I investigate some aspects of the structure of the production of drawings by developing a practice-based phenomenology articulated around some “drawing problems.” The examples I chose cluster around decision making in drawing from life. I make a case for a propositional, explicit judgment-based action structure that makes it possible to accommodate some typical practices used in addressing drawing problems. I further hint to by-products (e.g. attention modulation) and “surrounding practices” (e.g. communication during the observation of a drawing activity) that find a plausible explanation in the propositional account of drawing.
CasatiR. (2017). Review of resemblance and representation: An essay in the philosophy of pictures, by Ben Blumson. Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 95, 603–606. doi:10.1080/00048402.2016.1207691
6.
CavanaghP. (1999). Pictorial art and vision. In WilsonR. A.KeilF. C. (Eds.), MIT encyclopedia of the cognitive science (pp. 648–651). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
7.
CristianoG. (2017). Il visualizer [The visualizer]. Napoli, Italy: Caracò.
8.
KennedyJ. M. (1974). Psychology of picture perception. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
9.
KennedyJ. M. (1975, September4). Drawing was discovered, not invented. New Scientist, 67(965), 523–525.
10.
MaynardP. (2005). Drawing distinctions: The varieties of graphic expression. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
11.
PignocchiA. (2008). Les intentions du dessinateur. Un cas d’étude à l’interface entre la philosophie de l’art et les sciences cognitives [The intentions of the draftsman: A case study at the interface between philosophy of art and cognitive sciences] (Thèse de Doctorat, EHESS). Retrieved from http://www.theses.fr/2008EHES0008
12.
PignocchiA. (2010). How the intentions of the draftsman shape perception of a drawing. Consciousness and Cognition, 19, 887–898. doi:10.1016/j.concog.2010.04.009
13.
RoyerM. (2015). De l’instrument à la prothèse: ethnographie de trajectoires d’objets biotechnologiques en cancérologie [From instrument to prosthesis: Ethnography of biotechnological object trajectories in cancer therapy] (Thèse de doctorat, EHESS). Retrieved from http://www.theses.fr/2015EHES0685#
14.
SperberD.HirschfeldL. A. (2004). The cognitive foundations of cultural stability and diversity. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8, 40–46.
15.
StanovichK. E.WestR. F. (2000). Individual difference in reasoning: Implications for the rationality debate?Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 23, 645–726.
16.
Van SommersP. (1984). Drawing and cognition: Descriptive and experimental studies of graphic production processes. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
