Time perception has been typically investigated from cognitivism and internalist approaches. In this opinion, I sketch an outline to suggest how time experience is constituted on the subjective interactions with the sociomaterial environment. For this purpose, I suggest that a 4E approach can answer better such issues.
BeatonM. (2013). Phenomenology and embodied action. Constructivist Foundations, 8, 298–313.
2.
BeatonM. (2016). Sensorimotor direct realism: How we enact our world. Constructivist Foundations, 11, 265–276.
3.
BlockR. A.GrondinS. (2014). Timing and time perception: A selective review and commentary on recent reviews. Frontiers in Psychology, 628, 1–3.
4.
BlockR. A.HancockP. A.ZakayD. (2000). Sex differences in duration judgments: A meta-analytic review. Memory & Cognition, 28, 1333–1346. doi:10.3758/ BF03211834
5.
CallenderC. (2010). Is time an illusion?Scientific American Mind, 302, 58–65. doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0610-58
6.
ChemeroA. (2009). Radical embodied cognitive science. London, England: The MIT Press.
7.
ClarkA. (2008). Supersizing the mind: Embodiment, action, and cognitive extension. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
8.
Di PaoloE.BuhrmannT. Y.BarandiaranX. (2017). Sensorimotor life: An enactive proposal. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
9.
Droit-VoletS.GilS. (2009). The time-emotion paradox. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series B, Biological Sciences, 364, 1943–1953. doi:10.1098/rstb.2009.0013
10.
Droit-VoletS.ZélantiP. S. (2013). Development of time sensitivity and information processing speed. PLoS ONE, 8, e71424. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0071424
11.
GallagherS.MartinezS.GastelumM. (2017). Action-space and time: Towards an enactive hermeneutics. In BruceJ. (Ed.), Place, space and hermeneutics (pp. 83–96). Basel, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.
12.
GibbonJ.ChurchR. M.MeckW. H. (1984). Scalar timing in memory. In GibbonJ.AllanL. (Eds.), Timing and time perception (pp. 52–77). Nueva York, NY: Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.
13.
GibsonJ. J. (1975). Events are perceivable but time is not. In FraserJ. T.LawrenceY. N. (Eds.), The study of time II (pp. 295–301). Nueva York, NY: Springer-Verlag.
14.
JamesW. (1890). The principles of psychology (Vols. 1 and 2). New York, NY: Henry Holt and Company.
15.
KruegerJ. (2018). Music as affective scaffolding. In ClarkeD.HerbertR.ClarkeE. (Eds.), Music and consciousness II. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, forthcoming.
MatthewsW. J.MeckW. H. (2016). Temporal cognition: Connecting subjective time to perception, attention, and memory. Psychological Bulletin, 142, 865–907. doi:10.1037/bul0000045
18.
MenaryR. (Ed.). (2010). The extended mind. Cambridge, MA: Bradford Books.
19.
MerchantH.HarringtonD. L.MeckW. H. (2013). Neural basis of the perception and estimation of time. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 36, 313–336. doi:10.1146/annurev-neuro-062012-170349
20.
O’ReganK.NoëA. (2001). A sensorimotor account of vision and visual consciousness. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24, 939–1031.
21.
RietveldE.KiversteinJ. (2014). A rich landscape of affordances. Ecological Psychology, 26, 325–352. doi:10.1080/10407413.2014.958035
22.
ShotterJ. (1983). Duality of structure and intentionality in an ecological psychology. Journal for the Theory of Social Behavior, 13, 19–43.
23.
Van DijkL.WithagenR. (2016). Temporalizing agency: Moving beyond on- and offline cognition. Theory & Psychology, 26(1), 5–26.
24.
VarelaF. J. (1999). The specious present: A neurophenomenology of time consciousness. In PetitotJ.VarelaF. J.PachoudB.RoyJ.-M. (Eds.), Naturalizing phenomenology: Issues in contemporary phenomenology and cognitive science (pp. 266–329). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
25.
WittmannM. (2013). The inner sense of time: How the brain creates a representation of duration. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 14, 217–223. doi:10.1038/nrn3452
