Post-cognitive approaches to cognitive science, such as enactivism and autopoietic theory, are typically assumed to involve the rejection of computationalism. We will argue that this assumption results from the conflation of computation with the notion of representation, which is ruled out by the post-cognitivist rejection of cognitive realism. However, certain theories of computation need not invoke representation, and are not committed to cognitive realism, meaning that post-cognitivism need not necessarily imply anti-computationalism. Finally, we will demonstrate that autopoietic theory shares a mechanistic foundation with these theories of computation, and is therefore well-equipped to take advantage of these theories.
BarandiaranX. E. (2016). Autonomy and enactivism: Towards a theory of sensorimotor autonomous agency. Topoi. Advance online publication. doi:10.1007/s11245-016-9365-4
2.
BechtelW.RichardsonR. C. (2010). Discovering complexity: Decomposition and localization as strategies in scientific research (2nd ed.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press/Bradford Books.
3.
CárdenasM. L.LetelierJ. C.GutierrezC.Cornish-BowdenA.Soto-AndradeJ. (2010). Closure to efficient causation, computability and artificial life. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 263, 79–92.
4.
ChalmersD. (2011). A computational foundation for the study of cognition. Journal of Cognitive Science, 12, 323–357.
5.
CraverC. (2013). Functions and mechanisms: A perspectivalist view. In HunemanP. (Ed.), Functions (pp. 133–158). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
Di PaoloE. A. (2005). Autopoiesis, adaptivity, teleology, agency. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 44, 429–452. doi:10.1007/s11097-005-9002-y
10.
FodorJ. A. (1975). The language of thought. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
11.
FodorJ. A. (1981). Representations. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
12.
FrescoN. (2014). Physical computation and cognitive science. Berlin, Germany: Springer.
13.
FroeseT. (2011). From second-order cybernetics to enactive cognitive science: Varela’s turn from epistemology to phenomenology. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 28, 631–645.
14.
FroeseT. (2012). From adaptive behaviour to human cognition: A review of Enaction. Adaptive Behavior, 20, 209–221.
15.
FroeseT.Di PaoloE. A. (2011). The enactive approach: Theoretical sketches from cell to society. Pragmatics & Cognition, 19(1), 1–36. doi:10.1075/pc.19.1.01fro
16.
GomilaT.CalvoP. (2008). Directions for an embodied cognitive science: Toward an integrated approach. In CalvoP.GomilaT. (Eds.), Handbook of cognitive science. An embodied approach (pp. 1–25). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier.
17.
HaugelandJ. (1978). The nature and plausibility of cognitivism. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 2, 215–260.
LetelierJ. C.MarínG.MpodozisJ. (2003). Autopoietic and (M,R) systems. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 222, 261–272.
20.
LetelierJ. C.Soto-AndradeJ.Guíñez-AbarzúaF.Cornish-BowdenA.CárdenasM. L. (2006). Organizational invariance and metabolic closure: Analysis in terms of (M,R)-systems. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 238, 949–961.
21.
MaturanaH. (1970). Biology of cognition (Biological Computer Laboratory, BCL Report No. 9). Champaign: University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign.
22.
MaturanaH. (1975). The organization of the living: A theory of the living organization. International Journal of Man–Machine Studies, 7, 313–332.
23.
MaturanaH. (1990). Science and daily life: The ontology of scientific explanations. In KrohnW. (Eds.), Self-organization: Portrait of a scientific revolution (pp. 12–35). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
24.
MaturanaH. (1995). Biology of self-consciousness. In TratteurG. (Ed.), Consciousness: Distinction and reflection (pp. 145–175). Naples, Italy: Bibliopolis.
25.
MaturanaH. (2000). The nature of the laws of nature. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 17, 459–468.
26.
MaturanaH. (2003). The biological foundations of self-consciousness and the physical domain of existence. In LuhmannN.MaturanaH.NamikiM.RedderV.VarelaF. (Eds.), Beobachter: Convergenz der Erkenntnistheorien? (pp. 47–117). München, Germany: Wilhelm Fink Verlag.
27.
MaturanaH.VarelaF. (1987). The tree of knowledge. Boston, MA: Shambhala New Science Library.
28.
MaturanaH. R.VarelaF. J. (1980). Autopoiesis and cognition: The realization of the living. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
29.
MiłkowskiM. (2011). Beyond formal structure: A mechanistic perspective on computation and implementation. Journal of Cognitive Science, 12, 359–379.
30.
MiłkowskiM. (2013). Explaining the computational mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
31.
MossioM.LongoG.StewartJ. (2009). An expression of closure to efficient causation in terms of λ-calculus. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 257, 489–498.
32.
PiccininiG. (2004a). Functionalism, computationalism and mental content. Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 34, 375–410.
33.
PiccininiG. (2004b). Functionalism, computationalism, and mental states. Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science, 35, 811–833.
34.
PiccininiG. (2007). Computing mechanisms. Philosophy of Science, 74, 501–526.
35.
PiccininiG. (2008). Computation without representation. Philosophical Studies, 137, 205–241.
36.
PiccininiG. (2010). The mind as neural software? Understanding functionalism, computationalism, and computational functionalism. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 81, 269–311.
37.
PiccininiG. (2012). Computationalism. In MargolisE.StichS. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of philosophy of cognitive science (pp. 222–249). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
38.
PiccininiG. (2015). Physical computation. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
39.
PiccininiG.ScarantinoA. (2010). Computation vs. information processing: Why their difference matters to cognitive science. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 41, 237–246.
40.
PutnamH. (1967a). The mental life of some machines. In CasteñedaH.-N. (Ed.), Intentionality, minds, and perception (pp. 177–200). Detroit, MI: Wayne State University Press.
41.
PutnamH. (1967b). Psychological predicates. In CapitanW. H.MerrillD. D. (Eds.), Art, Mind, and Religion (pp.37–48). Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
42.
PutnamH. (1975). Mind, language, and reality. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
43.
PutnamH. (1988). Representation and reality. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
44.
SearleJ. (1992). The Rediscovery of Mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
45.
SchweizerP. (2014). Algorithms Implemented in Space and Time. In KibbleR. (Ed.), Proceedings of the 50th Anniversary Convention of the AISB (pp.128–36). Society for the Study of Artificial Intelligence and Simulation of Behaviour.
46.
SchweizerP. (2016). In what sense does the brain compute? In MüllerV. C. (Ed.), Computing and philosophy: Selected papers from IACAP 2014 (pp. 63–79). New York, NY: Springer.
47.
SegalL. (2001). The dream of reality: Heinz von Foerster’s constructivism. New York, NY: Springer.
48.
SprevakM. (2010). Computation, individuation, and the received view of representation. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 41, 260–270.
49.
StewartJ. R.GapenneO.Di PaoloE. A. (Eds.). (2010). Enaction: Toward a new paradigm for cognitive science. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
50.
StichS. (1983). From folk psychology to cognitive science. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
51.
ThompsonE. (2007). Mind in life: Biology, phenomenology, and the sciences of mind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
52.
VarelaF. (1996). The early days of autopoiesis: Heinz and Chile. Systems Research, 13, 407–416.
53.
VarelaF.ThompsonE.RoschE. (1991). The embodied mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
VillalobosM. (2015). The biological roots of cognition and the social origins of mind (Doctoral thesis). University of Edinburgh, UK.
56.
VillalobosM.DewhurstJ. (2017). Enactive autonomy in computational systems. Synthese. doi:10.1007/s11229-017-1386-z
57.
von FoersterH. (2003). Understanding understanding: Essays on cybernetics and cognition. New York, NY: Springer.
58.
WallaceB.RossA.DaviesJ.AndersonT. (Eds.). (2007). The mind, the body, and the world: Psychology after cognitivism?Exeter, UK: Imprint Academic.
59.
WheelerM. (2010). Minds, things and materiality. In MalafourisL.RenfrewC. (Eds.), The cognitive life of things: Recasting the boundaries of the mind (McDonald Institute monographs, pp. 29–37). Cambridge, UK: McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research Publications.
