysA. (2025). Unifying rules for simplified information processing during actions – less is more. International Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/1612197X.2025.2525236
122.
VygotskyL. S. (1978). In ColeM.John-SteinerV.ScribnerS.SoubermanE. (Eds.), Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes (Revised ed. edition). Harvard University Press.
123.
WarrenW. H. (1984). Perceiving affordances: Visual guidance of stair climbing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 10(5), 683–703. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.10.5.683
124.
WilliamsA. M.EricssonK. A. (2005). Perceptual-cognitive expertise in sport: Some considerations when applying the expert performance approach. Human Movement Science, 24(3), 283–307. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.humov.2005.06.002
ZeuwtsL. H. R. H.IlianoE.SmithM.DeconinckF.LenoirM. (2021). Mental fatigue delays visual search behaviour in young cyclists when negotiating complex traffic situations: A study in virtual reality. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 161, Article 106387. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2021.106387
