This study aimed to provide a basic description of the motor control strategy during bimanual isometric force control in healthy young adults. Thirty healthy young adults (mean age: 27.4 ± 3.7 years) participated in the study. The subjects were instructed to press both hands simultaneously to match the target force level of 5%, 25%, and 50% bimanual maximum voluntary force using continuous visual feedback. Bimanual motor synergy and bimanual coordination, as well as force asymmetry, force accuracy, and force variability were compared. This study identified the specific motor control strategy of healthy young adults during bimanual isometric force control, indicating that they proportionally increased “good” and “bad” variabilities, resulting in comparable bimanual motor synergy as the target force level increased.
BawejaH. S.PatelB. K.MartinkewizJ. D.VuJ.ChristouE. A. (2009). Removal of visual feedback alters muscle activity and reduces force variability during constant isometric contractions. Experimental Brain Research, 197, 35–47.
2.
CauraughJ. H.LodhaN.NaikS. K.SummersJ. J. (2010). Bilateral movement training and stroke motor recovery progress: A structured review and meta-analysis. Human Movement Science, 29, 853–870.
3.
DavisN. J. (2007). Memory and coordination in bimanual isometric finger force production. Experimental Brain Research, 182, 137–142.
4.
de FreitasP.KrishnanV.JaricS. (2008). Force coordination in object manipulation. Journal of Human Kinetics20, 37–50.
5.
DiedrichsenJ.HazeltineE.NurssW. K.IvryR. B. (2003). The role of the corpus callosum in the coupling of bimanual isometric force pulses. Journal of Neurophysiology, 90, 2409–2418.
6.
GalganskiM. E.FuglevandA. J.EnokaR. M. (1993). Reduced control of motor output in a human hand muscle of elderly subjects during submaximal contractions. Journal of Neurophysiology, 69, 2108–2115.
7.
GoldenbergM. S.YackH. J.CernyF. J.BurtonH. W. (1991). Acoustic myography as an indicator of force during sustained contractions of a small hand muscle. Journal of Applied Physiology, 70, 87–91.
8.
GooijersJ.SwinnenS. P. (2014). Interactions between brain structure and behavior: The corpus callosum and bimanual coordination. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 43, 1–19.
9.
HarrisonS. J.StergiouN. (2015). Complex adaptive behavior and dexterous action. Nonlinear Dynamics, Psychology, and Life Sciences, 19, 345–394.
10.
HuX.LoncharichM.NewellK. M. (2011). Visual information interacts with neuromuscular factors in the coordination of bimanual isometric force. Experimental Brain Research, 209, 129–138.
11.
HuX.NewellK. M. (2011a). Adaptation to bimanual asymmetric weights in isometric force coordination. Neuroscience Letters, 490, 121–125.
12.
HuX.NewellK. M. (2011b). Aging, visual information, and adaptation to task asymmetry in bimanual force coordination. Journal of Applied Physiology 1985, 111, 1671–1680.
13.
KangN.CauraughJ. H. (2014a). Force control improvements in chronic stroke: Bimanual coordination and motor synergy evidence after coupled bimanual movement training. Experimental Brain Research, 232, 503–513.
14.
KangN.CauraughJ. H. (2014b). Bimanual force variability and chronic stroke: Asymmetrical hand control. PLoS ONE, 9, e101817.
15.
KangN.CauraughJ. H. (2017). Bilateral synergy as an index of force coordination in chronic stroke. Experimental Brain Research, 235, 1501–1509.
16.
KennedyD. M.BoyleJ. B.WangC.SheaC. H. (2016). Bimanual force control: Cooperation and interference?Psychological Research, 80, 34–54.
17.
KimY.KimW. S.ShimJ. K.SuhD. W.KimT.YoonB. (2015). Difference of motor overflow depending on the impaired or unimpaired hand in stroke patients. Human Movement Science, 39, 154–162.
18.
KimY.KimW. S.YoonB. (2014). The effect of stroke on motor selectivity for force control in single- and multi-finger force production tasks. Neurorehabilitation, 34, 429–435.
19.
LatashM. L. (2008). Synergy. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
20.
LatashM. L. (2010a). Motor synergies and the equilibrium-point hypothesis. Motor Control, 14, 294–322.
21.
LatashM. L. (2010b). Stages in learning motor synergies: A view based on the equilibrium-point hypothesis. Human Movement Science, 29, 642–654.
22.
LeeT. D.AlmeidaQ. J.ChuaR. (2002). Spatial constraints in bimanual coordination: Influences of effector orientation. Experimental Brain Research, 146, 205–212.
23.
LodhaN.CoombesS. A.CauraughJ. H. (2012). Bimanual isometric force control: Asymmetry and coordination evidence post stroke. Clinical Neurophysiology, 123, 787–795.
24.
LodhaN.PattenC.CoombesS. A.CauraughJ. H. (2012). Bimanual force control strategies in chronic stroke: Finger extension versus power grip. Neuropsychologia, 50, 2536–2545.
25.
NewellK. (1986). Constraints on the development of coordination. In WadeM. G.WhitingH. T. A. (Eds.), Motor development in children: Aspects of coordination and control (pp. 341–360). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Martinus Nijhoff.
26.
OforiE.SamsonJ. M.SosnoffJ. J. (2010). Age-related differences in force variability and visual display. Experimental Brain Research, 203, 299–306.
27.
OldfieldR. C. (1971). The assessment and analysis of handedness: The Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia, 9, 97–113.
28.
OliveiraF. T. P.IvryR. B. (2008). The representation of action: Insights from bimanual coordination. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 17, 130–135.
29.
OnneweerB.MuggeW.SchoutenA. C. (2013, April14–18). Human force reproduction error depends upon force level. Paper presented at the World Haptics Conference (WHC, 2013), Daejeon, Korea.
30.
RanganathanR.NewellK. M. (2008a). Motor synergies: Feedback and error compensation within and between trials. Experimental Brain Research, 186, 561–570.
31.
RanganathanR.NewellK. M. (2008b). Online feedback and the regulation of degrees of freedom in motor control. Human Movement Science, 27, 577–5x89.
32.
RosenbaumD. A.DawsonA. M.ChallisJ. H. (2006). Haptic tracking permits bimanual independence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 32, 1266–1275.
33.
SeoN. J. (2013). Involuntary contralateral upper extremity muscle activation pattern during unilateral pinch grip following stroke. Journal of Hand Therapy, 26, 272–277, quiz 278.
34.
SerrienD. J.WiesendangerM. (2001). Dissociation of grip/load-force coupling during a bimanual manipulative assignment. Experimental Brain Research, 136, 417–420.
35.
SherwoodD. E. (1994). Hand preference, practice order, and spatial assimilations in rapid bimanual movement. Journal of Motor Behavior, 26, 123–143.
36.
SlifkinA. B.NewellK. M. (1999). Noise, information transmission, and force variability. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25, 837–851.
37.
SlifkinA. B.VaillancourtD. E.NewellK. M. (2000). Intermittency in the control of continuous force production. Journal of Neurophysiology, 84, 1708–1718.
38.
Smits-EngelsmanB. C.KlingelsK.FeysH. (2011). Bimanual force coordination in children with spastic unilateral cerebral palsy. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 32, 2011–2019.
39.
SosnoffJ. J.NewellK. M. (2005). Intermittent visual information and the multiple time scales of visual motor control of continuous isometric force production. Perception & Psychophysics, 67, 335–344.
40.
SummersJ. J.RosenbaumD. A.BurnsB. D.FordS. K. (1993). Production of polyrhythms. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 19, 416–428.
41.
ThickbroomG. W.PhillipsB. A.MorrisI.ByrnesM. L.MastagliaF. L. (1998). Isometric force-related activity in sensorimotor cortex measured with functional MRI. Experimental Brain Research, 121, 59–64.
42.
van DuinenH.RenkenR.MauritsN. M.ZijdewindI. (2008). Relation between muscle and brain activity during isometric contractions of the first dorsal interosseus muscle. Human Brain Mapping, 29, 281–299.
43.
WuY. H.PazinN.ZatsiorskyV. M.LatashM. L. (2013). Improving finger coordination in young and elderly persons. Experimental Brain Research, 226, 273–283.
