In this article, I aim to elucidate minimality in cooperation by drawing on a previously developed multi-dimensional approach to cooperation. This approach provides a useful framework to locate any cooperative phenomenon at a specific point on the continua of different dimensions. That point, in turn, determines the criteria for a particular cooperative phenomenon to emerge. Thus, on one hand, the analysis provides a contribution to the philosophical debate on minimal cooperation by elucidating different kinds of minimalism in cooperation that are characterized by the lowest point of the continua of either dimension, including (1) cognitive minimalism, (2) behavioural minimalism, (3) affective minimalism, (4) social minimalism and (5) contextual minimalism. On the other hand, it facilitates the dialogue among disciplines insofar as it helps determining whether the skills and capacities that are required for particular cooperative activities (e.g. cooperative games like the Joint Simon task or the prisoner’s dilemma) are not only present in typically developing individuals but also individuals with developmental disorders like autism. Drawing on an externalist/internalist distinction, the analysis shows that high-functioning individuals with autism perform particularly well in cooperative activities that amount to externalism and are highly defined by an institutional context, social rules and regularities as well as the roles of the agents.
AljuniedM.FredericksonN. (2011). Does central coherence relate to the cognitive performance of children with autism in dynamic assessments?Autism, 17, 172–183.
2.
Baron-CohenS. (1995). Mindblindness: An Essay on Autism and Theory of Mind. Cambridge: MIT Press.
3.
Baron-CohenS.WheelwrightS. (2004). The empathy quotient: An investigation of adults with Asperger syndrome or high-functioning autism, and normal sex differences. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 34(2), 163–175.
4.
Baron-CohenS.LeslieA. M.FrithU. (1985). Does the autistic child have a ‘theory of mind’?Cognition, 21, 37–46.
5.
BirminghamE.StanleyD.NairR.AdolphsR. (2015). Implicit social biases in people with autism. Psychological Science, 26, 1693–1705.
6.
Bottema-BeutelK. (2017). Glimpses into the blind spot: Social interaction and autism. Journal of Communication Disorders, 68, 24–34.
7.
BratmanM. E. (1993). Shared intention. Ethics, 104(1), 97–113.
8.
BratmanM. E. (2014). Shared agency. A planning theory of acting together. Oxford University Press.
9.
ButterfillS. (2012). Joint action and development. Philosophical Quarterly, 62, 23–47.
10.
ButterfillS.PacherieE. (2020). Towards a Blueprint for a Social Animal. In FiebichA. (Ed.), Minimal Cooperation and Shared Agency (pp. 111–126). Cham: Springer.
11.
CarpenterM.PenningtonB. F.RogersS. J. (2001). Understanding of others’ intentions in children with autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 31(6), 589–599.
12.
ChisholmR. (1969). Some puzzles about agency. In LambertK. (Ed.), The logical way of doing things (pp. 199–217). Yale University Press.
13.
ColombiC.LiebalK.TomaselloM.YoungG.WarnekenF.RogersS. J. (2009). Examining correlates of cooperation in autism: Imitation, joint attention, and understanding intentions. Autism, 13(2), 143–163.
14.
ColzatoL. S.ZechH.HommelB.VerdonschotR.van den WildenbergW. P. M.HsiehS. (2012). Loving-kindness brings loving-kindness: The impact of Buddhism on cognitive self-other integration. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 19, 541–545.
15.
CurioniA.Minio-PaluelloI.SacheliL. M.AgliotiS. M. (2017). Autistic traits affect interpersonal motor coordination by modulating strategic use. Molecular Autism, 8(23), 1–13.
16.
CusackJ. P.WilliamsJ. H. G.NeriP. (2015). Action perception is intact in autism spectrum disorder. The Journal of Neuroscience, 35(5), 1849–1857.
17.
de BoerR. J.Badke-SchaubP. (2008). Emotional alignment in teams: how emotions support the design process. In Proceedings of international design conference - Design 2008, Dubrovnik, Korsika, pp.179–186.
18.
DolkT.HommelB.ColzatoL. S.Schütz-BosbachS.PrinzW.LiepeltR. (2014). The joint Simon effect: A review and theoretical integration. Frontiers in Psychology, 5(974), 1–10.
19.
DolkT.HommelB.PrinzW.LiepeltR. (2013). The (not so) social Simon Effect: A referential coding account. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 39, 1248–1260.
20.
DownsA.SmithT. (2004). Emotional understanding, cooperation, and social behavior in high-functioning children with autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 34(6), 625–635.
21.
FantasiaV.de JaegherH.FasuloA. (2014). We can work it out: An enactive look at cooperation. Frontiers in Psychology, 5(874), 1–11.
22.
FeinE. (2015). Making meaningful worlds: Role-playing subcultures and the autism spectrum. Culture, Medicine and Psychiatry, 39, 299–321.
23.
FiebichA. (2019). Social cognition, empathy, and agent-specificities in cooperation. Topoi, 38(1), 163–172.
FiebichA.*SchwarzkopfS.NgyuenN*. (2015, *equal contribution). Cooperation with robots? A two-dimensional approach. In MisselhornC. (Ed.), Collective agency and cooperation in natural and artificial systems. Heidelberg: Springer.
26.
FiebichA. (2018). Three dimensions in human-robot cooperation. In CoeckelberghM.FunckJ.Seibt NorskovM. (Eds.), Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications: Envisioning robots in society – Power, politics, and public space, proceedings of robophilosophy 2018/TRANSOR 2018 (pp. 147–155). IOS Press.
27.
FiebichA. (2020). Minimal cooperation (editorial introduction). In FiebichA. (Ed.), Minimal cooperation and shared agency (pp.1–8). Springer Series “The Philosophy of Sociality”. Springer.
28.
FisherN.HappéF. (2005). A training study of theory of mind and executive function in children with autistic spectrum disorder. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorder, 35(6), 757–771.
29.
FordR. M.AberdeinB. (2015). Exploring social influences on the joint Simon task: Empathy and friendship. Frontiers in Psychology, 6(962), 1–11.
FrithU. (2004). Emanuel Miller lecture: Confusions and controversies about Asperger Syndrome. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 45(4), 672–686.
32.
GallagherS. (2020). What in the world: Conversation and things in context. In FiebichA. (Ed.), The philosophy of sociality: Minimal cooperation and shared agency (pp. 59–70). Cham: Springer.
33.
GilbertM. (2009). Shared intention and personal intentions. Philosophical Studies, 144, 167–187.
34.
GilbertM. (2013). Joint commitment: How we make the social world. Oxford University Press.
35.
GuagnanoD.RusconiE.UmiltàC. A. (2010). Sharing a task or sharing space? On the effect of the confederate in action coding in a detection task. Cognition, 114, 348–355.
36.
GualaF. (2020). Solving the Hi-Lo paradox: Equilibria, beliefs, and coordination. In FiebichA. (Ed.), The philosophy of sociality: Minimal cooperation and shared agency (pp. 149–168). Cham: Springer.
37.
HamiltonA. F.BrindleyR.FrithU. (2007). Imitation and action understanding in autistic spectrum disorders: How valid is the hypothesis of a deficit in the mirror neuron system?Neuropsychologia, 45, 1859–1868.
38.
HirschfeldL.BartmessE.WhiteS.FrithU. (2007). Can autistic children predict behavior by social stereotypes?Current Biology, 17(12), R451–R452.
39.
HumphreysG. W.BedfordJ. (2011). The relations between joint action and theory of mind: A neuropsychological analysis. Experimental Brain Research, 211, 357–369.
40.
JarroldC. (2003). A review of research into pretend play in autism. Autism, 7(4), 379–390.
41.
KennettJ. (2002). Autism, empathy, and moral agency. The Philosophical Quarterly, 52(208), 340–357.
42.
KruegerJ. (2015). The affective ‘we’: Self-regulation and shared emotions. In SzantoT.MoranD. (Eds.), The phenomenology of sociality: Discovering the ‘we’ (pp. 263–277). Routledge.
43.
LiJ.ZhuL.GummerumM. (2014). The relationship between moral judgment and cooperation in children with high-functioning autism. Scientific Reports, 4(4314), 1–6.
44.
LiJ.ZhuL.LiuJ.LiX. (2014). Social and non-social deficits in children with high-functioning autism and their cooperative behaviors. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 8, 1657–1671.
45.
LiebalK.ColombiC.RogersS. J.WarnekenF.TomaselloM. (2008). Helping and cooperation in children with autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorder, 38, 224–238.
OzonoffS.MillerJ. N. (1995). Teaching theory of mind: A new approach to social skills training for individuals with autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 25(4), 415–433.
53.
PaternotteC. (2020). Joint action: Why so minimal? In FiebichA. (Ed.), The philosophy of sociality: Minimal cooperation and shared agency (pp. 41–58). Cham: Springer.
54.
RitchieK. (2013). What are groups?Philosophical Studies, 166(2), 257–272.
55.
RitchieK. (2020). Minimal cooperation and group roles. In FiebichA. (Ed.), The philosophy of sociality: Minimal cooperation and shared agency (pp. 93–110). Cham: Springer.
56.
RumpK. M.JoyceL. G.MinshewN. J.StraussM. S. (2009). The development of emotion recognition in individuals with autism. Child Development, 80(5), 1434–1447.
57.
SallyD.HillE. (2006). The development of interpersonal strategy: Autism, theory-of-mind, cooperation and fairness. Journal of Economic Psychology, 27, 73–97.
58.
SchilbachL.TimmermansB.ReddyV.CostallA.BenteG.SchlichtT.VogeleyK. (2013). Towards a second-person neuroscience. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 36(4), 393–414.
59.
SearleJ. (1990). Collective intentions and actions. In CohenP.MorganJ.PollackM. (Eds.), Intentions in communication (pp. 401–415). MIT Press.
60.
SearleJ. (2010). Making the social world. Oxford University Press.
61.
SebanzN.BekkeringH.KnoblichG. (2006). Joint action: Bodies and minds moving together. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10(2), 70–76.
62.
SebanzN.GüntherK.StrumpfL.PrinzW. (2005). Far from action-blind: Representation of others’ actions in individuals with autism. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 22(3/4), 433–454.
63.
SebanzN.KnoblichG.PrinzW. (2003). Representing others’ actions: Just like one’s own?Cognition, 88, B11–B21.
64.
SebanzN.KnoblichG.PrinzW.WascherE. (2006). Twin peaks: An ERP study of action planning and control in co-acting individuals. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 18(5), 859–870.
65.
SenjuA. (2012). Spontaneous theory of mind and its absence in autism spectrum disorders. The Neuroscientist, 18, 108–113.
66.
ShafaeiR.BahramiB.Vaziri-PashkamM. (2019). Effects of perceived interpersonal closeness on the joint Simon effect in adolescents and adults. PsyArhiv Preprints. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/da6gb
67.
SigmanM. D.KasariC.KwonJ.-H.YirmiyaN. (1992). Responses to the negative emotions of others by autistic, mentally retarded, and normal children. Child Development, 63(4), 796–807.
68.
SmithM. J. L.MontagneB.PerrettD. I.GillM.GallagherL. (2010). Detecting subtle facial emotion recognition deficits in high-functioning Autism using dynamic stimuli of varying intensities. Neuropsychologia, 48, 2777–2781.
69.
SouthgateV.SenjuA.CsibraG. (2007). Action anticipation through attribution of false belief by 2-year-olds. Psychological Science, 18(7), 587–592.
70.
SterponiL.de KirbyK. (2016). A multidimensional reappraisal of language in autism: Insights from a discourse analytic study. Journal of Autism Developmental Disorder, 46, 394–405.
71.
SterponiL.de KirbyK.ShankeyJ. (2015). Rethinking language in autism. Autism, 19(5), 517–526.
72.
TayamaM.TatenoM.ParkT. W.UkaiW.HashimotoE.SaitoT. (2012). The study of cognitive characteristics in Asperger’s disorder by using a modified prisoner’s dilemma game with a variable payoff matrix. PLoS ONE, 7(11), Article e48794.
73.
TollefsenD. (2005). Let’s pretend! Joint action and young children. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 35, 75–97.
74.
TomaselloM.CarpenterM.CallJ.BehneT.MollH. (2005). Understanding and sharing intentions: The origins of cultural cognition. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 28, 675–735.
75.
TuomelaR. (2010). The philosophy of sociality: The shared point of view. Oxford University Press.
76.
VermeulenP. (2012). Autism as context blindness. AACC Publishing.
77.
VesperC.ButterfillS.KnoblichG.SebanzN. (2010). A minimal architecture for joint action. Neural Networks, 23(8–9), 998–1003.
78.
WellmanH. M.CrossD.WatsonJ. (2001). Meta-analysis of theory-of-mind development: The truth about false belief. Child Development, 72, 655–684.
79.
ZahaviD. (2014). Self and other: Exploring subjectivity, empathy, and shame. Oxford University Press.
80.
ZahaviD.ParnasJ. (2003). Conceptual problems in infantile autism research: Why cognitive science needs phenomenology. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 10(9–10), 53–71.
