Practice,enactivism,and ecological psychology

Abstract

The Course-of-Experience Framework (CEF) represents a promising path forward for embodied and enactive approaches to cognitive science. It aims to provide a comprehensive explanation of representation-hungry activities by grounding cognition in practice. Practice is not merely something that we do as a means to an end, but is constitutive of cognition. Puzzlingly, however, the CEF begins to develop a distributed approach to cognition by viewing individuals through their cultural-cognitive ecology or milieu, before shifting focus to an internalist interpretation of enactive agency. CEF states that the agent enacts their world and discovers themselves through practice, but provides no clear account of organism-environment mutuality. This is problematic because CEF’s notion of practice depends on organism-environment mutuality in its first core assumption. The tendency to downplay the importance of the environment is likely due to a holdover of early enactivist ideas that have sparked tensions between ecological psychology and enactivism in the past. We attempt to re-align the CEF with the enactive project, which we think is gradually shifting away from individualistic concepts like autopoiesis and sense-making toward social and ecological concepts like participatory sense-making and affordances.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Atkin

(2013). Peirce’s theory of signs. In Zalta

E. N.

(Ed.). The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2013 Edition.

Baggs

(2018). A psychology of the in between? Constructivist Foundations, 13(3), 395–397.

Baggs

Chemero

(2021). Radical embodiment in two directions. Synthese, 198(9), 2175–2190. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-018-02020-9

Barandiaran

X. E.

Di Paolo

Rohde

(2009). Defining agency: individuality, normativity, asymmetry, and spatio-temporality in action. Adaptive Behavior, 17(5), 367–386. https://doi.org/10.1177/1059712309343819

Chemero

(2003). An outline of a theory of affordances. Ecological Psychology, 15(2), 181–195. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326969eco1502_5

Chemero

(2009). Radical embodied cognitive science. MIT Press.

Costantini

Stapleton

(2016). How the body narrows the interaction with the environment. In Coello

Fischer

M. H.

(Eds.). Foundations of embodied cognition: perceptual and emotional embodiment (pp. 181–197). Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.

Cowley

S. J.

(2011). Distributed language. In Cowley

S. J.

(Ed.). Distributed language (pp. 1–14). John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/bct.34.01cow

Cowley

S. J.

(2019). The return of languaging. Chinese Semiotic Studies, 15(4), 483–512. https://doi.org/10.1515/css-2019-0027

10.

Cuffari

E. C.

Di Paolo

De Jaegher

(2015). From participatory sense-making to language: There and back again. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 14(4), 1089–1125. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11097-014-9404-9

11.

Demuro

Gurney

(2021). Languages/languaging as world-making: the ontological bases of language. Language Sciences, 83, 101307. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2020.101307

12.

Di Paolo

E. A.

(2005). Autopoiesis, adaptivity, teleology, agency. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 4(4), 429–452. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11097-005-9002-y

13.

Di Paolo

E. A.

(2016). Across the uncanny valley: The ecological, the enactive, and the strangely familiar. Constructivist Foundations, 11(2), 327–329.

14.

Di Paolo

Buhrmann

Barandiaran

(2017). Sensorimotor life: An enactive proposal. Oxford University Press.

15.

Di Paolo

E. A.

Cuffari

E. C.

De Jaegher

(2018). Linguistic bodies: The continuity between life and language. MIT press.

16.

Di Paolo

E. A.

De Jaegher

(2021). Enactive ethics: Difference becoming participation (pp. 1–16). Topoi.

17.

Di Paolo

E. A.

Heras-Escribano

Chemero

McGann

(Eds.). (2021). Enaction and ecological psychology: Convergences and complementarities. Frontiers Media SA.

18.

Di Paolo

Thompson

(2014). The enactive approach (pp. 68–78). The Routledge Handbook of Embodied Cognition.

19.

Engstrøm

D. A.

Kelso

J. S.

(2008). Coordination dynamics of the complementary nature. Gestalt Theory, 30, 121–134.

20.

Fultot

Nie

Carello

(2016). Perception-action Mutuality Obviates Mental Construction. Constructivist Foundations, 11(2), 298–307.

21.

Gallagher

(2017). Enactivist interventions: Rethinking the mind. Oxford University Press.

22.

Hollan

Hutchins

Kirsh

(2000). Distributed cognition: toward a new foundation for human-computer interaction research. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI), 7(2), 174–196. https://doi.org/10.1145/353485.353487

23.

Kelso

J. S.

Engstrøm

D. A.

(2006). The complementary nature. MIT press.

24.

Maiese

(2021). Mindshaping, enactivism, and ideological oppression (pp. 1–14). Topoi.

25.

McGann

(2014). Enacting a social ecology: radically embodied intersubjectivity. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 1321. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01321

26.

McGann

(2020). Convergently Emergent: Ecological and Enactive Approaches to the Texture of Agency. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 1982. https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01982

27.

McKinney

(2020). Ecological∼ enactivism through the lens of japanese philosophy. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 1347. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01347

28.

Michaels

C. F.

Palatinus

(2014). A ten commandments for ecological psychology. In Shapiro

(Ed.). The routledge handbook of embodied cognition (pp. 19–28).

29.

Poizat

Flandin

Theureau

(2023). A micro-phenomenological and semiotic approach to cognition in practice: a path toward an integrative approach to studying cognition-in-the-world and from within. Adaptive Behavior, 31(2), 109–125. https://doi.org/10.1177/10597123211072352

30.

Raczaszek-Leonardi

(2009). Symbols as constraints: The structuring role of dynamics and self-organization in natural language. Pragmatics & Cognition, 17(3), 653–676. https://doi.org/10.1075/p&c.17.3.09ras

31.

Rietveld

Kiverstein

(2014). A rich landscape of affordances. Ecological psychology, 26(4), 325–352. https://doi.org/10.1080/10407413.2014.958035

32.

Saito

(2017). Aesthetics of the familiar: Everyday life and world-making. Oxford University Press.

33.

Saussure

F. D.

(1972). Cours de linguistique générale (C. B. e. A. In Sechehaye

L. M.

(Ed.). Édition critique préparée par Tullio De Mauro (edn.). Payot.

34.

Stapleton

(2021). Enacting environments: From umwelts to institutions. In Lai

K. L.

(Ed.). Knowers and knowledge in east-west philosophy (pp. 159–189). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-79349-4_8

35.

Stapleton

Groumpos

Jesse

(2016). Enactivism Embraces Ecological Psychology. Constructivist Foundations, 49(29), 325–328. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2016.11.088

36.

Steffensen

S. V.

(2018). The microecological grounding of language: how linguistic symbolicity extends and transforms the human ecology. In Fill

Penz

(Eds.). The routledge handbook of ecolinguistics (pp. 411–423). Routledge.

37.

Steffensen

S. V.

Cowley

S. J.

(2021). Thinking on behalf of the world: Radical embodied ecolinguistics. In Wen

Taylor

J. R.

(Eds), The routledge handbook of cognitive linguistics (pp. 723–736). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351034708-47

38.

Steffensen

S. V.

Fill

(2014). Ecolinguistics: the state of the art and future horizons. Language Sciences, 41, 6–25. Part A. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2013.08.003

39.

Steffensen

S. V.

Harvey

M. I.

(2018). Ecological meaning, linguistic meaning, and interactivity. Cognitive Semiotics, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1515/cogsem-2018-0005

40.

Steffensen

S. V.

Vallée-Tourangeau

(2016). Cognitive events in a problem-solving pask: A qualitative method for investigating interactivity in the 17 animals problem. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 28(1), 79–105. https://doi.org/10.1080/20445911.2015.1095193

41.

Swenson

Turvey

M. T.

(1991). Thermodynamic Reasons for Perception–action Cycles. Ecological Psychology, 3(4), 317–348. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326969eco0304_2

42.

Theureau

(2020). Distributed cognition and “course of action”. Activités, 17(2), 1–32. https://doi.org/10.4000/activites.5368

43.

Thibault

P. J.

(2021). Distributed languaging, affective dynamics, and the human ecology. Routledge.

44.

Thompson

(2007). Mind in life. Harvard University Press.

45.

Thompson

(2021). What’s in a concept? conceptualizing the nonconceptual in buddhist philosophy and cognitive science, forthcoming. In Coseru

(Ed.). Reasons and empty persons: Mind, metaphysics, and morality: essays in honor of mark siderits. Springer.

46.

Thompson

Stapleton

(2009). Making Sense of Sense-making: Reflections on Enactive and Extended Mind Theories. Topoi, 28(1), 23–30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11245-008-9043-2

47.

Varela

Thompson

Rosch

(1991). The Embodied Mind. MIT Press.

48.

Ward

Stapleton

(2012). Es are good: Cognition as enacted, embodied, embedded, affective and extended. In Paglieri

(Ed.). Consciousness in interaction: the role of the natural and social context in shaping consciousness (pp. 86–89). John Benjamins Publishing Company.