As a mechanism for survival, quadrupeds have obtained skills involving coordination between limbs and the body (i.e. body–limb coordination), providing fast and adaptive locomotion compared with motion using only limbs. Several bio-inspired robotics studies have resulted in the development of legged robots that utilize a flexible spine, similar to cheetahs. However, the control principle of body–limb coordination has not been established to date. From the perspective of a decentralized control scheme, a minimal body–limb coordination mechanism is proposed in this study, in which body parts aid each other via a sensory feedback mechanism. The two-dimensional simulation and hardware experiments reveal that bilateral sensory feedback between limbs and body is essential for the robot to adaptively generate a body–limb coordination pattern and achieve faster locomotion speed than that by only limbs in efficient manner.
AlexanderR. M. (2002). Tendon elasticity and muscle function. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part A: Molecular & Integrative Physiology, 133, 1001–1011.
2.
BertramJ. E.GutmannA. (2008). Motions of the running horse and cheetah revisited: Fundamental mechanics of the transverse and rotary gallop. Journal of the Royal Society, Interface: The Royal Society, 6, 549–559.
3.
BiancardiC. M.MinettiA. E. (2012). Biomechanical determinants of transverse and rotary gallop in cursorial mammals. The Journal of Experimental Biology, 215, 4144–4156.
4.
CaoQ.PoulakakisI. (2016). Quadrupedal running with a flexible torso: Control and speed transitions with sums-of-squares verification. Artificial Life and Robotics, 21, 384–392.
5.
CatavitelloG.LvanenkoY. P.LacquanitiF. (2015). Planar covariation of hindlimb and forelimb elevation angles during terrestrial and aquatic locomotion of dogs. PLoS ONE, 10, e0133936.
6.
ChenD.LiN.WangH.ChenL. (2017). Effect of flexible spine motion on energy efficiency in quadruped running. Journal of Bionic Engineering, 14, 716–725.
7.
ÇulhaU.SaranliU. (2011). Quadrupedal bounding with an actuated spinal joint. In Proceedings of the 2011 IEEE international conference on robotics and automation (pp. 1392–1397). New York, NY: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers.
8.
DengQ.WangS.XuW.MoJ.LiangQ. (2012). Quasi passive bounding of a quadruped model with articulated spine. Mechanism and Machine Theory, 52, 232–242.
9.
DuperretJ.KoditschekD. E. (2017). Empirical validation of a spined sagittal-plane quadrupedal model. In Proceedings of the 2017 IEEE international conference on robotics and automation (ICRA) (pp. 1058–1064). New York, NY: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers.
10.
EckertP.SpröwitzA.WitteH.IjspeertA. J. (2015). Comparing the effect of different spine and leg designs for a small bounding quadruped robot. In Proceedings of the 2015 IEEE international conference on robotics and automation (ICRA) (pp. 3128–3133). New York, NY: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers.
11.
FukuokaY.KimuraH. (2009). Dynamic locomotion of a biomorphic quadruped “Tekken” robot using various gaits: Walk, trot, free-gait and bound. Applied Bionics and Biomechanics, 6, 63–71.
12.
GabrielliG.KármánT. V. (1950). What price speed? Specific power required for propulsion of vehicles. Mechanical Engineering, 72, 775–781.
13.
GrillnerS. (1975). Locomotion in vertebrates: Central mechanisms and reflex interaction. Physiological Review, 55, 247–304.
14.
HildebrandM. (1961). Further studies on locomotion of the cheetah. Journal of Mammalogy, 42, 84–91.
15.
IidaF.PfeiferR. (2004). “Cheap” rapid locomotion of a quadruped robot: Self-stabilization of bounding gait. In Proceedings of the 8th international conference on intelligent autonomous systems (IAS) (pp. 642–649). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Intelligent Autonomous Systems.
16.
KawasakiR.SatoR.KazamaE.MingA.ShimojoM. (2016). Development of a flexible coupled spine mechanism for a small quadruped robot. In Proceedings of the 2016 IEEE international conference on robotics and biomimetics (ROBIO) (pp. 71–76). New York, NY: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers.
17.
KhoramshahiM.BidgolyH. J.ShafieeS.AsaeiA.IjspeertA. J.AhmadabadiM. N. (2013a). Piecewise linear spine for speed-energy efficiency trade-off in quadruped robots. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 61, 1350–1359.
18.
KhoramshahiM.SpröwitzA.AhmadabadiM. N.IjspeertA. J. (2013). Benefits of an active spine supported bounding locomotion with a small compliant quadruped robot. In Proceedings of the 2013 IEEE international conference on robotics and automation (pp. 3329–3334). New York, NY: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers.
19.
KimY. L.ParkJ.YoonB.KimK. S.KimS. (2014). The role of relative spinal motion during feline galloping for speed performance. Journal of Bionic Engineering, 11, 517–528.
20.
MaesL. D.HerbinM.HackertR.BelsV. L.AbourachidA. (2008). Steady locomotion in dogs: Temporal and associated spatial coordination patterns and the effect of speed. The Journal of Experimental Biology, 211, 138–149.
21.
NariokaK.RosendoA.SpröwitzA.HosodaK. (2012). Development of a minimalistic pneumatic quadruped robot for fast locomotion. In Proceedings of the 2012 IEEE international conference on robotics and biomimetics (ROBIO) (pp. 307–311). New York, NY: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers.
22.
NishiiJ.OgawaK.SuzukiR. (1998). The optimal gait pattern in hexapods based on energetic efficiency. In Proceedings of the 3rd international symposium on artificial life and robotics (pp. 106–109). Tokyo, Japan: Springer.
23.
OwakiD.IshiguroA. (2017). A quadruped robot exhibiting spontaneous gait transitions from walking to trotting to galloping. Scientific Reports, 7, 277. doi:10.1038/s41598-017-00348-9.
24.
OwakiD.KanoT.NagasawaK.TeroA.IshiguroA. (2013). Simple robot suggests physical interlimb communication is essential for quadruped walking. Journal of the Royal Society, Interface: The Royal Society, 10, 0669.
25.
PapadopoulosD.BuehlerM. (2000). Stable running in a quadruped robot with compliant legs. In Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on robotics and automation (ICRA) (pp. 444–449). New York, NY: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers.
26.
PouyaS.KhodabakhshM.SpröwitzA.IjspeertA. J. (2017). Spinal joint compliance and actuation in a simulated bounding quadruped robot. Autonomous Robots, 41, 437–452.
27.
RaibertM. H.ChepponisM.BrownH. B.Jr. (1986). Running on four legs as though they were one. IEEE Journal of Robotics and Automation, 2, 70–82.
28.
SchillingN.HackertR. (2006). Sagittal spine movements of small therian mammals during asymmetrical gaits. The Journal of Experimental Biology, 209, 3925–3939.
29.
SchillingN.CarrierD. R. (2010). Function of the epaxial muscles in walking, trotting and galloping dogs: Implications for the evolution of epaxial muscle function in tetrapods. The Journal of Experimental Biology, 213, 1490–1502.
30.
SeokS.WangA.ChuahM. Y.OttenD.LangJ.KimS. (2013). Design principles for highly efficient quadrupeds and implementation on the MIT cheetah robot. In Proceedings of the 2013 IEEE international conference on robotics and automation (pp. 3307–3312). New York, NY: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers.
31.
SpröwitzA.TuleuA.VespignaniM.AjallooeianM.BadriE.IjspeertA. J. (2013). Towards dynamic trot gait locomotion: Design, control, and experiments with Cheetah-cub, a compliant quadruped robot. International Journal of Robotics Research, 32, 932–950.
32.
SuzukiS.FukuharaA.OwakiD.KanoT.IjspeertA. J.IshiguroA. (2017a, June27–30). A minimal model for body-limb coordination in quadruped locomotion. Paper presented at the 8th International Symposium on Adaptive Motion of Animals and Machines, Sapporo, Japan.
33.
SuzukiS.FukuharaA.OwakiD.KanoT.IjspeertA. J.IshiguroA. (2017b). A simple body-limb coordination model that mimics primitive tetrapod walking. In Proceedings of the 2017 56th annual conference of the society of instrument and control engineers of Japan (SICE) (pp. 12–14). New York, NY: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers.
34.
WangC.WangS. (2016). Bionic control of cheetah bounding with a segmented spine. Applied Bionics and Biomechanics, 2016, 5031586.
35.
WangC.ZhangT.WeiX.LongY.WangS. (2017). Dynamic characteristics and stability criterion of rotary galloping gait with an articulated passive spine joint. Advanced Robotics, 31, 168–183.
36.
WeiX.LongY.WangC.WangS. (2015). Rotary galloping with a lock-unlock elastic spinal joint. Journal of Mechanical Engineering Science, 229, 1088–1102.
37.
ZhaoQ.NakajimaK.SumiokaH.YuX.PfeiferR. (2012). Embodiment enables the spinal engine in quadruped robot locomotion. In Proceedings of the 2012 IEEE/RSJ international conference on intelligent robots and systems (pp. 2449–2456). New York, NY: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
